Rethinking Anesthesia Medication "Errors": The OR-SMART Patient Safety Learning Laboratory.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ken R Catchpole, David M Neyens, James H Abernathy, Joshua Biro
{"title":"Rethinking Anesthesia Medication \"Errors\": The OR-SMART Patient Safety Learning Laboratory.","authors":"Ken R Catchpole, David M Neyens, James H Abernathy, Joshua Biro","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We combine the results of multiple studies to describe a systems engineering approach to a well-recognized patient safety problem. The goal of the Operating Room Systems-based Medication Administration error Reduction Team (OR-SMART) patient safety learning laboratory was to study the anesthesia medication work system to identify the characteristics of technologies and interventions that might feasibly reduce anesthesia medication errors.</p><p><strong>Scope: </strong>The work was conducted at 2 large urban academic medical centers: Johns Hopkins (JHU) and the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC). We sampled across many different types of anesthesia work, understanding the challenges of work-as-done, and applying systems safety principles and evaluation frameworks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed-methods study. Sources of data varied, with formal and informal interviews, formal and informal observations, video-based observations, hospital and national databases, and information from local incidents. Clinically embedded human factors professionals at both hospital sites facilitated informal sources of data. We explored the variable definitions of error; individual and organizational variability in decision-making; how syringes are used, stored, and moved within an operating room (OR); and used the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework to model medication processes. We were able to identify more than 100 possible interventions, and then prioritized a few for development and testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified medication icon labels, a syringe holder hub, and workspace design guidelines as interventions for evaluation. Significant benefits of medication label icons were found in simulation and were highly utilized in practice. The syringe hub demonstrated high acceptability at one site but substantially less at another. A virtual reality-based evaluation of the OR design found that situational awareness, visual monitoring, and available workspace were subjectively improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001384","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We combine the results of multiple studies to describe a systems engineering approach to a well-recognized patient safety problem. The goal of the Operating Room Systems-based Medication Administration error Reduction Team (OR-SMART) patient safety learning laboratory was to study the anesthesia medication work system to identify the characteristics of technologies and interventions that might feasibly reduce anesthesia medication errors.

Scope: The work was conducted at 2 large urban academic medical centers: Johns Hopkins (JHU) and the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC). We sampled across many different types of anesthesia work, understanding the challenges of work-as-done, and applying systems safety principles and evaluation frameworks.

Methods: This was a mixed-methods study. Sources of data varied, with formal and informal interviews, formal and informal observations, video-based observations, hospital and national databases, and information from local incidents. Clinically embedded human factors professionals at both hospital sites facilitated informal sources of data. We explored the variable definitions of error; individual and organizational variability in decision-making; how syringes are used, stored, and moved within an operating room (OR); and used the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework to model medication processes. We were able to identify more than 100 possible interventions, and then prioritized a few for development and testing.

Results: We identified medication icon labels, a syringe holder hub, and workspace design guidelines as interventions for evaluation. Significant benefits of medication label icons were found in simulation and were highly utilized in practice. The syringe hub demonstrated high acceptability at one site but substantially less at another. A virtual reality-based evaluation of the OR design found that situational awareness, visual monitoring, and available workspace were subjectively improved.

重新思考麻醉药物“错误”:OR-SMART患者安全学习实验室。
目的:我们结合多项研究的结果来描述一个系统工程方法来解决一个公认的患者安全问题。基于手术室系统的药物管理差错减少小组(OR-SMART)患者安全学习实验室的目标是研究麻醉用药工作系统,以确定可能减少麻醉用药差错的技术和干预措施的特点。研究范围:本研究在两个大型城市学术医疗中心进行:约翰霍普金斯大学(JHU)和南卡罗来纳医科大学(MUSC)。我们对许多不同类型的麻醉工作进行了采样,了解了已完成工作的挑战,并应用了系统安全原则和评估框架。方法:采用混合方法进行研究。数据来源各不相同,包括正式和非正式访谈、正式和非正式观察、基于视频的观察、医院和国家数据库以及来自当地事件的信息。两家医院的临床人为因素专业人员促进了非正式数据来源。我们探讨了误差的变量定义;个人和组织决策的可变性;注射器如何在手术室内使用、储存和移动;并使用患者安全系统工程倡议(SEIPS)框架对用药过程进行建模。我们能够确定100多种可能的干预措施,然后优先考虑开发和测试其中的一些。结果:我们确定了药物图标标签、注射器支架中心和工作空间设计指南作为评估的干预措施。在模拟实验中发现了药物标签图标的显著优点,并在实践中得到了高度利用。注射器中心在一个地点显示出高可接受性,但在另一个地点则明显降低。基于虚拟现实的OR设计评估发现,态势感知、视觉监控和可用工作空间在主观上得到了改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信