Feifei Wu, Viola Bartoletti, Diletta Trojan, Giulia Montagner, Jacopo Del Verme, Roberto Zanata, Giuseppe Canova, Enrico Giordan
{"title":"Fusion outcomes of structural bone allograft in cervical and lumbar spine surgery: analysis of 147 patients over a decade of follow-up.","authors":"Feifei Wu, Viola Bartoletti, Diletta Trojan, Giulia Montagner, Jacopo Del Verme, Roberto Zanata, Giuseppe Canova, Enrico Giordan","doi":"10.21037/jss-24-130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been a global increase in spinal fusion surgeries, driving the need for improved graft materials. Human structural allografts from tissue banks provide a safe, cost-effective and efficient alternative, circumventing donor site issues and reducing operating time. This study retrospectively analyses the long-term follow-up of human structural grafts used in various spinal fusion surgeries. The analysis aims to highlight that structural bone grafts are a viable option for spinal fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 147 patients over 18 years old who were treated for cervical and lumbar spinal degenerative, traumatic or oncologic conditions at a single hospital from January 2006 to December 2016. Clinical and radiological follow-up was conducted until December 2023. Human structural bone grafts, sourced from cadaver donors and provided by a single tissue bank, were used in all cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 98 patients underwent cervical surgery. Among these, 77.6% received bone grafting due to cervical spine fracture luxation, 21.4% for severe degenerative conditions, and 1.0% for corpectomy consequent to tumour metastasis. The mean follow-up was 155.0±35.7 months, with no subsidence documented. A total of 49 patients underwent lumbar surgery, with 95.9% receiving human bone grafting for lumbar spine fracture luxation and the remaining patients for multiple myeloma and degenerative conditions. The mean overall follow-up was 144.7±38.9 months, with only 1 case of subsidence registered in this group. In 98.9% of cervical and 97.9% of lumbar patients, satisfactory fusion was achieved and maintained over the years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Homologous structural bone grafting remains an excellent option for spinal fusion in traumatic and degenerative conditions or as a valuable option in spinal revision surgeries and in cases where the use of cages is not feasible due to anatomical constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"11 2","pages":"256-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There has been a global increase in spinal fusion surgeries, driving the need for improved graft materials. Human structural allografts from tissue banks provide a safe, cost-effective and efficient alternative, circumventing donor site issues and reducing operating time. This study retrospectively analyses the long-term follow-up of human structural grafts used in various spinal fusion surgeries. The analysis aims to highlight that structural bone grafts are a viable option for spinal fusion.
Methods: The study included 147 patients over 18 years old who were treated for cervical and lumbar spinal degenerative, traumatic or oncologic conditions at a single hospital from January 2006 to December 2016. Clinical and radiological follow-up was conducted until December 2023. Human structural bone grafts, sourced from cadaver donors and provided by a single tissue bank, were used in all cases.
Results: A total of 98 patients underwent cervical surgery. Among these, 77.6% received bone grafting due to cervical spine fracture luxation, 21.4% for severe degenerative conditions, and 1.0% for corpectomy consequent to tumour metastasis. The mean follow-up was 155.0±35.7 months, with no subsidence documented. A total of 49 patients underwent lumbar surgery, with 95.9% receiving human bone grafting for lumbar spine fracture luxation and the remaining patients for multiple myeloma and degenerative conditions. The mean overall follow-up was 144.7±38.9 months, with only 1 case of subsidence registered in this group. In 98.9% of cervical and 97.9% of lumbar patients, satisfactory fusion was achieved and maintained over the years.
Conclusions: Homologous structural bone grafting remains an excellent option for spinal fusion in traumatic and degenerative conditions or as a valuable option in spinal revision surgeries and in cases where the use of cages is not feasible due to anatomical constraints.