Perceptions of Scientific Recommendations Mediate the Effects of Message Valence on Adult Smokers' Intention to Use E-Cigarettes to Quit: A Conditional Process Analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Qinghua Yang, Paul Schrodt, Jie Zhuang
{"title":"Perceptions of Scientific Recommendations Mediate the Effects of Message Valence on Adult Smokers' Intention to Use E-Cigarettes to Quit: A Conditional Process Analysis.","authors":"Qinghua Yang, Paul Schrodt, Jie Zhuang","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2521713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been widely used by smokers as a quitting device, the explanatory mechanisms and boundary conditions in which message characteristics influence their intention to use e-cigarettes as cessation devices remain unclear. To fill this gap, the current between-subjects experiment investigated how the valence of the messages (pro-e-cigarette, anti-e-cigarette, conflicting recommendations) current smokers are exposed to influence their intention to use e-cigarettes for smoking cessation through perceived approval of using e-cigarettes among health authorities (i.e., perceptions of scientific recommendations). Participants included 249 current smokers recruited through MTurk. Our findings identified perceptions of scientific recommendations of using e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation device mediated the relationship between message valence and smokers' intention to quit with e-cigarettes. Further, the indirect relationship is conditioned by smokers' levels of education, sex, and race/ethnicity. The findings contribute to the literature on tobacco regulatory science by illuminating heterogeneity in message effects across diverse populations and providing important guidance for science-based campaign designs and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2521713","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been widely used by smokers as a quitting device, the explanatory mechanisms and boundary conditions in which message characteristics influence their intention to use e-cigarettes as cessation devices remain unclear. To fill this gap, the current between-subjects experiment investigated how the valence of the messages (pro-e-cigarette, anti-e-cigarette, conflicting recommendations) current smokers are exposed to influence their intention to use e-cigarettes for smoking cessation through perceived approval of using e-cigarettes among health authorities (i.e., perceptions of scientific recommendations). Participants included 249 current smokers recruited through MTurk. Our findings identified perceptions of scientific recommendations of using e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation device mediated the relationship between message valence and smokers' intention to quit with e-cigarettes. Further, the indirect relationship is conditioned by smokers' levels of education, sex, and race/ethnicity. The findings contribute to the literature on tobacco regulatory science by illuminating heterogeneity in message effects across diverse populations and providing important guidance for science-based campaign designs and interventions.

对科学建议的认知介导信息价对成年吸烟者使用电子烟戒烟意图的影响:一个条件过程分析。
尽管电子烟(电子烟)已被吸烟者广泛用作戒烟工具,但信息特征影响其使用电子烟作为戒烟工具意愿的解释机制和边界条件尚不清楚。为了填补这一空白,目前的受试者间实验调查了当前吸烟者的信息(支持电子烟、反对电子烟、相互矛盾的建议)的效价如何通过卫生当局对使用电子烟的认可(即对科学建议的看法)影响他们使用电子烟戒烟的意图。参与者包括249名通过MTurk招募的吸烟者。我们的研究结果确定了对使用电子烟作为戒烟设备的科学建议的看法,介导了信息效价与吸烟者使用电子烟戒烟意图之间的关系。此外,这种间接关系受吸烟者的教育水平、性别和种族/民族的制约。这些发现阐明了在不同人群中信息效果的异质性,并为基于科学的运动设计和干预提供了重要指导,从而为烟草监管科学文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信