What do physicians want at the end? An international qualitative study on physicians' personal end-of-life preferences and what influences them.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524251351349
Sarah Mroz, Frederick Daenen, Sigrid Dierickx, Freddy Mortier, Ludovica De Panfilis, Luca Ghirotto, Toby Campbell, Kenneth Chambaere, Luc Deliens
{"title":"What do physicians want at the end? An international qualitative study on physicians' personal end-of-life preferences and what influences them.","authors":"Sarah Mroz, Frederick Daenen, Sigrid Dierickx, Freddy Mortier, Ludovica De Panfilis, Luca Ghirotto, Toby Campbell, Kenneth Chambaere, Luc Deliens","doi":"10.1177/26323524251351349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians play a key role in end-of-life decision-making. As research suggests a connection between physicians' personal end-of-life preferences and their clinical practice, it is important to understand what physicians want for themselves at the end of life and what has shaped their preferences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore what physicians have considered for their end-of-life preferences, including life-sustaining and life-shortening practices, and their perceptions of the socio-cultural factors that influence their preferences.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study using in-depth interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five interviews were conducted from January to November 2022 using a semi-structured interview guide. Participants included three types of physicians: general practitioners, palliative care physicians, and other medical specialists in Belgium (Flanders), Italy, and the United States (Wisconsin). Data collection and analysis were informed using the reflexive thematic analysis approach. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and NVivo 14 was used for coding and analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found physicians, particularly those in palliative care, have reflected on their end-of-life preferences and have ideas about what constitutes a good death and what they hope to avoid. Most physicians prefer to avoid aggressive and life-prolonging treatment, physical and mental suffering, and being a burden. They prioritize being in a peaceful environment and communication with loved ones. Various factors influence preferences including cultural, social, and religious beliefs, and legislative environment, but most significant are the deaths of loved ones and clinical practice. Death and dying become normalized the more they are reflected upon and discussed, and this process can also provide personal growth which helps physicians provide better care to patients and families.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physicians have reflected on their end-of-life preferences and prefer a peaceful end of life without aggressive and life-prolonging treatment. Physicians' views on end-of-life practices are influenced by evolving cultural and societal norms and legal and ethical factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"19 ","pages":"26323524251351349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524251351349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physicians play a key role in end-of-life decision-making. As research suggests a connection between physicians' personal end-of-life preferences and their clinical practice, it is important to understand what physicians want for themselves at the end of life and what has shaped their preferences.

Objective: To explore what physicians have considered for their end-of-life preferences, including life-sustaining and life-shortening practices, and their perceptions of the socio-cultural factors that influence their preferences.

Design: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews.

Methods: Forty-five interviews were conducted from January to November 2022 using a semi-structured interview guide. Participants included three types of physicians: general practitioners, palliative care physicians, and other medical specialists in Belgium (Flanders), Italy, and the United States (Wisconsin). Data collection and analysis were informed using the reflexive thematic analysis approach. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and NVivo 14 was used for coding and analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) were followed.

Results: We found physicians, particularly those in palliative care, have reflected on their end-of-life preferences and have ideas about what constitutes a good death and what they hope to avoid. Most physicians prefer to avoid aggressive and life-prolonging treatment, physical and mental suffering, and being a burden. They prioritize being in a peaceful environment and communication with loved ones. Various factors influence preferences including cultural, social, and religious beliefs, and legislative environment, but most significant are the deaths of loved ones and clinical practice. Death and dying become normalized the more they are reflected upon and discussed, and this process can also provide personal growth which helps physicians provide better care to patients and families.

Conclusion: Physicians have reflected on their end-of-life preferences and prefer a peaceful end of life without aggressive and life-prolonging treatment. Physicians' views on end-of-life practices are influenced by evolving cultural and societal norms and legal and ethical factors.

医生最后想要的是什么?一项关于医生个人临终偏好及其影响因素的国际定性研究。
背景:医生在临终决策中起着关键作用。研究表明,医生的个人临终偏好与他们的临床实践之间存在联系,因此,了解医生在生命的最后阶段想要什么,以及是什么影响了他们的偏好,这一点很重要。目的:探讨医生对其临终偏好的考虑,包括维持生命和缩短生命的做法,以及他们对影响其偏好的社会文化因素的看法。设计:采用深度访谈的定性研究。方法:采用半结构化访谈指南,于2022年1月至11月进行了45次访谈。参与者包括三种类型的医生:比利时(佛兰德斯)、意大利和美国(威斯康辛)的全科医生、姑息治疗医生和其他医学专家。数据收集和分析采用反身性专题分析方法。录音逐字转录,使用NVivo 14进行编码和分析。遵循报告定性研究的综合标准(COREQ)。结果:我们发现,医生,特别是那些从事姑息治疗的医生,已经反思了他们的临终偏好,并对什么是良好的死亡以及他们希望避免的事情有了自己的想法。大多数医生倾向于避免积极的和延长生命的治疗,身体和精神上的痛苦,并成为一种负担。他们优先考虑在一个和平的环境中与所爱的人交流。影响偏好的因素多种多样,包括文化、社会、宗教信仰和立法环境,但最重要的是亲人的死亡和临床实践。对死亡和濒死的反思和讨论越多,它们就会变得常态化,这个过程也可以提供个人成长,帮助医生为病人和家属提供更好的护理。结论:医生已经反思了他们的临终偏好,他们更喜欢和平地结束生命,而不是积极的延长生命的治疗。医生对临终实践的看法受到不断发展的文化和社会规范以及法律和伦理因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信