Increasing Utilization of Palliative Care is Associated With Reduced Health Care Costs in Operative Trauma: A National Analysis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Syed Shaheer Ali, Amulya Vadlakonda, Konmal Ali, Troy Coaston, Saad Mallick, Nam Yong Cho, Esteban Aguayo, Peyman Benharash, On Behalf Of The Academic Trauma Research Consortium Atrium
{"title":"Increasing Utilization of Palliative Care is Associated With Reduced Health Care Costs in Operative Trauma: A National Analysis.","authors":"Syed Shaheer Ali, Amulya Vadlakonda, Konmal Ali, Troy Coaston, Saad Mallick, Nam Yong Cho, Esteban Aguayo, Peyman Benharash, On Behalf Of The Academic Trauma Research Consortium Atrium","doi":"10.1177/00031348251359119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionPalliative care (PC) has been shown to improve comfort for surgical patients nearing the end of life. Although single-institution studies suggest PC to be a cost-effective strategy, the contemporary national trends in costs and utilization of this modality remain unknown.MethodsAdult patients (≥18 years) who did not survive following hospitalization for surgical management of traumatic injury were tabulated in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients were stratified by receipt of PC. Entropy balancing on key covariates was used to ensure an equivalent comparison of groups. A multivariable linear regression model was constructed to assess the association between PC and hospitalization costs per day across quintiles of injury severity.ResultsOf an estimated 56 431 patients who did not survive hospitalization for traumatic injury, 43.7% received PC. Compared to others, those receiving PC were older (77 [64-87] vs 73 years [55-85], <i>P</i> < 0.001), insured by Medicare (65.3 vs 58.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and had a higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (4 [3-6] vs 4 [2-6], <i>P</i> < 0.001). Following multivariable adjustment and entropy balancing, PC was associated with a decrement in daily costs (β, $1,300, 95% confidence interval -1500 to -1,000, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Such difference was greatest among those in the highest quintile of injury severity.ConclusionWe demonstrate a potential cost benefit to the utilization of PC for trauma patients nearing end of life. In the context of known benefits of PC to quality of life for acutely ill patients, our findings highlight the economic feasibility of integrating PC into trauma services.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251359119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251359119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionPalliative care (PC) has been shown to improve comfort for surgical patients nearing the end of life. Although single-institution studies suggest PC to be a cost-effective strategy, the contemporary national trends in costs and utilization of this modality remain unknown.MethodsAdult patients (≥18 years) who did not survive following hospitalization for surgical management of traumatic injury were tabulated in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients were stratified by receipt of PC. Entropy balancing on key covariates was used to ensure an equivalent comparison of groups. A multivariable linear regression model was constructed to assess the association between PC and hospitalization costs per day across quintiles of injury severity.ResultsOf an estimated 56 431 patients who did not survive hospitalization for traumatic injury, 43.7% received PC. Compared to others, those receiving PC were older (77 [64-87] vs 73 years [55-85], P < 0.001), insured by Medicare (65.3 vs 58.6%, P < 0.001), and had a higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (4 [3-6] vs 4 [2-6], P < 0.001). Following multivariable adjustment and entropy balancing, PC was associated with a decrement in daily costs (β, $1,300, 95% confidence interval -1500 to -1,000, P < 0.001). Such difference was greatest among those in the highest quintile of injury severity.ConclusionWe demonstrate a potential cost benefit to the utilization of PC for trauma patients nearing end of life. In the context of known benefits of PC to quality of life for acutely ill patients, our findings highlight the economic feasibility of integrating PC into trauma services.

增加姑息治疗的使用与手术创伤中医疗保健费用的降低有关:一项国家分析。
导读:姑息治疗(PC)已被证明可以改善手术患者接近生命末期的舒适度。虽然单一机构的研究表明,个人方案是一种成本效益高的战略,但目前国家在这种方式的成本和利用方面的趋势仍然未知。方法将2016 - 2020年全国再入院数据库中创伤性损伤手术治疗后未能存活的成年患者(≥18岁)进行统计。通过接受PC对患者进行分层。使用关键协变量的熵平衡来确保组间的等效比较。构建了一个多变量线性回归模型来评估PC与损伤严重程度五分位数每天住院费用之间的关系。结果56 431例外伤性住院患者中,43.7%接受了PC治疗。与其他患者相比,接受PC治疗的患者年龄较大(77 [64-87]vs 73 [55-85], P < 0.001),参加医疗保险(65.3 vs 58.6%, P < 0.001), Elixhauser合并症指数较高(4 [3-6]vs 4 [2-6], P < 0.001)。在多变量调整和熵平衡之后,PC与日常成本的减少有关(β, 1,300美元,95%置信区间- 1,500至-1,000,P < 0.001)。这种差异在损伤严重程度最高的五分位数中最大。结论:我们证明了在接近生命末期的创伤患者中使用PC具有潜在的成本效益。在已知PC对急性患者生活质量的益处的背景下,我们的研究结果强调了将PC整合到创伤服务中的经济可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信