Uncertainty and normalized glandular dose evaluations in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis with a machine learning methodology

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Antonio Sarno , Rodrigo T. Massera , Gianfranco Paternò , Paolo Cardarelli , Nicholas Marshall , Hilde Bosmans , Kristina Bliznakova
{"title":"Uncertainty and normalized glandular dose evaluations in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis with a machine learning methodology","authors":"Antonio Sarno ,&nbsp;Rodrigo T. Massera ,&nbsp;Gianfranco Paternò ,&nbsp;Paolo Cardarelli ,&nbsp;Nicholas Marshall ,&nbsp;Hilde Bosmans ,&nbsp;Kristina Bliznakova","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To predict the normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients and the related uncertainty in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) using a machine learning algorithm and patient-like digital breast models.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>126 patient-like digital breast phantoms were used for DgN Monte Carlo ground truth calculations. An Automatic Relevance Determination Regression algorithm was used to predict DgN from anatomical breast features. These features included compressed breast thickness, glandular fraction by volume, glandular volume, center of mass and standard deviation of the glandular tissue distribution in the cranio-caudal direction. An algorithm for data imputation was explored to account for avoiding the use of the latter two features.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>5-fold cross validation showed that the predictive model provides an estimation of DgN with 1% average difference from the ground truth; this difference was less than 3% in 50% of the cases. The average uncertainty of the estimated DgN values was 9%. Excluding the information related to the glandular distribution increased this uncertainty to 17% without inducing a significant discrepancy in estimated DgN values, with half of the predicted cases differing from the ground truth by less than 9%. The data imputation algorithm reduced the estimated uncertainty, without restoring the original performance. Predictive performance improved by increasing tube voltage.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The proposed methodology predicts the DgN in mammography and DBT for patient-derived breasts with an uncertainty below 9%. Predicting test evaluations reported 1% average difference from the ground truth, with 50% of the cohort cases differing by less than 5%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 105043"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S112017972500153X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To predict the normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients and the related uncertainty in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) using a machine learning algorithm and patient-like digital breast models.

Methodology

126 patient-like digital breast phantoms were used for DgN Monte Carlo ground truth calculations. An Automatic Relevance Determination Regression algorithm was used to predict DgN from anatomical breast features. These features included compressed breast thickness, glandular fraction by volume, glandular volume, center of mass and standard deviation of the glandular tissue distribution in the cranio-caudal direction. An algorithm for data imputation was explored to account for avoiding the use of the latter two features.

Results

5-fold cross validation showed that the predictive model provides an estimation of DgN with 1% average difference from the ground truth; this difference was less than 3% in 50% of the cases. The average uncertainty of the estimated DgN values was 9%. Excluding the information related to the glandular distribution increased this uncertainty to 17% without inducing a significant discrepancy in estimated DgN values, with half of the predicted cases differing from the ground truth by less than 9%. The data imputation algorithm reduced the estimated uncertainty, without restoring the original performance. Predictive performance improved by increasing tube voltage.

Conclusion

The proposed methodology predicts the DgN in mammography and DBT for patient-derived breasts with an uncertainty below 9%. Predicting test evaluations reported 1% average difference from the ground truth, with 50% of the cohort cases differing by less than 5%.
用机器学习方法进行数字乳房x线照相术和数字乳房断层合成中的不确定性和标准化腺体剂量评估
目的利用机器学习算法和患者样数字乳房模型预测乳腺x线摄影和数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)的归一化腺剂量(DgN)系数及其不确定性。方法采用126例患者样数字乳房幻影进行DgN蒙特卡罗地真值计算。采用自动相关性确定回归算法从解剖乳房特征预测DgN。这些特征包括乳腺压缩厚度、腺体体积分数、腺体体积、质心和腺体组织在颅尾方向分布的标准差。研究了一种数据输入算法,以避免使用后两个特征。结果5倍交叉验证表明,该预测模型提供了与真实值平均相差1%的DgN估计;在50%的病例中,这一差异小于3%。估计DgN值的平均不确定度为9%。排除与腺体分布相关的信息将这种不确定性增加到17%,而不会引起估计DgN值的显着差异,其中一半的预测病例与基本事实的差异小于9%。该算法在不恢复原始性能的前提下,降低了估计的不确定性。提高管电压可提高预测性能。结论提出的方法预测乳腺x线摄影和DBT对患者源性乳房的DgN不确定性低于9%。预测测试评估报告的结果与实际情况的平均差异为1%,其中50%的队列病例差异小于5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信