Comparison of blood-brain barrier permeability changes in gyrencephalic (ferret & non-human primate) and lissencephalic (rat) models following blast overpressure exposures

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Kakulavarapu V. Rama Rao, Victor L. McLean, Donna M. Wilder, Shataakshi Dahal, Malavika Kattuparambil, Joseph B. Long, Venkatasivasai Sujith Sajja
{"title":"Comparison of blood-brain barrier permeability changes in gyrencephalic (ferret & non-human primate) and lissencephalic (rat) models following blast overpressure exposures","authors":"Kakulavarapu V. Rama Rao,&nbsp;Victor L. McLean,&nbsp;Donna M. Wilder,&nbsp;Shataakshi Dahal,&nbsp;Malavika Kattuparambil,&nbsp;Joseph B. Long,&nbsp;Venkatasivasai Sujith Sajja","doi":"10.1016/j.expneurol.2025.115375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Blast wave (BW)-associated brain injury criteria to assess risk of Warfighters are currently inadequate due to lack a suitable animal model that does not represent human blast injury pathology. We hypothesize that animal models with brain structures more closely resemble the human brain (e.g. gyrencephalic models) could better translate to recreate and identify human blast pathology. As a one-of-a kind evaluation, this study compared the blood brain barrier (BBB) integrity, gliovascular changes and neuroinflammation in lissencephalic (rats) and gyrencephalic (ferrets) models exposed to blast waves at varying overpressures (10, 15 and 20 psig) with a validation study in non-human primates exposed to a single BW at 20 psig. BBB disruption was measured by Evans blue extravasation. The extent of gliosis in brain sections was measured by immunofluorescence analysis of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba-1), and neurodegeneration was determined by silver staining. Ferrets exposed to BW had a statistically significant increase in extravasation of Evans blue in different brain regions while a no such changes were observed in the rat model. Blast also induced a significant reactive astrogliosis and microglial activation in ferrets. NHPs exposed to a single BW at 20 psig showed a significant increase in EB extravasation in only thalamus. These results suggest that gyrencephalic brain structures may be more vulnerable to vascular disruption compared to lissencephalic models and these models may have better translatability to human blast injuries and potentially better suited to identify injury thresholds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12246,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Neurology","volume":"392 ","pages":"Article 115375"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488625002390","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blast wave (BW)-associated brain injury criteria to assess risk of Warfighters are currently inadequate due to lack a suitable animal model that does not represent human blast injury pathology. We hypothesize that animal models with brain structures more closely resemble the human brain (e.g. gyrencephalic models) could better translate to recreate and identify human blast pathology. As a one-of-a kind evaluation, this study compared the blood brain barrier (BBB) integrity, gliovascular changes and neuroinflammation in lissencephalic (rats) and gyrencephalic (ferrets) models exposed to blast waves at varying overpressures (10, 15 and 20 psig) with a validation study in non-human primates exposed to a single BW at 20 psig. BBB disruption was measured by Evans blue extravasation. The extent of gliosis in brain sections was measured by immunofluorescence analysis of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba-1), and neurodegeneration was determined by silver staining. Ferrets exposed to BW had a statistically significant increase in extravasation of Evans blue in different brain regions while a no such changes were observed in the rat model. Blast also induced a significant reactive astrogliosis and microglial activation in ferrets. NHPs exposed to a single BW at 20 psig showed a significant increase in EB extravasation in only thalamus. These results suggest that gyrencephalic brain structures may be more vulnerable to vascular disruption compared to lissencephalic models and these models may have better translatability to human blast injuries and potentially better suited to identify injury thresholds.
爆炸超压暴露后脑回畸形(雪貂和非人灵长类动物)和无脑畸形(大鼠)模型血脑屏障通透性变化的比较
由于缺乏一种不代表人类爆炸损伤病理学的合适动物模型,因此目前评估作战人员与爆炸冲击波(BW)相关的脑损伤风险的标准并不充分。我们假设,具有更接近人类大脑结构的动物模型(例如脑回模型)可以更好地翻译和重建人类爆炸病理。作为一项独一无二的评估,本研究比较了暴露于不同超压(10、15和20 psig)冲击波下的无脑(大鼠)和脑脑(雪貂)模型的血脑屏障(BBB)完整性、神经血管变化和神经炎症,并对暴露于20 psig单一BW的非人灵长类动物进行了验证研究。Evans蓝色外渗测定血脑屏障破坏。采用免疫荧光法检测胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)、离子钙结合受体分子1 (Iba-1),银染色法检测神经退行性变。暴露于BW的雪貂脑内不同区域的埃文斯蓝外渗有统计学意义的增加,而在大鼠模型中没有观察到这种变化。Blast还诱导了雪貂的反应性星形胶质细胞形成和小胶质细胞活化。在20 psig下暴露于单一BW的NHPs仅在丘脑中显示EB外渗显著增加。这些结果表明,与无脑模型相比,脑回脑结构可能更容易受到血管破坏,这些模型可能对人类爆炸损伤具有更好的可翻译性,并且可能更适合于识别损伤阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental Neurology
Experimental Neurology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
258
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Experimental Neurology, a Journal of Neuroscience Research, publishes original research in neuroscience with a particular emphasis on novel findings in neural development, regeneration, plasticity and transplantation. The journal has focused on research concerning basic mechanisms underlying neurological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信