Comparative Assessment of CNN and Transformer U-Nets in Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation

IF 2.5 4区 计算机科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Beytullah Sarica, Yunus Serhat Bicakci, Dursun Zafer Seker
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of CNN and Transformer U-Nets in Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation","authors":"Beytullah Sarica,&nbsp;Yunus Serhat Bicakci,&nbsp;Dursun Zafer Seker","doi":"10.1002/ima.70146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease that causes lesions in the central nervous system. Accurate segmentation and quantification of these lesions are essential to monitor disease progression and evaluate treatments. Several architectures are used for such studies, the most popular being U-Net-based models. Therefore, this study compares CNN-based and Transformer-based U-Net architectures for MS lesion segmentation. Six U-Net architectures based on CNN and transformer, namely U-Net, R2U-Net, V-Net, Attention U-Net, TransUNet, and SwinUNet, were trained and evaluated on two MS datasets, ISBI2015 and MSSEG2016. T1-w, T2-w, and FLAIR sequences were jointly used to obtain more detailed features. A hybrid loss function, which involves the addition of focal Tversky and Dice losses, was exploited to improve the performance of models. This study was carried out in three steps. First, each model was trained separately and evaluated in each dataset. Second, each model was trained on the ISBI2015 dataset and evaluated on the MSSEG2016 dataset and vice versa. Finally, these two datasets were combined to increase the training samples and assessed on the ISBI2015 dataset. Accordingly, the R2U-Net and the V-Net models (CNN-based) achieved the best ISBI scores among the other models. The R2U-Net model achieved the best ISBI scores in the first and last steps with average scores of 92.82 and 92.91, while the V-Net model achieved the best ISBI score in the second step with an average score of 91.28. Our results show that CNN-based models surpass the Transformer-based U-Net models in most metrics for MS lesion segmentation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14027,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology","volume":"35 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ima.70146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease that causes lesions in the central nervous system. Accurate segmentation and quantification of these lesions are essential to monitor disease progression and evaluate treatments. Several architectures are used for such studies, the most popular being U-Net-based models. Therefore, this study compares CNN-based and Transformer-based U-Net architectures for MS lesion segmentation. Six U-Net architectures based on CNN and transformer, namely U-Net, R2U-Net, V-Net, Attention U-Net, TransUNet, and SwinUNet, were trained and evaluated on two MS datasets, ISBI2015 and MSSEG2016. T1-w, T2-w, and FLAIR sequences were jointly used to obtain more detailed features. A hybrid loss function, which involves the addition of focal Tversky and Dice losses, was exploited to improve the performance of models. This study was carried out in three steps. First, each model was trained separately and evaluated in each dataset. Second, each model was trained on the ISBI2015 dataset and evaluated on the MSSEG2016 dataset and vice versa. Finally, these two datasets were combined to increase the training samples and assessed on the ISBI2015 dataset. Accordingly, the R2U-Net and the V-Net models (CNN-based) achieved the best ISBI scores among the other models. The R2U-Net model achieved the best ISBI scores in the first and last steps with average scores of 92.82 and 92.91, while the V-Net model achieved the best ISBI score in the second step with an average score of 91.28. Our results show that CNN-based models surpass the Transformer-based U-Net models in most metrics for MS lesion segmentation.

CNN与Transformer U-Nets在多发性硬化症病灶分割中的比较评价
多发性硬化症(MS)是一种慢性自身免疫性疾病,导致中枢神经系统病变。准确分割和量化这些病变是必不可少的监测疾病进展和评估治疗。这类研究使用了几种体系结构,最流行的是基于u - net的模型。因此,本研究比较了基于cnn和基于transformer的U-Net架构对MS病变的分割。在ISBI2015和MSSEG2016两个MS数据集上,对基于CNN和transformer的6种U-Net架构U-Net、R2U-Net、V-Net、Attention U-Net、TransUNet和SwinUNet进行了训练和评估。T1-w、T2-w和FLAIR序列联合使用,获得更详细的特征。利用混合损失函数,其中包括焦点Tversky和Dice损失的增加,以提高模型的性能。本研究分三步进行。首先,对每个模型分别进行训练,并在每个数据集中进行评估。其次,每个模型在ISBI2015数据集上进行训练,并在MSSEG2016数据集上进行评估,反之亦然。最后,将这两个数据集结合起来增加训练样本,并在ISBI2015数据集上进行评估。因此,R2U-Net和V-Net模型(基于cnn)在其他模型中获得了最好的ISBI分数。R2U-Net模型在第一步和最后一步的ISBI得分最高,平均得分分别为92.82和92.91,而V-Net模型在第二步的ISBI得分最高,平均得分为91.28。我们的研究结果表明,基于cnn的模型在大多数MS病变分割指标上都优于基于transformer的U-Net模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology
International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology 工程技术-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology (IMA) is a forum for the exchange of ideas and results relevant to imaging systems, including imaging physics and informatics. The journal covers all imaging modalities in humans and animals. IMA accepts technically sound and scientifically rigorous research in the interdisciplinary field of imaging, including relevant algorithmic research and hardware and software development, and their applications relevant to medical research. The journal provides a platform to publish original research in structural and functional imaging. The journal is also open to imaging studies of the human body and on animals that describe novel diagnostic imaging and analyses methods. Technical, theoretical, and clinical research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Submissions describing methods, software, databases, replication studies as well as negative results are also considered. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to, the following in the context of biomedical research: Imaging and neuro-imaging modalities: structural MRI, functional MRI, PET, SPECT, CT, ultrasound, EEG, MEG, NIRS etc.; Neuromodulation and brain stimulation techniques such as TMS and tDCS; Software and hardware for imaging, especially related to human and animal health; Image segmentation in normal and clinical populations; Pattern analysis and classification using machine learning techniques; Computational modeling and analysis; Brain connectivity and connectomics; Systems-level characterization of brain function; Neural networks and neurorobotics; Computer vision, based on human/animal physiology; Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology; Big data, databasing and data mining.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信