What's the optimal duration of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world study.

Zhoujunyi Tian, Haoshuai Yang, Jin Zhang, Derou Liu, Chaoyang Liang, Zhenrong Zhang
{"title":"What's the optimal duration of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world study.","authors":"Zhoujunyi Tian, Haoshuai Yang, Jin Zhang, Derou Liu, Chaoyang Liang, Zhenrong Zhang","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The optimal duration of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer remains unknown. This study aimed to assess whether the number of cycles of neoadjuvant therapy affects oncologic efficacy and surgical safety in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and subsequent surgery were included. Patients were divided into two groups: ≤ 2 or > 2 cycles. Oncology outcomes such as pathological complete response (pCR), and surgical outcomes were compared. Binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent factors for pCR. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare long-term survival between groups. Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors for recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 patients with clinical stage IB-IIIB disease were included; 68 received ≤ 2 cycles, and 72 received > 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. No significant difference was observed in pCR rates, surgery difficulty, and postoperative complications between groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis indicated that adenocarcinoma (odds ratio [OR] 0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.50, P = 0.003) and clinical T3 stage (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.72, P = 0.015) were unfavourable factors for pCR. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) between groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that number of neoadjuvant cycles was not a predictor of recurrence (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.31-2.44, P = 0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with 3 or more cycles, two cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy might achieve similar perioperative outcomes and long-term survival in selected patients. Prospective studies and extended follow-up are needed to verify the conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520617,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The optimal duration of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer remains unknown. This study aimed to assess whether the number of cycles of neoadjuvant therapy affects oncologic efficacy and surgical safety in a real-world setting.

Methods: Patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and subsequent surgery were included. Patients were divided into two groups: ≤ 2 or > 2 cycles. Oncology outcomes such as pathological complete response (pCR), and surgical outcomes were compared. Binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent factors for pCR. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare long-term survival between groups. Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors for recurrence.

Results: A total of 140 patients with clinical stage IB-IIIB disease were included; 68 received ≤ 2 cycles, and 72 received > 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. No significant difference was observed in pCR rates, surgery difficulty, and postoperative complications between groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis indicated that adenocarcinoma (odds ratio [OR] 0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.50, P = 0.003) and clinical T3 stage (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.72, P = 0.015) were unfavourable factors for pCR. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) between groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that number of neoadjuvant cycles was not a predictor of recurrence (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.31-2.44, P = 0.8).

Conclusions: Compared with 3 or more cycles, two cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy might achieve similar perioperative outcomes and long-term survival in selected patients. Prospective studies and extended follow-up are needed to verify the conclusions.

可切除的非小细胞肺癌的新辅助化学免疫治疗的最佳持续时间:一项现实世界的研究。
目的:可切除的非小细胞肺癌新辅助化疗免疫治疗的最佳时间尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估在现实世界中,新辅助治疗的周期数是否会影响肿瘤疗效和手术安全性。方法:可切除的非小细胞肺癌患者接受新辅助化疗和后续手术治疗。患者分为≤2个周期和> 2个周期两组。比较肿瘤预后,如病理完全缓解(pCR)和手术预后。进行二元logistic回归分析以确定pCR的独立因素。采用Kaplan-Meier分析比较各组间的长期生存率。进行Cox回归分析以确定复发的独立预测因素。结果:共纳入140例临床分期IB-IIIB疾病患者;68例接受≤2个周期,72例接受≤2个周期的新辅助化疗免疫治疗。两组间pCR率、手术难度、术后并发症无显著差异。多因素logistic回归分析显示,腺癌(比值比[OR] 0.14, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.04 ~ 0.50, P = 0.003)和临床T3分期(比值比[OR] 0.18, 95% CI 0.05 ~ 0.72, P = 0.015)是pCR的不利因素。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,两组无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)无显著差异。多因素Cox回归分析显示,新辅助治疗周期数不是复发的预测因子(HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.31-2.44, P = 0.8)。结论:与3个或更多周期相比,2个周期的新辅助化疗免疫治疗可能在选定的患者中获得相似的围手术期结果和长期生存。需要前瞻性研究和长期随访来验证结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信