Factors associated with primary resistance to enfortumab vedotin in previously treated patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Daiki Ikarashi, Nozomi Hayakawa, Go Kaneko, Yuma Sakura, Yuki Endo, Ryo Yamashita, Suguru Shirotake, Yukihiro Kondo, Eiji Kikuchi, Wataru Obara
{"title":"Factors associated with primary resistance to enfortumab vedotin in previously treated patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"Daiki Ikarashi, Nozomi Hayakawa, Go Kaneko, Yuma Sakura, Yuki Endo, Ryo Yamashita, Suguru Shirotake, Yukihiro Kondo, Eiji Kikuchi, Wataru Obara","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02822-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the primary resistance factors to enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy by comparing treatment outcomes between the early progressive disease (EPD) group and non-EPD group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 121 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received EV monotherapy across five institutions between 2019 and 2024. The patients were categorized into the EPD group (n = 34), defined by radiologically confirmed progressive disease within 3 months of EV initiation, and the non-EPD group (n = 87). The clinical parameters and oncological outcomes were compared between groups. The emergence of new metastatic lesions was defined as the detection of metastases in organs not previously identified as metastatic sites at baseline, during prior chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) before the initiation of EV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall survival was significantly shorter in the EPD group than in the non-EPD group (6.5 vs. 19.9 months, p < 0.001). The EPD group had a significantly higher incidence of new metastatic lesions and a lower prevalence of normal Hb levels. Multivariate analysis identified low Hb and the presence of new metastatic lesions as independent predictors of EPD. Among patients with new metastases in the EPD group, an average of 74% of lesions emerged during ICI treatment and 75% involved multiple foci. Notably, more than 50% of these new lesions showed progression at the same sites following EV therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with low hemoglobin levels and new metastatic lesions before EV treatment may be at increased risk for EPD. For these patients, alternative treatment strategies should be considered before initiating EV.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1841-1848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02822-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the primary resistance factors to enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy by comparing treatment outcomes between the early progressive disease (EPD) group and non-EPD group.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 121 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received EV monotherapy across five institutions between 2019 and 2024. The patients were categorized into the EPD group (n = 34), defined by radiologically confirmed progressive disease within 3 months of EV initiation, and the non-EPD group (n = 87). The clinical parameters and oncological outcomes were compared between groups. The emergence of new metastatic lesions was defined as the detection of metastases in organs not previously identified as metastatic sites at baseline, during prior chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) before the initiation of EV.

Results: The median overall survival was significantly shorter in the EPD group than in the non-EPD group (6.5 vs. 19.9 months, p < 0.001). The EPD group had a significantly higher incidence of new metastatic lesions and a lower prevalence of normal Hb levels. Multivariate analysis identified low Hb and the presence of new metastatic lesions as independent predictors of EPD. Among patients with new metastases in the EPD group, an average of 74% of lesions emerged during ICI treatment and 75% involved multiple foci. Notably, more than 50% of these new lesions showed progression at the same sites following EV therapy.

Conclusions: Patients with low hemoglobin levels and new metastatic lesions before EV treatment may be at increased risk for EPD. For these patients, alternative treatment strategies should be considered before initiating EV.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

转移性尿路上皮癌患者对维多汀原发耐药的相关因素:一项多中心回顾性研究
背景:通过对早期进展性疾病(EPD)组和非EPD组的治疗结果进行比较,评价对强制使用维多汀(EV)单药的主要耐药因素。方法:回顾性分析2019年至2024年间5家机构接受EV单药治疗的121例晚期尿路上皮癌患者。将患者分为EPD组(n = 34)和非EPD组(n = 87)。EPD组的定义是在EV发病3个月内影像学证实疾病进展。比较两组患者的临床参数及肿瘤预后。新转移病灶的出现被定义为:在开始EV之前,在先前的化疗或免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)期间,在基线时未被确定为转移部位的器官中检测到转移灶。结果:EPD组的中位总生存期明显短于非EPD组(6.5个月vs. 19.9个月)。结论:在EV治疗前,低血红蛋白水平和新转移灶的患者发生EPD的风险可能增加。对于这些患者,在开始EV治疗前应考虑其他治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信