Prehospital respiratory interventions during six waves of COVID-19: results from Israel's Emergency Medical Services system.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Maximilian P Nerlander, Evan Avraham Alpert, Roman Sonkin, Ziv Dadon, Ari M Lipsky, Eli Jaffe
{"title":"Prehospital respiratory interventions during six waves of COVID-19: results from Israel's Emergency Medical Services system.","authors":"Maximilian P Nerlander, Evan Avraham Alpert, Roman Sonkin, Ziv Dadon, Ari M Lipsky, Eli Jaffe","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01279-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite COVID-19 having been the subject of extensive scientific research, there is a paucity of studies on the respiratory management needs of patients in the pre-hospital setting. This retrospective cohort study utilizes data from Magen David Adom (MDA), Israel's Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to investigate how prehospital respiratory management needs changed throughout the first six waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All EMS responses due to respiratory complaints, from March 21, 2020, to July 31, 2022, were included. Odds ratios (ORs) for each wave were calculated for each intervention with the previous wave as reference. Wave 1 (W1) was compared to a pre-pandemic period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 141,027 responses. Throughout the pandemic, no endotracheal intubations were performed. The use of mask-based 90% FiO<sub>2</sub> decreased from the pre-COVID-19 period to W1 (OR 0.61, p < 0.0001), increased during waves 2-3 (OR 1.24, p < 0.0001 [W2]; OR 1.11, p < 0.0001 [W3]), and plateaued throughout W5 and W6 (OR 0.99, p = 0.71 [W5]; OR 0.01, p = 0.8 [W6]). The use of nasal cannula increased throughout the six waves (OR 1.2 [W1]; OR 1.48 [W2]; 1.39 [W3]; OR 1.45 [W4]; 1.11 [W5]; 1.24 [W6], p < 0.05). The use of nebulized bronchodilators decreased from the pre-pandemic period to W1 (OR 0.41, p < 0.0001). From W3 to W6, the use increased significantly for each wave (OR 1.43 [W4]; OR 1.12 [W5]; 1.31 [W6], p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDA advised staff not to perform endotracheal intubations during the pandemic due to concerns of transmission through aerosol. Similarly, the initial drops in high-concentration O2 and nebulized bronchodilators may be due to concerns with its aerosolizing potential. The gradual replacement of high-concentration prehospital oxygen by mask with nasal cannulas over the pandemic waves may be due to the decreased pathogenicity of the new strains and expanded vaccination coverage. The increased use of nebulized bronchodilators seen during the latter waves may be due to the re-emergence of non-covid pathogens with greater bronchoconstrictive effect as social restrictions were eased. Further, as vaccine coverage expanded among providers over time, these may have been more comfortable administering bronchodilators.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01279-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite COVID-19 having been the subject of extensive scientific research, there is a paucity of studies on the respiratory management needs of patients in the pre-hospital setting. This retrospective cohort study utilizes data from Magen David Adom (MDA), Israel's Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to investigate how prehospital respiratory management needs changed throughout the first six waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel.

Methods: All EMS responses due to respiratory complaints, from March 21, 2020, to July 31, 2022, were included. Odds ratios (ORs) for each wave were calculated for each intervention with the previous wave as reference. Wave 1 (W1) was compared to a pre-pandemic period.

Results: The study included 141,027 responses. Throughout the pandemic, no endotracheal intubations were performed. The use of mask-based 90% FiO2 decreased from the pre-COVID-19 period to W1 (OR 0.61, p < 0.0001), increased during waves 2-3 (OR 1.24, p < 0.0001 [W2]; OR 1.11, p < 0.0001 [W3]), and plateaued throughout W5 and W6 (OR 0.99, p = 0.71 [W5]; OR 0.01, p = 0.8 [W6]). The use of nasal cannula increased throughout the six waves (OR 1.2 [W1]; OR 1.48 [W2]; 1.39 [W3]; OR 1.45 [W4]; 1.11 [W5]; 1.24 [W6], p < 0.05). The use of nebulized bronchodilators decreased from the pre-pandemic period to W1 (OR 0.41, p < 0.0001). From W3 to W6, the use increased significantly for each wave (OR 1.43 [W4]; OR 1.12 [W5]; 1.31 [W6], p < 0.05).

Conclusions: MDA advised staff not to perform endotracheal intubations during the pandemic due to concerns of transmission through aerosol. Similarly, the initial drops in high-concentration O2 and nebulized bronchodilators may be due to concerns with its aerosolizing potential. The gradual replacement of high-concentration prehospital oxygen by mask with nasal cannulas over the pandemic waves may be due to the decreased pathogenicity of the new strains and expanded vaccination coverage. The increased use of nebulized bronchodilators seen during the latter waves may be due to the re-emergence of non-covid pathogens with greater bronchoconstrictive effect as social restrictions were eased. Further, as vaccine coverage expanded among providers over time, these may have been more comfortable administering bronchodilators.

六波COVID-19期间的院前呼吸干预:来自以色列紧急医疗服务系统的结果
背景:尽管COVID-19已经成为广泛科学研究的主题,但关于院前患者呼吸管理需求的研究却很缺乏。这项回顾性队列研究利用以色列紧急医疗服务(EMS)的数据,调查在以色列COVID-19大流行的前六波期间,院前呼吸管理需求是如何变化的。方法:纳入2020年3月21日至2022年7月31日期间因呼吸系统疾病引起的所有EMS应答。以前一波为参考,计算每一波干预的优势比(ORs)。将第一波(W1)与大流行前时期进行比较。结果:该研究包括141,027份回复。在大流行期间,没有进行气管插管。基于口罩的90% FiO2的使用从covid -19前时期下降到W1 (OR 0.61, p)。结论:由于担心通过气溶胶传播,MDA建议工作人员在大流行期间不要进行气管插管。同样,高浓度O2和雾化支气管扩张剂的初始下降可能是由于对其雾化潜力的担忧。在大流行期间,用口罩和鼻套管逐渐取代高浓度院前氧气可能是由于新菌株致病性降低和疫苗接种覆盖率扩大。在后一波疫情中,雾化支气管扩张剂的使用增加,可能是由于随着社会限制的放松,具有更大支气管收缩作用的非covid - 19病原体重新出现。此外,随着时间的推移,随着疫苗覆盖率的扩大,这些提供者可能更容易使用支气管扩张剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信