CONCEPTUALISING THE PEDAGOGUE AS WANDERER: WILHELM GENAZINO'S WENN WIR TIERE WÄREN (2011) AND FELICITAS HOPPE'S PIGAFETTA (1999)

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN
Daniela Dora, Mary Cosgrove
{"title":"CONCEPTUALISING THE PEDAGOGUE AS WANDERER: WILHELM GENAZINO'S WENN WIR TIERE WÄREN (2011) AND FELICITAS HOPPE'S PIGAFETTA (1999)","authors":"Daniela Dora,&nbsp;Mary Cosgrove","doi":"10.1111/glal.12443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Our paper contemplates wanderer figures in literature as inspiration for rethinking the academic as pedagogue and the practice of reading in the context of ongoing ecological uncertainties. Academia is permeated by performance pressure in teaching and research. By prioritising productivity, growth and speed, universities are complicit with the anthropocentric values of fossil-fuel culture. Against this we reimagine the pedagogue as a wild/rewilding wanderer who deviates from institutional norms and reads their environment differently by moving through space. For the ‘wild’ pedagogue, the seminar room becomes a mobile space where minds can wander, fostering creativity and new insights. The wanderers we discuss in texts by Wilhelm Genazino — <i>Wenn wir Tiere wären</i> (2011) — and Felicitas Hoppe — <i>Pigafetta</i> (1999) — move through space in this way. Genazino explores human/non-human relationships from a resisting space of deliberately unproductive perambulation, while <i>Pigafetta</i> attempts to re-mystify the planet in the era of globalisation. Both texts model close, attentive reading through the looking practices of their protagonists. By means of radical philology, which fuses poetological and hermeneutic approaches to literature, and the close reading it necessitates, we trace an imaginary path from text to reimagined pedagogical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54012,"journal":{"name":"GERMAN LIFE AND LETTERS","volume":"78 3","pages":"304-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/glal.12443","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERMAN LIFE AND LETTERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/glal.12443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our paper contemplates wanderer figures in literature as inspiration for rethinking the academic as pedagogue and the practice of reading in the context of ongoing ecological uncertainties. Academia is permeated by performance pressure in teaching and research. By prioritising productivity, growth and speed, universities are complicit with the anthropocentric values of fossil-fuel culture. Against this we reimagine the pedagogue as a wild/rewilding wanderer who deviates from institutional norms and reads their environment differently by moving through space. For the ‘wild’ pedagogue, the seminar room becomes a mobile space where minds can wander, fostering creativity and new insights. The wanderers we discuss in texts by Wilhelm Genazino — Wenn wir Tiere wären (2011) — and Felicitas Hoppe — Pigafetta (1999) — move through space in this way. Genazino explores human/non-human relationships from a resisting space of deliberately unproductive perambulation, while Pigafetta attempts to re-mystify the planet in the era of globalisation. Both texts model close, attentive reading through the looking practices of their protagonists. By means of radical philology, which fuses poetological and hermeneutic approaches to literature, and the close reading it necessitates, we trace an imaginary path from text to reimagined pedagogical practice.

将教育者概念化为漫游者:威廉·格纳齐诺的《wenn wir tiere wÄren》(2011)和费利西塔斯·霍普的《pigafetta》(1999)
我们的论文将文学中的流浪人物视为在持续的生态不确定性背景下重新思考学术作为教育者和阅读实践的灵感。学术界在教学和研究中弥漫着绩效压力。通过优先考虑生产力、增长和速度,大学与化石燃料文化的人类中心主义价值观沆瀣一气。与此相反,我们将教育者重新想象为一个野生/重新野生的流浪者,他们偏离了制度规范,通过在空间中移动来以不同的方式阅读他们的环境。对于“狂野”的教师来说,研讨室变成了一个移动的空间,思想可以在这里游荡,培养创造力和新的见解。我们在Wilhelm Genazino - Wenn wir Tiere wären(2011)和Felicitas Hoppe - Pigafetta(1999)的文本中讨论的流浪者就是以这种方式在空间中移动的。Genazino探索了人类与非人类之间的关系,这是一种刻意的非生产性漫步空间,而Pigafetta试图在全球化时代重新神秘化地球。这两篇文章都通过主人公的外表实践来塑造亲密而专注的阅读。通过激进的文字学,它融合了诗学和解释学的文学方法,以及它所必需的细读,我们追踪了一条想象的路径,从文本到重新想象的教学实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GERMAN LIFE AND LETTERS
GERMAN LIFE AND LETTERS LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: - German Life and Letters was founded in 1936 by the distinguished British Germanist L.A. Willoughby and the publisher Basil Blackwell. In its first number the journal described its aim as "engagement with German culture in its widest aspects: its history, literature, religion, music, art; with German life in general". German LIfe and Letters has continued over the decades to observe its founding principles of providing an international and interdisciplinary forum for scholarly analysis of German culture past and present. The journal appears four times a year, and a typical number contains around eight articles of between six and eight thousand words each.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信