Digital health technology adoption factors: a rapid review of systematic reviews and checklist development.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Tokiko Hamasaki, Catherine Briand, Amani Mahroug, Anick Sauvageau
{"title":"Digital health technology adoption factors: a rapid review of systematic reviews and checklist development.","authors":"Tokiko Hamasaki, Catherine Briand, Amani Mahroug, Anick Sauvageau","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2526175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This rapid review of systematic reviews aimed to synthesize the adoption factors of digital health technologies (DHTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A reference search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, PubMed, EBM Review, Web of Science, Scopus, PROSPERO and Google Scholar to search systematic reviews published in the last three years. Study selection was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews was assessed with the AMSTAR 2 tool. The identified adoption factors were classified using the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework, in which the self-determination factors were integrated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 4277 identified references, 45 systematic reviews were retained. The quality of most included systematic reviews, assessed by AMSTAR 2, was critically low. The most cited adoption factors included <i>DHT's ease of use, training for using DHT, adopters' access to DHT and a high-speed internet connection, technical support, DHT's customizability, the relevance and reliability of DHT data, the demand-side value of DHT (desirability), safety, cost-effectiveness, staff and patient competence, patient relatedness with others, organizational readiness, necessary changes in team routines, capacity for innovation</i>, along with <i>the political, economic, regulatory and sociocultural contexts</i>. Integrating the findings of this rapid review, a DHT adoption checklist was elaborated. This checklist would aid future developers and implementers of DHT in successfully adopting the technology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review synthesized the DHT adoption factors using the NASSS framework and Self-Determination Theory. When developing or implementing a DHT, the micro-, meso- and macro-level adoption factors must be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2526175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This rapid review of systematic reviews aimed to synthesize the adoption factors of digital health technologies (DHTs).

Methods: A reference search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, PubMed, EBM Review, Web of Science, Scopus, PROSPERO and Google Scholar to search systematic reviews published in the last three years. Study selection was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews was assessed with the AMSTAR 2 tool. The identified adoption factors were classified using the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework, in which the self-determination factors were integrated.

Results: Out of 4277 identified references, 45 systematic reviews were retained. The quality of most included systematic reviews, assessed by AMSTAR 2, was critically low. The most cited adoption factors included DHT's ease of use, training for using DHT, adopters' access to DHT and a high-speed internet connection, technical support, DHT's customizability, the relevance and reliability of DHT data, the demand-side value of DHT (desirability), safety, cost-effectiveness, staff and patient competence, patient relatedness with others, organizational readiness, necessary changes in team routines, capacity for innovation, along with the political, economic, regulatory and sociocultural contexts. Integrating the findings of this rapid review, a DHT adoption checklist was elaborated. This checklist would aid future developers and implementers of DHT in successfully adopting the technology.

Conclusions: This review synthesized the DHT adoption factors using the NASSS framework and Self-Determination Theory. When developing or implementing a DHT, the micro-, meso- and macro-level adoption factors must be considered.

数字卫生技术采用因素:系统审查和检查表开发的快速审查。
目的:本系统综述旨在综合数字卫生技术(dht)的采用因素。方法:检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsychInfo、PubMed、EBM Review、Web of Science、Scopus、PROSPERO、谷歌Scholar等数据库,检索近3年发表的系统综述。研究选择遵循PRISMA指南进行。采用AMSTAR 2工具评估纳入的系统评价的方法学质量。采用不采用、放弃、扩大、传播和可持续性(NASSS)框架对确定的采用因素进行分类,其中整合了自决因素。结果:在4277篇检索到的文献中,有45篇系统评价被保留。AMSTAR 2评估的大多数纳入的系统评价的质量非常低。被引用最多的采用因素包括DHT的易用性、使用DHT的培训、采用者对DHT的访问和高速互联网连接、技术支持、DHT的可定制性、DHT数据的相关性和可靠性、DHT的需求方价值(可取性)、安全性、成本效益、员工和患者的能力、患者与他人的关系、组织准备、团队常规的必要改变、创新能力,以及政治、经济、经济和社会因素。监管和社会文化背景。综合这一快速审查的结果,制定了DHT采用清单。这份清单将帮助DHT的未来开发人员和实现者成功采用该技术。结论:本文运用NASSS框架和自我决定理论综合了DHT采用因素。在制定或实施DHT时,必须考虑微观、中观和宏观层面的采用因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信