Factors Influencing Mistriage Based on the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nayeon Yi, Dain Baik
{"title":"Factors Influencing Mistriage Based on the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Nayeon Yi,&nbsp;Dain Baik","doi":"10.1111/jnu.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Mistriage is important because of its potential for serious consequences, notwithstanding the beneficial effects of the emergency patient classification system employed to alleviate overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to assess mistriage using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) and identify factors influencing it.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We examined the factors influencing mistriage in the KTAS and rates of under- and over-triage. Participants were obtained by combining electronic health records with registry data from the National Emergency Department Information System. We assessed the eligibility of patients aged ≥ 15 years who visited the ED between July 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023. Using the KTAS classification criterion, two experienced experts determined the final acuity level. We employed multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate the factors that predict under- and over-triage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 53,947 ED encounters, 1110 participants were enrolled in this study. Mistriage occurred in 207 (18.6%) patients: 88 (7.9%) had under-triage, and 119 (10.7%) had over-triage. In adjusted analyses, under-triage was associated with lower mean arterial pressure (odds ratio [OR], 5.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45–20.32) and presenting complaints of immunity or fever (OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.38–8.45), while over-triage was associated with advanced age (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28–0.98), pain (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.18–3.25), lower KTAS experience (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.08–3.51), and several specific present complaints.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>By improving mistriage, the quality of emergency medical services may be enhanced through reduced costs, increased operational efficiency, and improved patient safety and satisfaction. Implementation of standardized criteria, validated triage tools, and enhanced provider training is crucial for achieving more accurate emergency triage. Additionally, establishing regulatory and financial incentives and developing realistic standards for mistriage management will optimize triage processes and ensure prompt, prioritized care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":"57 5","pages":"860-873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jnu.70033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnu.70033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Mistriage is important because of its potential for serious consequences, notwithstanding the beneficial effects of the emergency patient classification system employed to alleviate overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to assess mistriage using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) and identify factors influencing it.

Design

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Methods

We examined the factors influencing mistriage in the KTAS and rates of under- and over-triage. Participants were obtained by combining electronic health records with registry data from the National Emergency Department Information System. We assessed the eligibility of patients aged ≥ 15 years who visited the ED between July 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023. Using the KTAS classification criterion, two experienced experts determined the final acuity level. We employed multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate the factors that predict under- and over-triage.

Results

Of 53,947 ED encounters, 1110 participants were enrolled in this study. Mistriage occurred in 207 (18.6%) patients: 88 (7.9%) had under-triage, and 119 (10.7%) had over-triage. In adjusted analyses, under-triage was associated with lower mean arterial pressure (odds ratio [OR], 5.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45–20.32) and presenting complaints of immunity or fever (OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.38–8.45), while over-triage was associated with advanced age (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28–0.98), pain (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.18–3.25), lower KTAS experience (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.08–3.51), and several specific present complaints.

Conclusions

By improving mistriage, the quality of emergency medical services may be enhanced through reduced costs, increased operational efficiency, and improved patient safety and satisfaction. Implementation of standardized criteria, validated triage tools, and enhanced provider training is crucial for achieving more accurate emergency triage. Additionally, establishing regulatory and financial incentives and developing realistic standards for mistriage management will optimize triage processes and ensure prompt, prioritized care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于韩国分诊法和视力量表的误伤影响因素:回顾性横断面研究。
导读:尽管急诊病人分类系统对缓解急诊科(EDs)的过度拥挤起到了有益的作用,但由于其潜在的严重后果,误伤是很重要的。本研究的目的是评估误伤使用韩国分类和敏锐度量表(KTAS),并确定影响因素。设计:回顾性横断面研究。方法:对影响KTAS分诊失败的因素及分诊过少率进行分析。参与者是通过将电子健康记录与国家急诊科信息系统的登记数据相结合获得的。我们评估了2022年7月1日至2023年6月30日期间就诊于急诊科的年龄≥15岁的患者的资格。根据KTAS的分类标准,两位经验丰富的专家确定了最终的视力水平。我们采用多元逻辑回归分析来评估预测分诊不足和分诊过度的因素。结果:在53,947例ED就诊中,有1110名参与者纳入了本研究。误诊207例(18.6%),分诊不足88例(7.9%),分诊过度119例(10.7%)。在校正分析中,分诊不足与较低的平均动脉压相关(优势比[OR], 5.42;95%可信区间[CI], 1.45-20.32),并表现出免疫或发烧的主诉(or, 3.41;95% CI, 1.38-8.45),而过度分类与高龄相关(OR, 0.52;95% CI, 0.28-0.98),疼痛(OR, 1.96;95% CI, 1.18-3.25),较低的KTAS经验(OR, 1.95;95% CI, 1.08-3.51),以及一些具体的投诉。结论:通过降低成本,提高操作效率,提高患者的安全性和满意度,可以提高急诊医疗服务质量。实施标准化标准、经过验证的分类工具和加强提供者培训对于实现更准确的紧急分类至关重要。此外,建立监管和财政激励措施,并为创伤管理制定切实可行的标准,将优化分诊流程,确保及时、优先护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信