Using participatory conceptual modeling to integrate ecosystem and socioeconomic information into the fisheries stock assessment process: A Gulf of America red snapper case study

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Carissa L. Gervasi , Matthew McPherson , Mandy Karnauskas
{"title":"Using participatory conceptual modeling to integrate ecosystem and socioeconomic information into the fisheries stock assessment process: A Gulf of America red snapper case study","authors":"Carissa L. Gervasi ,&nbsp;Matthew McPherson ,&nbsp;Mandy Karnauskas","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2025.107464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fisheries stock assessments are the backbone of fisheries management in the United States. While a stock assessment model provides scientific estimates of stock status and overfishing limits, the broader process involves decisions about which data are collected, how the model is structured, and the social and economic effects of implementing the quota advice. Despite growing recognition that ecosystem and socioeconomic factors strongly influence fish stocks and fisheries, these drivers remain underrepresented in the assessment process. In the current period of rapid global change, environmental disturbances and anthropogenic impacts are increasing in frequency and intensity, escalating the need for stock assessments to explore and account for the complex dynamics among fish stocks, fisheries, and social systems. In our research, we illustrate how participatory conceptual modeling can improve the entire stock assessment to management process by identifying data gaps, elucidating changes in fishing activity and human behavior over time, providing context to help explain model uncertainty and improve model parameterization, and describing feedback loops and unintended consequences of management actions. A case study from the Gulf of America red snapper (<em>Lutjanus campechanus</em>) fishery is used to illustrate the benefits of this methodology. Encouraging participatory conceptual modeling alongside future stock assessments would greatly increase our understanding of the socio-ecological feedbacks that are often critical to management success, and help determine how best to manage fisheries through an ever changing environmental and human landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50443,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Research","volume":"288 ","pages":"Article 107464"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783625002012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fisheries stock assessments are the backbone of fisheries management in the United States. While a stock assessment model provides scientific estimates of stock status and overfishing limits, the broader process involves decisions about which data are collected, how the model is structured, and the social and economic effects of implementing the quota advice. Despite growing recognition that ecosystem and socioeconomic factors strongly influence fish stocks and fisheries, these drivers remain underrepresented in the assessment process. In the current period of rapid global change, environmental disturbances and anthropogenic impacts are increasing in frequency and intensity, escalating the need for stock assessments to explore and account for the complex dynamics among fish stocks, fisheries, and social systems. In our research, we illustrate how participatory conceptual modeling can improve the entire stock assessment to management process by identifying data gaps, elucidating changes in fishing activity and human behavior over time, providing context to help explain model uncertainty and improve model parameterization, and describing feedback loops and unintended consequences of management actions. A case study from the Gulf of America red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) fishery is used to illustrate the benefits of this methodology. Encouraging participatory conceptual modeling alongside future stock assessments would greatly increase our understanding of the socio-ecological feedbacks that are often critical to management success, and help determine how best to manage fisheries through an ever changing environmental and human landscape.
利用参与式概念模型将生态系统和社会经济信息整合到渔业资源评估过程中:美国湾红鲷鱼案例研究
渔业资源评估是美国渔业管理的支柱。虽然种群评估模型提供了种群状况和过度捕捞限制的科学估计,但更广泛的过程涉及决定收集哪些数据、如何构建模型以及执行配额建议的社会和经济影响。尽管人们日益认识到生态系统和社会经济因素对鱼类种群和渔业的强烈影响,但这些驱动因素在评估过程中的代表性仍然不足。在当前全球快速变化的时期,环境干扰和人为影响的频率和强度都在增加,这就增加了对鱼类种群、渔业和社会系统之间复杂动态进行探索和解释的必要性。在我们的研究中,我们通过识别数据缺口,阐明捕捞活动和人类行为随时间的变化,提供有助于解释模型不确定性和改进模型参数化的背景,以及描述反馈循环和管理行为的意外后果,说明参与式概念模型如何改善整个种群评估到管理过程。以美国湾红鲷鱼(Lutjanus campechanus)渔业为例,说明了这种方法的好处。鼓励参与性概念建模和未来的种群评估将大大增加我们对社会生态反馈的理解,这些反馈往往对管理的成功至关重要,并有助于确定如何通过不断变化的环境和人类景观来最好地管理渔业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fisheries Research
Fisheries Research 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides an international forum for the publication of papers in the areas of fisheries science, fishing technology, fisheries management and relevant socio-economics. The scope covers fisheries in salt, brackish and freshwater systems, and all aspects of associated ecology, environmental aspects of fisheries, and economics. Both theoretical and practical papers are acceptable, including laboratory and field experimental studies relevant to fisheries. Papers on the conservation of exploitable living resources are welcome. Review and Viewpoint articles are also published. As the specified areas inevitably impinge on and interrelate with each other, the approach of the journal is multidisciplinary, and authors are encouraged to emphasise the relevance of their own work to that of other disciplines. The journal is intended for fisheries scientists, biological oceanographers, gear technologists, economists, managers, administrators, policy makers and legislators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信