PECS blocks: where are we now?

IF 2.1
Rafael Blanco
{"title":"PECS blocks: where are we now?","authors":"Rafael Blanco","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>This review provides an update on the literature concerning PECS blocks and some other thoracic plane blocks.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Research over the last 2 years has primarily focused on the application of PECS blocks in breast cancer, thoracic, and cardiac anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>PECS blocks have consistently been demonstrated to be safe, easy to perform, and effective, with no reported complications. Their efficacy has been validated by multiple independent scientific groups, particularly in terms of reducing opioid requirements and improving procedural outcomes. On the basis of this body of evidence, clinicians should weigh the benefits of various regional techniques, considering both complication rates and their own level of expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":520600,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the review: This review provides an update on the literature concerning PECS blocks and some other thoracic plane blocks.

Recent findings: Research over the last 2 years has primarily focused on the application of PECS blocks in breast cancer, thoracic, and cardiac anesthesia.

Summary: PECS blocks have consistently been demonstrated to be safe, easy to perform, and effective, with no reported complications. Their efficacy has been validated by multiple independent scientific groups, particularly in terms of reducing opioid requirements and improving procedural outcomes. On the basis of this body of evidence, clinicians should weigh the benefits of various regional techniques, considering both complication rates and their own level of expertise.

PECS街区:我们现在在哪里?
综述目的:本文综述了PECS阻滞和其他胸椎平面阻滞的最新文献。最近发现:过去两年的研究主要集中在PECS阻滞在乳腺癌、胸部和心脏麻醉中的应用。摘要:PECS阻滞一直被证明是安全、容易实施和有效的,没有并发症的报道。它们的功效已得到多个独立科学团体的验证,特别是在减少阿片类药物需求和改善手术结果方面。在这些证据的基础上,临床医生应该权衡各种区域技术的好处,同时考虑并发症发生率和他们自己的专业水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信