The Moderating Role of Societal Cultural Values and Practices on the Relationship Between Workplace Aggression and Employee Engagement

IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Anthony Rafferty
{"title":"The Moderating Role of Societal Cultural Values and Practices on the Relationship Between Workplace Aggression and Employee Engagement","authors":"Anthony Rafferty","doi":"10.1111/1748-8583.12593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article investigates the relationship between societal culture, the self-reported incidence of workplace aggression and its effects on employee engagement. While justice-based accounts emphasise the role of cultural values and attributional models focus on cultural practices, the Focus Theory of Normative Conduct is applied to understand how both cultural values and practices may influence employee outcomes. Utilising the GLOBE survey measures, a nationally representative study of 20 countries was conducted. Results indicate that higher levels of power distance, assertiveness, institutional collectivism, and in-group collectivism—in terms of both values and practices—are associated with lower self-reported workplace aggression. Moderation analyses revealed a greater negative effect of aggression on employee engagement in societies scoring higher on power distance or assertiveness values and practices and in-group collectivism practices, while such effects were lower in countries with higher institutional collectivist practices or in-group collectivist values. Implications for cross-cultural human resource management and workplace interventions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47916,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management Journal","volume":"35 3","pages":"754-765"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1748-8583.12593","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1748-8583.12593","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the relationship between societal culture, the self-reported incidence of workplace aggression and its effects on employee engagement. While justice-based accounts emphasise the role of cultural values and attributional models focus on cultural practices, the Focus Theory of Normative Conduct is applied to understand how both cultural values and practices may influence employee outcomes. Utilising the GLOBE survey measures, a nationally representative study of 20 countries was conducted. Results indicate that higher levels of power distance, assertiveness, institutional collectivism, and in-group collectivism—in terms of both values and practices—are associated with lower self-reported workplace aggression. Moderation analyses revealed a greater negative effect of aggression on employee engagement in societies scoring higher on power distance or assertiveness values and practices and in-group collectivism practices, while such effects were lower in countries with higher institutional collectivist practices or in-group collectivist values. Implications for cross-cultural human resource management and workplace interventions are discussed.

Abstract Image

社会文化价值观与实践对工作场所攻击与员工敬业度关系的调节作用
本文研究了社会文化、职场攻击自我报告发生率及其对员工敬业度的影响之间的关系。虽然基于公正的解释强调文化价值观的作用,而归因模型侧重于文化实践,但规范行为的焦点理论被应用于理解文化价值观和实践如何影响员工的结果。利用全球调查措施,对20个国家进行了具有全国代表性的研究。结果表明,较高水平的权力距离、自信、制度集体主义和群体内集体主义——在价值观和实践方面——与较低的自我报告的工作场所攻击性有关。适度分析显示,在权力距离或自信价值观和实践以及群体内集体主义实践得分较高的社会中,侵略性对员工敬业度的负面影响更大,而在制度集体主义实践或群体内集体主义价值观较高的国家中,这种影响较低。讨论了跨文化人力资源管理和工作场所干预的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.90%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Human Resource Management Journal (CABS/AJG 4*) is a globally orientated HRM journal that promotes the understanding of human resource management to academics and practicing managers. We provide an international forum for discussion and debate, and stress the critical importance of people management to wider economic, political and social concerns. Endorsed by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, HRMJ is essential reading for everyone involved in personnel management, training, industrial relations, employment and human resource management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信