Fusion outcomes of structural bone allograft in cervical and lumbar spine surgery: analysis of 147 patients over a decade of follow-up.

Q1 Medicine
Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-27 Epub Date: 2025-04-28 DOI:10.21037/jss-24-130
Feifei Wu, Viola Bartoletti, Diletta Trojan, Giulia Montagner, Jacopo Del Verme, Roberto Zanata, Giuseppe Canova, Enrico Giordan
{"title":"Fusion outcomes of structural bone allograft in cervical and lumbar spine surgery: analysis of 147 patients over a decade of follow-up.","authors":"Feifei Wu, Viola Bartoletti, Diletta Trojan, Giulia Montagner, Jacopo Del Verme, Roberto Zanata, Giuseppe Canova, Enrico Giordan","doi":"10.21037/jss-24-130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been a global increase in spinal fusion surgeries, driving the need for improved graft materials. Human structural allografts from tissue banks provide a safe, cost-effective and efficient alternative, circumventing donor site issues and reducing operating time. This study retrospectively analyses the long-term follow-up of human structural grafts used in various spinal fusion surgeries. The analysis aims to highlight that structural bone grafts are a viable option for spinal fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 147 patients over 18 years old who were treated for cervical and lumbar spinal degenerative, traumatic or oncologic conditions at a single hospital from January 2006 to December 2016. Clinical and radiological follow-up was conducted until December 2023. Human structural bone grafts, sourced from cadaver donors and provided by a single tissue bank, were used in all cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 98 patients underwent cervical surgery. Among these, 77.6% received bone grafting due to cervical spine fracture luxation, 21.4% for severe degenerative conditions, and 1.0% for corpectomy consequent to tumour metastasis. The mean follow-up was 155.0±35.7 months, with no subsidence documented. A total of 49 patients underwent lumbar surgery, with 95.9% receiving human bone grafting for lumbar spine fracture luxation and the remaining patients for multiple myeloma and degenerative conditions. The mean overall follow-up was 144.7±38.9 months, with only 1 case of subsidence registered in this group. In 98.9% of cervical and 97.9% of lumbar patients, satisfactory fusion was achieved and maintained over the years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Homologous structural bone grafting remains an excellent option for spinal fusion in traumatic and degenerative conditions or as a valuable option in spinal revision surgeries and in cases where the use of cages is not feasible due to anatomical constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"11 2","pages":"256-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There has been a global increase in spinal fusion surgeries, driving the need for improved graft materials. Human structural allografts from tissue banks provide a safe, cost-effective and efficient alternative, circumventing donor site issues and reducing operating time. This study retrospectively analyses the long-term follow-up of human structural grafts used in various spinal fusion surgeries. The analysis aims to highlight that structural bone grafts are a viable option for spinal fusion.

Methods: The study included 147 patients over 18 years old who were treated for cervical and lumbar spinal degenerative, traumatic or oncologic conditions at a single hospital from January 2006 to December 2016. Clinical and radiological follow-up was conducted until December 2023. Human structural bone grafts, sourced from cadaver donors and provided by a single tissue bank, were used in all cases.

Results: A total of 98 patients underwent cervical surgery. Among these, 77.6% received bone grafting due to cervical spine fracture luxation, 21.4% for severe degenerative conditions, and 1.0% for corpectomy consequent to tumour metastasis. The mean follow-up was 155.0±35.7 months, with no subsidence documented. A total of 49 patients underwent lumbar surgery, with 95.9% receiving human bone grafting for lumbar spine fracture luxation and the remaining patients for multiple myeloma and degenerative conditions. The mean overall follow-up was 144.7±38.9 months, with only 1 case of subsidence registered in this group. In 98.9% of cervical and 97.9% of lumbar patients, satisfactory fusion was achieved and maintained over the years.

Conclusions: Homologous structural bone grafting remains an excellent option for spinal fusion in traumatic and degenerative conditions or as a valuable option in spinal revision surgeries and in cases where the use of cages is not feasible due to anatomical constraints.

颈椎和腰椎手术中同种异体骨结构移植的融合效果:147例患者10年随访分析
背景:脊柱融合手术在全球范围内的增加,推动了对改良移植物材料的需求。来自组织库的人类同种异体结构移植物提供了一种安全、经济、高效的替代方法,避免了供体部位问题,缩短了手术时间。本研究回顾性分析了用于各种脊柱融合手术的人类结构移植物的长期随访。分析的目的是强调结构骨移植物是脊柱融合的可行选择。方法:该研究纳入了2006年1月至2016年12月在同一家医院接受颈椎和腰椎退行性、创伤性或肿瘤性疾病治疗的18岁以上的147例患者。临床和放射学随访一直持续到2023年12月。所有病例均使用了来自尸体供体并由单一组织库提供的人类结构骨移植物。结果:98例患者行颈椎手术。其中,77.6%因颈椎骨折脱位而行植骨,21.4%因严重退行性疾病而行植骨,1.0%因肿瘤转移而行椎体切除术。平均随访155.0±35.7个月,无沉降记录。49例患者行腰椎手术,95.9%为腰椎骨折脱位植骨,其余为多发性骨髓瘤和退行性疾病。平均总随访时间为144.7±38.9个月,本组仅有1例沉陷。98.9%的颈椎和97.9%的腰椎患者获得了满意的融合并保持了多年。结论:同种结构骨移植仍然是创伤性和退行性脊柱融合术的一个很好的选择,或者在脊柱翻修手术和由于解剖限制而无法使用笼的情况下作为一个有价值的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信