Coping with Loss in Caregiving: Comparing the Experiences of Dementia Family Caregivers and Parents of Medically Complex Children.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
R Amanda Cooper, Tricia J Burke, Jocelyn DeGroot
{"title":"Coping with Loss in Caregiving: Comparing the Experiences of Dementia Family Caregivers and Parents of Medically Complex Children.","authors":"R Amanda Cooper, Tricia J Burke, Jocelyn DeGroot","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2526815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Applying the dual-process model of coping with bereavement, we examined how dementia family caregivers and parents of medically complex children (MCC) experience and cope with loss on a daily basis. Integrating caregiving experiences at both ends of the lifespan revealed largely similar experiences of loss in caregiving as well as nuanced differences in grieving and coping. Using interview data from 26 dementia family caregivers and 26 MCC caregivers, the analysis revealed that both types of caregivers experience loss-orientation, restoration-orientation, and communication-based triggers that move them between the two. For dementia and MCC caregivers, loss-orientation centered on the loss of their expectations for their lives and relationships. Restoration-orientation involved reframing, perspective taking, self-growth, and finding a \"new normal.\" Loss triggers included lack of understanding from others, worsening of the medical conditions, and social comparison. Restoration triggers included social support and improvements in the patient's condition or demeanor.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2526815","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Applying the dual-process model of coping with bereavement, we examined how dementia family caregivers and parents of medically complex children (MCC) experience and cope with loss on a daily basis. Integrating caregiving experiences at both ends of the lifespan revealed largely similar experiences of loss in caregiving as well as nuanced differences in grieving and coping. Using interview data from 26 dementia family caregivers and 26 MCC caregivers, the analysis revealed that both types of caregivers experience loss-orientation, restoration-orientation, and communication-based triggers that move them between the two. For dementia and MCC caregivers, loss-orientation centered on the loss of their expectations for their lives and relationships. Restoration-orientation involved reframing, perspective taking, self-growth, and finding a "new normal." Loss triggers included lack of understanding from others, worsening of the medical conditions, and social comparison. Restoration triggers included social support and improvements in the patient's condition or demeanor.

应对照顾中的损失:比较痴呆家庭照顾者和医疗复杂儿童父母的经验。
运用应对丧亲的双过程模型,我们研究了痴呆症家庭照顾者和医学复杂儿童(MCC)的父母如何在日常生活中经历和应对丧亲。在生命的两端整合照顾经历,揭示了在照顾中失去的大部分相似经历,以及在悲伤和应对方面的细微差异。通过对26名痴呆症家庭护理人员和26名MCC护理人员的访谈数据,分析显示,这两种类型的护理人员都经历了损失导向、恢复导向和基于沟通的触发因素,使他们在两者之间移动。对于痴呆症和MCC护理人员来说,损失导向主要是他们对生活和人际关系的期望的丧失。恢复导向包括重构、透视、自我成长和寻找“新常态”。失去的诱因包括缺乏他人的理解、医疗状况的恶化和社会比较。恢复触发因素包括社会支持和患者状况或行为的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信