Efficacy and safety of Mitapivat in sickle cell disease: a systematic review.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI:10.1080/14656566.2025.2514504
Shalu R Chaudhary, Komal Sharma, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Deepak B Saxena
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of Mitapivat in sickle cell disease: a systematic review.","authors":"Shalu R Chaudhary, Komal Sharma, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Deepak B Saxena","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2025.2514504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a chronic hemoglobinopathy marked by hemolytic anemia, VOEs, and multiorgan complications. Mitapivat, an oral Pyruvate Kinase (PK) activator, has emerged as a potential disease-modifying therapy. This systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of Mitapivat in individuals with SCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted from different search engines from inception. The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD420251000061]. RCTs and NRSIs evaluating Mitapivat monotherapy were included. ROB was assessed. A narrative synthesis was undertaken due to heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One RCT and two NRSIs involving 156 participants were included. Reduced annualized Vaso-occlusive episodes (VOE) rates compared to placebo by 51.6% (50 mg) and 70.0% (100 mg). Statistically significant hemoglobin response was observed in 46.2%-56% of participants. Increased markers of hemolysis and reduced transfusion requirements in Mitapivat groups were reported. However, SAEs were low, in 8%-19% of Mitapivat recipients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary evidence suggests Mitapivat demonstrates potential to reduce VOEs, improve hemoglobin levels, and decrease hemolysis with an acceptable safety profile. However, small sample sizes, lack of functional outcomes, and limited follow-up warrant cautious interpretation. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to validate these findings and establish a long-term benefit-risk balance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1229-1236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2025.2514504","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a chronic hemoglobinopathy marked by hemolytic anemia, VOEs, and multiorgan complications. Mitapivat, an oral Pyruvate Kinase (PK) activator, has emerged as a potential disease-modifying therapy. This systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of Mitapivat in individuals with SCD.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted from different search engines from inception. The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD420251000061]. RCTs and NRSIs evaluating Mitapivat monotherapy were included. ROB was assessed. A narrative synthesis was undertaken due to heterogeneity.

Results: One RCT and two NRSIs involving 156 participants were included. Reduced annualized Vaso-occlusive episodes (VOE) rates compared to placebo by 51.6% (50 mg) and 70.0% (100 mg). Statistically significant hemoglobin response was observed in 46.2%-56% of participants. Increased markers of hemolysis and reduced transfusion requirements in Mitapivat groups were reported. However, SAEs were low, in 8%-19% of Mitapivat recipients.

Conclusions: Preliminary evidence suggests Mitapivat demonstrates potential to reduce VOEs, improve hemoglobin levels, and decrease hemolysis with an acceptable safety profile. However, small sample sizes, lack of functional outcomes, and limited follow-up warrant cautious interpretation. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to validate these findings and establish a long-term benefit-risk balance.

米他伐治疗镰状细胞病的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述。
背景:镰状细胞病(SCD)是一种以溶血性贫血、VOEs和多器官并发症为特征的慢性血红蛋白病。米他伐特是一种口服丙酮酸激酶(PK)激活剂,已成为一种潜在的疾病改善疗法。本系统综述评估了米他伐在SCD患者中的有效性和安全性。方法:系统检索PubMed、谷歌Scholar和WHO ICTRP的相关文献。审查遵循PRISMA 2020指南,该方案已在PROSPERO注册[CRD420251000061]。纳入评价米他伐单药治疗的rct和nrsi。评估ROB。由于异质性,进行了叙事综合。结果:纳入1项随机对照试验(RCT)和2项非随机干预研究(NRSIs),涉及156名受试者。与安慰剂相比,米他伐特降低了年化血管闭塞发作(VOE)率51.6% (50 mg)和70.0% (100 mg)。在46.2%-56%的参与者中观察到有统计学意义的血红蛋白反应。据报道,米他伐特组溶血标志物增加,输血需求减少。所有的研究都报告了不良事件,主要是轻度到中度的严重程度。然而,与对照组相比,米他维特受者的SAEs较低,为8%-19%。结论:初步证据表明,Mitapivat具有降低VOEs、改善血红蛋白水平和减少溶血的潜力,且具有可接受的安全性。然而,样本量小,缺乏功能结果,随访有限,需要谨慎解释。需要进一步的大规模随机对照试验来验证这些发现并建立长期的利益风险平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on newly approved/near to launch compounds mainly of chemical/synthetic origin, providing expert opinion on the likely impact of these new agents on existing pharmacotherapy of specific diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信