Carbon Emission Allowance and Oil Implied Volatility

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Haoyu Wang, Junpeng Di, Qing Han, Kefu Lyu
{"title":"Carbon Emission Allowance and Oil Implied Volatility","authors":"Haoyu Wang,&nbsp;Junpeng Di,&nbsp;Qing Han,&nbsp;Kefu Lyu","doi":"10.1002/fut.22599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study develops a theoretical model to link carbon emission allowance (CEA) prices to oil implied volatility. The model identifies two channels: an explicit channel where rising CEA prices increase production costs, inventory, and option hedging demand while reducing speculating demand, leading to a negative price effect; and an implicit channel where higher CEA prices signal future oil price increases, boosting option hedging demand and futures speculating demand resulting in a positive price effect. These dynamics create a U-shaped relationship between CEA prices and implied volatility. Empirical analysis in Chinese markets confirms this U-shaped relationship and the Granger causality of CEA prices. The findings from the seven trial markets suggest that the U-shape is primarily driven by the hedging demand of company headquarters in Beijing and Shanghai. Additionally, we find that CEA prices influence expected volatility and option demand, with a U-shaped effect on expected volatility and no impact on unexpected volatility. Higher CEA prices also increase futures speculation demand while leaving futures hedging demand unchanged. Furthermore, this study reveals that CEA prices Granger-cause West Texas Intermediate futures volatility and the aggregate effect of CEA prices on oil implied volatility reflects the combined impact of hedging and speculating demands in the option and futures markets and international oil volatility.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Futures Markets","volume":"45 8","pages":"946-976"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Futures Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fut.22599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study develops a theoretical model to link carbon emission allowance (CEA) prices to oil implied volatility. The model identifies two channels: an explicit channel where rising CEA prices increase production costs, inventory, and option hedging demand while reducing speculating demand, leading to a negative price effect; and an implicit channel where higher CEA prices signal future oil price increases, boosting option hedging demand and futures speculating demand resulting in a positive price effect. These dynamics create a U-shaped relationship between CEA prices and implied volatility. Empirical analysis in Chinese markets confirms this U-shaped relationship and the Granger causality of CEA prices. The findings from the seven trial markets suggest that the U-shape is primarily driven by the hedging demand of company headquarters in Beijing and Shanghai. Additionally, we find that CEA prices influence expected volatility and option demand, with a U-shaped effect on expected volatility and no impact on unexpected volatility. Higher CEA prices also increase futures speculation demand while leaving futures hedging demand unchanged. Furthermore, this study reveals that CEA prices Granger-cause West Texas Intermediate futures volatility and the aggregate effect of CEA prices on oil implied volatility reflects the combined impact of hedging and speculating demands in the option and futures markets and international oil volatility.

碳排放限额与石油隐含波动率
本文建立了碳排放限额(CEA)价格与石油隐含波动率之间的理论模型。模型确定了两个渠道:显性渠道,CEA价格上涨增加了生产成本、库存和期权套期保值需求,同时减少了投机需求,导致负价格效应;隐含通道,即CEA价格上涨预示未来油价上涨,从而提振期权对冲需求和期货投机需求,从而产生积极的价格效应。这些动态在CEA价格和隐含波动率之间形成了u型关系。对中国市场的实证分析证实了这一u型关系和CEA价格的格兰杰因果关系。7个试点市场的研究结果表明,u型走势主要受到北京和上海公司总部对冲需求的驱动。此外,我们发现CEA价格影响预期波动率和期权需求,对预期波动率呈u型效应,对意外波动率无影响。CEA价格上涨也增加了期货投机需求,但期货对冲需求保持不变。此外,本研究发现,CEA价格格兰杰成因西德克萨斯中质原油期货波动率和CEA价格对石油隐含波动率的总效应反映了期权和期货市场的套期保值和投机需求与国际石油波动率的综合影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Futures Markets
Journal of Futures Markets BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.80%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Futures Markets chronicles the latest developments in financial futures and derivatives. It publishes timely, innovative articles written by leading finance academics and professionals. Coverage ranges from the highly practical to theoretical topics that include futures, derivatives, risk management and control, financial engineering, new financial instruments, hedging strategies, analysis of trading systems, legal, accounting, and regulatory issues, and portfolio optimization. This publication contains the very latest research from the top experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信