Novel brace with long-duration neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Yi-Hsuan Weng, Chon-Kio Wong, Yang-Ting Chien, Jing-Lan Yang, Chung-Hsun Chang, Jiu-Jenq Lin
{"title":"Novel brace with long-duration neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yi-Hsuan Weng, Chon-Kio Wong, Yang-Ting Chien, Jing-Lan Yang, Chung-Hsun Chang, Jiu-Jenq Lin","doi":"10.1177/02692155251356455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of exercise with a long-duration neuromuscular electrical stimulation brace compared to exercise alone in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears.DesignA prospective randomized controlled trial.SettingResearch laboratory.ParticipantsPatients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were randomized into the experimental (<i>n</i> = 21) or exercise-only group (<i>n</i> = 21).InterventionBoth groups completed exercises daily for 6 weeks, with the experimental group receiving neuromuscular electrical stimulation during exercises.Main measuresFunction, pain, strength, and scapular biomechanics (arm raising and lowering).ResultsThe principal outcome showed no differences between groups in function, pain, or strength at 3 and 6 weeks. However, the experimental group exhibited significantly less posterior tilt (6.3 ± 2.9°, <i>p</i> = 0.006) at week 3 and reduced upper trapezius (6.0%-19.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.017) and serratus anterior (15.3%-20.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.009-0.016) activation at weeks 3 and 6. The within-group comparison showed pain (1.8 ± 0.4, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and strength (6.5-9.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.007) improved in the experimental group by week 3, while the exercise-only group showed strength gains (3.4-10.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) from weeks 3 to 6. Both groups demonstrated decreased upward rotation (2.1° ± 0.8°, <i>p</i> = 0.042), whereas the experimental group showed decreased muscle activation (2.0-10.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.03) after training.ConclusionsDespite a 6-week exercise program with long-duration neuromuscular electrical stimulation, no significant group differences were observed in function, pain, or strength at 3 or 6 weeks. However, secondary analyses indicated reduced scapular compensation and early pain and strength improvements in the experimental group.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155251356455"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251356455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of exercise with a long-duration neuromuscular electrical stimulation brace compared to exercise alone in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears.DesignA prospective randomized controlled trial.SettingResearch laboratory.ParticipantsPatients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were randomized into the experimental (n = 21) or exercise-only group (n = 21).InterventionBoth groups completed exercises daily for 6 weeks, with the experimental group receiving neuromuscular electrical stimulation during exercises.Main measuresFunction, pain, strength, and scapular biomechanics (arm raising and lowering).ResultsThe principal outcome showed no differences between groups in function, pain, or strength at 3 and 6 weeks. However, the experimental group exhibited significantly less posterior tilt (6.3 ± 2.9°, p = 0.006) at week 3 and reduced upper trapezius (6.0%-19.0%, p = 0.017) and serratus anterior (15.3%-20.4%, p = 0.009-0.016) activation at weeks 3 and 6. The within-group comparison showed pain (1.8 ± 0.4, p < 0.001) and strength (6.5-9.4%, p < 0.007) improved in the experimental group by week 3, while the exercise-only group showed strength gains (3.4-10.1%, p < 0.01) from weeks 3 to 6. Both groups demonstrated decreased upward rotation (2.1° ± 0.8°, p = 0.042), whereas the experimental group showed decreased muscle activation (2.0-10.5%, p < 0.03) after training.ConclusionsDespite a 6-week exercise program with long-duration neuromuscular electrical stimulation, no significant group differences were observed in function, pain, or strength at 3 or 6 weeks. However, secondary analyses indicated reduced scapular compensation and early pain and strength improvements in the experimental group.

新型支架与长时间神经肌肉电刺激患者全层肩袖撕裂:一项随机对照试验。
目的评价长时间神经肌肉电刺激支具运动与单纯运动治疗肩袖全层撕裂的疗效。设计一项前瞻性随机对照试验。SettingResearch实验室。全层肩袖撕裂的患者被随机分为实验组(n = 21)和单纯运动组(n = 21)。干预措施:两组均完成每日运动,为期6周,实验组在运动中接受神经肌肉电刺激。主要测量功能、疼痛、力量和肩胛骨生物力学(手臂升降)。结果3周和6周时,两组在功能、疼痛或力量方面没有差异。然而,实验组在第3周表现出明显减少的后倾角(6.3±2.9°,p = 0.006),并在第3周和第6周降低了上斜方肌(6.0%-19.0%,p = 0.017)和前锯肌(15.3%-20.4%,p = 0.009-0.016)的激活。组内比较显示疼痛(1.8±0.4,p p p p = 0.042),而实验组显示肌肉激活降低(2.0-10.5%,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信