Integrating Ideological and Political Education Elements Into the Advanced Nursing Practice Course

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-07-06 DOI:10.1111/jep.70142

Xiuying Ren, Jianlong Han, Liqing Zhu, Haiyan Jing, Qing Li, Shuling He

{"title":"Integrating Ideological and Political Education Elements Into the Advanced Nursing Practice Course","authors":"Xiuying Ren, Jianlong Han, Liqing Zhu, Haiyan Jing, Qing Li, Shuling He","doi":"10.1111/jep.70142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the effectiveness of integrating ideological and political education elements into advanced nursing practice courses for nursing master's students.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This is a nonequivalent posttest design study. The study selected 24 nursing Master's students who took the advanced nursing practice course between 2023 and 2024 as the experimental group, and nursing Master's students who completed the advanced nursing practice course between 2021 and 2022 as the control group. The experimental group (25 students) received classroom instruction integrated with ideological and political elements, while the control group received traditional classroom teaching. The study compares the academic performance, learning stress and fatigue, critical thinking ability and satisfaction of the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The experimental group's academic performance (84.71 ± 2.76) was significantly higher than that of the control group (75.44 ± 3.84), (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared to the control group, students in the experimental group received higher learning feedback and exhibited lower levels of excessive engagement, although there was no significant difference in overall effort between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.61). The experimental group's critical thinking ability (151.83 ± 4.48) was significantly higher than that of the control group (128.88 ± 5.24), (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Students in the experimental group also reported higher satisfaction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Integrating ideological and political education elements into the advanced nursing practice course can enhance students' academic performance, learning efficiency, critical thinking ability, and course satisfaction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore the effectiveness of integrating ideological and political education elements into advanced nursing practice courses for nursing master's students.

Methods

This is a nonequivalent posttest design study. The study selected 24 nursing Master's students who took the advanced nursing practice course between 2023 and 2024 as the experimental group, and nursing Master's students who completed the advanced nursing practice course between 2021 and 2022 as the control group. The experimental group (25 students) received classroom instruction integrated with ideological and political elements, while the control group received traditional classroom teaching. The study compares the academic performance, learning stress and fatigue, critical thinking ability and satisfaction of the two groups.

Results

The experimental group's academic performance (84.71 ± 2.76) was significantly higher than that of the control group (75.44 ± 3.84), (p < 0.001). Compared to the control group, students in the experimental group received higher learning feedback and exhibited lower levels of excessive engagement, although there was no significant difference in overall effort between the two groups (p = 0.61). The experimental group's critical thinking ability (151.83 ± 4.48) was significantly higher than that of the control group (128.88 ± 5.24), (p < 0.01). Students in the experimental group also reported higher satisfaction.

Conclusion

Integrating ideological and political education elements into the advanced nursing practice course can enhance students' academic performance, learning efficiency, critical thinking ability, and course satisfaction.

查看原文本刊更多论文

将思想政治教育元素融入高级护理实习课程

目的探讨在护理硕士研究生高级护理实践课程中融入思想政治教育内容的效果。方法采用非等效后测设计研究。本研究选取2023年至2024年修读高级护理实践课程的护理硕士研究生24名作为实验组，2021年至2022年修读高级护理实践课程的护理硕士研究生24名作为对照组。实验组（25名学生）接受融合思想政治元素的课堂教学，对照组接受传统课堂教学。本研究比较了两组学生的学习成绩、学习压力和疲劳、批判性思维能力和满意度。结果实验组学习成绩（84.71±2.76）显著高于对照组（75.44±3.84），差异有统计学意义（p < 0.001）。与对照组相比，实验组学生获得了更高的学习反馈，表现出更低的过度投入水平，尽管两组之间的总体努力没有显著差异（p = 0.61）。实验组的批判性思维能力（151.83±4.48）显著高于对照组（128.88±5.24），差异有统计学意义（p < 0.01）。实验组学生的满意度也更高。结论在高级护理实习课程中融入思想政治教育元素，可以提高学生的学习成绩、学习效率、批判性思维能力和课程满意度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 医学-卫生保健

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

4.20%

发文量

143

审稿时长

3-8 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.