Engineering Students' Perceptions and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Johannes L. Jooste, Karin E. Wolff, Jan G. Joubert
{"title":"Engineering Students' Perceptions and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence","authors":"Johannes L. Jooste,&nbsp;Karin E. Wolff,&nbsp;Jan G. Joubert","doi":"10.1002/cae.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores the evolving landscape of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in engineering education. With technologies like ChatGPT transforming academic practices, universities are experiencing related challenges with integration, ethics and academic integrity. This study was conducted at a South African university to gain insights into how engineering students use GAI applications and their perceptions of these applications in their academic study. Using a survey based on previous studies, data were collected from undergraduate and postgraduate engineering students. The results reveal widespread adoption of GAI applications, with preferences regarding appropriate use and regulation approaches. Students generally support GAI as a learning aid while also expressing concerns about its use in formal assessments. They prefer discipline-specific guidance over institutional policies, with only 1% supporting a complete ban on GAI use. The findings indicate significant interest in structured education about ethical GAI use, with many students planning to continue using these technologies in their future careers. This study provides insights for engineering educators working to balance innovation with academic integrity, highlighting the need for collaborative approaches between students and educators in engineering education to maximise GAI benefits while mitigating limitations. Future research should explore effective integration strategies and discipline-specific best practices as GAI capabilities continue to evolve.</p>","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":"33 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cae.70064","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.70064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the evolving landscape of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in engineering education. With technologies like ChatGPT transforming academic practices, universities are experiencing related challenges with integration, ethics and academic integrity. This study was conducted at a South African university to gain insights into how engineering students use GAI applications and their perceptions of these applications in their academic study. Using a survey based on previous studies, data were collected from undergraduate and postgraduate engineering students. The results reveal widespread adoption of GAI applications, with preferences regarding appropriate use and regulation approaches. Students generally support GAI as a learning aid while also expressing concerns about its use in formal assessments. They prefer discipline-specific guidance over institutional policies, with only 1% supporting a complete ban on GAI use. The findings indicate significant interest in structured education about ethical GAI use, with many students planning to continue using these technologies in their future careers. This study provides insights for engineering educators working to balance innovation with academic integrity, highlighting the need for collaborative approaches between students and educators in engineering education to maximise GAI benefits while mitigating limitations. Future research should explore effective integration strategies and discipline-specific best practices as GAI capabilities continue to evolve.

Abstract Image

工科学生对生成式人工智能的认知与使用
本研究探讨了工程教育中生成式人工智能(GAI)的发展前景。随着ChatGPT等技术改变学术实践,大学正面临着整合、道德和学术诚信方面的相关挑战。这项研究是在一所南非大学进行的,目的是深入了解工程专业学生如何使用GAI应用程序以及他们在学术研究中对这些应用程序的看法。在以往研究的基础上进行了一项调查,收集了工科本科生和研究生的数据。结果揭示了GAI应用程序的广泛采用,以及对适当使用和监管方法的偏好。学生们普遍支持GAI作为一种学习辅助工具,同时也表达了对其在正式评估中的使用的担忧。与机构政策相比,他们更喜欢具体学科的指导,只有1%的人支持完全禁止GAI的使用。研究结果表明,人们对道德GAI使用的结构化教育非常感兴趣,许多学生计划在未来的职业生涯中继续使用这些技术。这项研究为工程教育工作者平衡创新与学术诚信提供了见解,强调了工程教育中学生和教育工作者之间协作方法的必要性,以最大限度地提高GAI效益,同时减少限制。随着GAI能力的不断发展,未来的研究应该探索有效的集成策略和特定学科的最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Computer Applications in Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信