Total Hip Arthroplasty Stems and Femur Strain During Implant Insertion: A Biomechanical Study of Single Taper, Double Taper, and Collared Monolithic Stems.

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Barrett Bruno Torre, Jordan Andre Bauer, Ian Wellington, Tannaz Sedghi, Dillon Neumann, Adam Lindsay, Olga Solovyova
{"title":"Total Hip Arthroplasty Stems and Femur Strain During Implant Insertion: A Biomechanical Study of Single Taper, Double Taper, and Collared Monolithic Stems.","authors":"Barrett Bruno Torre, Jordan Andre Bauer, Ian Wellington, Tannaz Sedghi, Dillon Neumann, Adam Lindsay, Olga Solovyova","doi":"10.1111/os.70110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In total hip arthroplasty (THA), intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (IOPFF) is a significant concern, often occurring during femoral canal instrumentation and stem implantation due to proximal femur strain. However, the impact of different stem designs on this strain remains unclear. This study conducted a biomechanical analysis comparing strain patterns on the proximal femur during the implantation of three stem types: single taper, double taper, and collared stems. This study aims to explore if there is a difference in strain patterns placed on the proximal femur during the implantation of three different stem types: single taper, double taper, and collared stems?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were 24 cadaveric femurs randomly assigned to three groups based on implant geometry: Smith and Nephew anthology (single taper), synergy (double taper), and polar (collared) stems. Strain gauges were placed on the proximal femur to measure strain during implantation in both horizontal and vertical directions. Peak strain, the difference between maximum strain at final impaction and baseline, was recorded. The Kruskal-Wallis test compared peak strain between stem designs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the medial proximal femur, collared stems produced compressive strain (-276) in the horizontal vector, differing significantly from the tensile strain generated by single (41, p = 0.009) and double taper stems (218.5, p = 0.003). No significant strain difference existed between single and double taper stems at the medial proximal femur. At the lateral proximal femur, double taper stem impaction resulted in compressive strain (-69), significantly differing from the tensile strain produced by single taper (221, p = 0.024) and collared stem impaction (462, p = 0.009). No strain differences were observed in other tested areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights distinct strain patterns at the medial and lateral proximal femur depending on the stem type. Collared stems induce compressive strain at the medial proximal femur, while double taper stems result in compressive strain at the lateral proximal femur. Understanding these differences may help reduce IOPFF risk in THA procedures. Based on these findings, the use of collard stems would be preferable over single or double taper stems in elderly patients with suboptimal bone quality, as it reduces strain on the medial cortex and improves immediate stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In total hip arthroplasty (THA), intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (IOPFF) is a significant concern, often occurring during femoral canal instrumentation and stem implantation due to proximal femur strain. However, the impact of different stem designs on this strain remains unclear. This study conducted a biomechanical analysis comparing strain patterns on the proximal femur during the implantation of three stem types: single taper, double taper, and collared stems. This study aims to explore if there is a difference in strain patterns placed on the proximal femur during the implantation of three different stem types: single taper, double taper, and collared stems?

Methods: There were 24 cadaveric femurs randomly assigned to three groups based on implant geometry: Smith and Nephew anthology (single taper), synergy (double taper), and polar (collared) stems. Strain gauges were placed on the proximal femur to measure strain during implantation in both horizontal and vertical directions. Peak strain, the difference between maximum strain at final impaction and baseline, was recorded. The Kruskal-Wallis test compared peak strain between stem designs.

Results: At the medial proximal femur, collared stems produced compressive strain (-276) in the horizontal vector, differing significantly from the tensile strain generated by single (41, p = 0.009) and double taper stems (218.5, p = 0.003). No significant strain difference existed between single and double taper stems at the medial proximal femur. At the lateral proximal femur, double taper stem impaction resulted in compressive strain (-69), significantly differing from the tensile strain produced by single taper (221, p = 0.024) and collared stem impaction (462, p = 0.009). No strain differences were observed in other tested areas.

Conclusion: This study highlights distinct strain patterns at the medial and lateral proximal femur depending on the stem type. Collared stems induce compressive strain at the medial proximal femur, while double taper stems result in compressive strain at the lateral proximal femur. Understanding these differences may help reduce IOPFF risk in THA procedures. Based on these findings, the use of collard stems would be preferable over single or double taper stems in elderly patients with suboptimal bone quality, as it reduces strain on the medial cortex and improves immediate stability.

全髋关节置换术柄和股骨在植入过程中的应变:单锥度、双锥度和有圈整体柄的生物力学研究。
目的:在全髋关节置换术(THA)中,术中股骨假体周围骨折(IOPFF)是一个值得关注的问题,经常发生在股骨管内固定和柄植入期间,由于股骨近端应变。然而,不同茎设计对该菌株的影响尚不清楚。本研究进行了生物力学分析,比较了三种类型的柄:单锥度、双锥度和有领柄植入时股骨近端应变模式。本研究旨在探讨在植入三种不同类型的椎体柄(单锥度、双锥度和有领型椎体柄)时,放置在股骨近端上的应变模式是否存在差异?方法:24具尸体股骨根据种植体几何形状随机分为三组:Smith and Nephew选集(单锥度)、协同(双锥度)和极性(有领)茎。在股骨近端放置应变计,测量植入过程中水平和垂直方向的应变。记录峰值应变,即最终碰撞时最大应变与基线之间的差值。Kruskal-Wallis试验比较了不同设计的茎的峰值应变。结果:在股骨内侧近端,有领柄在水平方向上产生压缩应变(-276),与单锥柄(41,p = 0.009)和双锥柄(218.5,p = 0.003)产生的拉伸应变显著不同。股骨内侧近端单根和双根锥度柄的应变无显著差异。在股骨外侧近端,双锥度柄嵌塞导致压缩应变(-69),与单锥度柄嵌塞(221,p = 0.024)和有圈柄嵌塞(462,p = 0.009)产生的拉伸应变显著不同。其他测试区域未见应变差异。结论:这项研究强调了不同的应变模式在股骨内侧和外侧近端取决于茎型。有圈柄在股骨内侧近端引起压应变,而双锥柄在股骨外侧近端引起压应变。了解这些差异可能有助于降低THA手术中IOPFF的风险。基于这些发现,对于骨质量不佳的老年患者,使用花叶茎比单或双锥形茎更可取,因为它减少了对内侧皮质的压力,提高了立即的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信