Maria Angela Tosca, Chiara Ferrecchi, Talia D'ambrosio, Matteo Naso, Chiara Trincianti, Mattia Giovannini, Giorgio Ciprandi
{"title":"Predicting and overcoming poor patient responses to sublingual immunotherapy for allergic diseases.","authors":"Maria Angela Tosca, Chiara Ferrecchi, Talia D'ambrosio, Matteo Naso, Chiara Trincianti, Mattia Giovannini, Giorgio Ciprandi","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2531035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment for allergic rhinitis and asthma. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is commonly used in clinical practice. Although its effectiveness has been proven in randomized controlled trials and real-world studies, poor or no responses may occur in some cases.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The present review aims to summarize the main possible factors involved in ineffective SLIT treatment, including immunological mechanisms, molecular and diagnostic errors, non-purified extracts, inadequate dosage, and patients' intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics. Possible remedies are also reported to predict and overcome poor patient response to guarantee optimal treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Identifying the reason for SLIT ineffectiveness is clinically relevant. Allergologists should carefully investigate the possible cause of poor or no response to SLIT. Identification is important as the potential removal of the interfering problems might allow SLIT to continue. The most common causes of poor SLIT efficacy include diagnostic errors, incorrect allergen dosage and schedule, poor quality extract, comorbidity, impaired immune system function, and inadequate adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"821-833"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2531035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment for allergic rhinitis and asthma. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is commonly used in clinical practice. Although its effectiveness has been proven in randomized controlled trials and real-world studies, poor or no responses may occur in some cases.
Areas covered: The present review aims to summarize the main possible factors involved in ineffective SLIT treatment, including immunological mechanisms, molecular and diagnostic errors, non-purified extracts, inadequate dosage, and patients' intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics. Possible remedies are also reported to predict and overcome poor patient response to guarantee optimal treatment efficacy.
Expert opinion: Identifying the reason for SLIT ineffectiveness is clinically relevant. Allergologists should carefully investigate the possible cause of poor or no response to SLIT. Identification is important as the potential removal of the interfering problems might allow SLIT to continue. The most common causes of poor SLIT efficacy include diagnostic errors, incorrect allergen dosage and schedule, poor quality extract, comorbidity, impaired immune system function, and inadequate adherence.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy.
Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development.
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease.
The journal welcomes:
Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine
Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent
Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results;
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.