{"title":"An exploratory study on the human component using a cultural model to define open research topics for secure socio-technical systems","authors":"Amanda Brockinton , Mattia Salnitri , Francesca Kooner-Evans , John McAlaney , Shelley Thompson","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social engineering attacks like phishing emails target the human component of the whole socio-technical system (STS) of an organisation. These human components are exploited by actors to gain access and breach the whole system with examples like ransomware, pretexting, and even physical presences such as tailgating. Exploratory interviews investigate human components in organisations from six professionals with cybersecurity, psychology, and/or cyberpsychology backgrounds. Each interview lasted 30–45 min and were conducted remotely. Due to the sensitive nature of the cybersecurity field, participants were given full anonymity, meaning that interviews are not quoted directly. Results of the thematic analysis (TA) created six themes from the dataset: the weakest link narrative; influences (external and internal); the knowing-doing gap (a disconnect between knowledge and action); technology is always changing/security is always changing (security can always be better); the professional-client relationship in security and; the integration of technology and human behaviour in security. Additionally, results suggested that a thematic analysis is a useful multidisciplinary approach to help understand directions of future research. This is because of its explanatory power in describing how human components can be better integrated into systems to create more robust security cultures in organisations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 103000"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25001903","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Social engineering attacks like phishing emails target the human component of the whole socio-technical system (STS) of an organisation. These human components are exploited by actors to gain access and breach the whole system with examples like ransomware, pretexting, and even physical presences such as tailgating. Exploratory interviews investigate human components in organisations from six professionals with cybersecurity, psychology, and/or cyberpsychology backgrounds. Each interview lasted 30–45 min and were conducted remotely. Due to the sensitive nature of the cybersecurity field, participants were given full anonymity, meaning that interviews are not quoted directly. Results of the thematic analysis (TA) created six themes from the dataset: the weakest link narrative; influences (external and internal); the knowing-doing gap (a disconnect between knowledge and action); technology is always changing/security is always changing (security can always be better); the professional-client relationship in security and; the integration of technology and human behaviour in security. Additionally, results suggested that a thematic analysis is a useful multidisciplinary approach to help understand directions of future research. This is because of its explanatory power in describing how human components can be better integrated into systems to create more robust security cultures in organisations.
期刊介绍:
Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.