Recombinant human pro-urokinase vs. alteplase within 4.5 hours of acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Tallal Mushtaq Hashmi MBBS , Aimen Shafiq MBBS , Rohma Zia MBBS , Hadiah Ashraf MBBS , Muhammad Burhan MBBS , Mushood Ahmed MBBS , Ahmad Mesmar MBBS , Raheel Ahmed MRCP , Gregg C. Fonarow MD, FACC
{"title":"Recombinant human pro-urokinase vs. alteplase within 4.5 hours of acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Tallal Mushtaq Hashmi MBBS , Aimen Shafiq MBBS , Rohma Zia MBBS , Hadiah Ashraf MBBS , Muhammad Burhan MBBS , Mushood Ahmed MBBS , Ahmad Mesmar MBBS , Raheel Ahmed MRCP , Gregg C. Fonarow MD, FACC","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recombinant human pro-urokinase (rhPro-UK) has emerged as a potential alternative to alteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. This meta-analysis evaluates and compares the efficacy and safety of rhPro-UK with alteplase in this patient population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane and Embase from inception to November 30, 2025, to identify eligible RCTs comparing intravenous rhPro-UK with alteplase in AIS patients treated within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan Web.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three RCTs encompassing 2,289 patients (rhPro-UK: 1141; alteplase: 1148) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis demonstrated no significant difference between rhPro-UK and alteplase in achieving excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1 at 90d: RR = 1.04, 95 % CI = 0.98 to 1.10; <em>P</em> = 0.17) and good functional outcome (mRS 0-2 at 90d: RR = 1.0, 95 % CI = 0.96 to 1.05; <em>P</em> = 0.86). No statistically significant difference was observed for early neurological improvement (RR 1.05, 95 % CI 0.96 to 1.15), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 0.52, 95 % CI = 0.19 to 1.43), all-cause mortality (RR 1.10, 95 % CI 0.64 to 1.91) and severe adverse events (RR = 0.92, 95 % CI = 0.75 to 1.13).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This meta-analysis found no statistically significant differences between rhPro-UK and alteplase in terms of functional outcomes, early neurological improvement, or safety profiles in patients with acute ischemic stroke. rhPro-UK shows promise as a cost-effective alternative, but further large-scale RCTs are required to confirm its role in AIS management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"34 8","pages":"Article 108392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305725001703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Recombinant human pro-urokinase (rhPro-UK) has emerged as a potential alternative to alteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. This meta-analysis evaluates and compares the efficacy and safety of rhPro-UK with alteplase in this patient population.
Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane and Embase from inception to November 30, 2025, to identify eligible RCTs comparing intravenous rhPro-UK with alteplase in AIS patients treated within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan Web.
Results
Three RCTs encompassing 2,289 patients (rhPro-UK: 1141; alteplase: 1148) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis demonstrated no significant difference between rhPro-UK and alteplase in achieving excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1 at 90d: RR = 1.04, 95 % CI = 0.98 to 1.10; P = 0.17) and good functional outcome (mRS 0-2 at 90d: RR = 1.0, 95 % CI = 0.96 to 1.05; P = 0.86). No statistically significant difference was observed for early neurological improvement (RR 1.05, 95 % CI 0.96 to 1.15), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 0.52, 95 % CI = 0.19 to 1.43), all-cause mortality (RR 1.10, 95 % CI 0.64 to 1.91) and severe adverse events (RR = 0.92, 95 % CI = 0.75 to 1.13).
Conclusion
This meta-analysis found no statistically significant differences between rhPro-UK and alteplase in terms of functional outcomes, early neurological improvement, or safety profiles in patients with acute ischemic stroke. rhPro-UK shows promise as a cost-effective alternative, but further large-scale RCTs are required to confirm its role in AIS management.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.