Perceptions of Scientific Recommendations Mediate the Effects of Message Valence on Adult Smokers' Intention to Use E-Cigarettes to Quit: A Conditional Process Analysis.
{"title":"Perceptions of Scientific Recommendations Mediate the Effects of Message Valence on Adult Smokers' Intention to Use E-Cigarettes to Quit: A Conditional Process Analysis.","authors":"Qinghua Yang, Paul Schrodt, Jie Zhuang","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2521713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been widely used by smokers as a quitting device, the explanatory mechanisms and boundary conditions in which message characteristics influence their intention to use e-cigarettes as cessation devices remain unclear. To fill this gap, the current between-subjects experiment investigated how the valence of the messages (pro-e-cigarette, anti-e-cigarette, conflicting recommendations) current smokers are exposed to influence their intention to use e-cigarettes for smoking cessation through perceived approval of using e-cigarettes among health authorities (i.e., perceptions of scientific recommendations). Participants included 249 current smokers recruited through MTurk. Our findings identified perceptions of scientific recommendations of using e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation device mediated the relationship between message valence and smokers' intention to quit with e-cigarettes. Further, the indirect relationship is conditioned by smokers' levels of education, sex, and race/ethnicity. The findings contribute to the literature on tobacco regulatory science by illuminating heterogeneity in message effects across diverse populations and providing important guidance for science-based campaign designs and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2521713","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been widely used by smokers as a quitting device, the explanatory mechanisms and boundary conditions in which message characteristics influence their intention to use e-cigarettes as cessation devices remain unclear. To fill this gap, the current between-subjects experiment investigated how the valence of the messages (pro-e-cigarette, anti-e-cigarette, conflicting recommendations) current smokers are exposed to influence their intention to use e-cigarettes for smoking cessation through perceived approval of using e-cigarettes among health authorities (i.e., perceptions of scientific recommendations). Participants included 249 current smokers recruited through MTurk. Our findings identified perceptions of scientific recommendations of using e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation device mediated the relationship between message valence and smokers' intention to quit with e-cigarettes. Further, the indirect relationship is conditioned by smokers' levels of education, sex, and race/ethnicity. The findings contribute to the literature on tobacco regulatory science by illuminating heterogeneity in message effects across diverse populations and providing important guidance for science-based campaign designs and interventions.
期刊介绍:
As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.