Constructing Research: A Theoretical Perspective on Research and Creativity in Architecture.

Abstract

Objective: This article provides a conceptual exploration of research and creativity within the profession of architecture, including a proposed theoretical framework exemplifying research as a catalyst in the creative process in practice. Background: There is a growing recognition among thought leaders in the profession of architecture that both intuition and research have a rightful place in the creative process. However, there remains a pervasive concern in practice that research can threaten or detract from creativity. There is an opportunity for conceptual integration of these approaches. Methodology: Inspired by Reflective Equilibrium, this work is an analysis of the potential synergies between research and creativity in architecture. The dichotomy between normative assumptions of the two concepts is reassessed. Results: A conceptual model called The Supportive Model of Research is proposed, showing how research is more likely suited as a catalyst within the creative process in the profession of architecture. This model explores three ways research can benefit the creative process: (a) fortification; (b) protection; and (c) elevation. Three narratives are presented to illustrate the three components of the model. Conclusions: The apparent dichotomy between intuition and research may be false; after all, there is rarely a one-size-fits-all approach to every problem. There is a need to construct a new paradigm with clarity around the benefits of an expansive view and an integrated approach, with research as a support for the virtues of creativity. The work in this paper is an attempt to "break ground" on this conceptual construction project.