Comparison of Initial Lactate Levels and Their Prognostic Utility in Obese and Nonobese Patients with Sepsis

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Manoj Arra MD, PhD, Sasha Mozelewski-Hill MD, Taylor Kaser MPH, Rachel Ancona PhD, Philip Asaro MD, Christopher Holthaus MD
{"title":"Comparison of Initial Lactate Levels and Their Prognostic Utility in Obese and Nonobese Patients with Sepsis","authors":"Manoj Arra MD, PhD,&nbsp;Sasha Mozelewski-Hill MD,&nbsp;Taylor Kaser MPH,&nbsp;Rachel Ancona PhD,&nbsp;Philip Asaro MD,&nbsp;Christopher Holthaus MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.05.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sepsis is a high morbidity and mortality disease that is highly prevalent in emergency departments (EDs). Lactate is often utilized as a biomarker for sepsis, though its performance among subgroups such as obese patients is not well characterized. Given existing data on differences in lactate metabolism at baseline between obese and nonobese patients, this may be clinically relevant in sepsis identification and prognostication.</div></div><div><h3>Study Objective</h3><div>We sought to compare differences in initial lactate measurements and lactate utility in predicting 30-day mortality between obese and nonobese body mass index (BMI) patients with vasopressor-dependent and non-vasopressor-dependent sepsis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort study of obese and nonobese patients presenting to an adult hospital ED with sepsis with organ dysfunction. Patients were separated into vasopressor-dependent or non-vasopressor-dependent groups. The primary outcomes were differences in initial lactate and utility of initial lactate in predicting 30-day all-cause mortality by employing receiver operator characteristic curves.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Obese patients had lower initial lactate (2.2 mmol/L) compared with nonobese patients (2.4 mmol/L) in the non-vasopressor-dependent cohort. Lactate performed poorly-to-moderately well as a biomarker for 30-day mortality between obese and nonobese patients with sepsis, with no differences between BMI groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Initial lactate levels are lower in obese patients compared with nonobese patients, but are unlikely to be clinically significant. We found no difference in lactate’s utility as a biomarker for prediction of 30-day all-cause mortality between obese and nonobese patients. Lactate overall maintains some utility as a predictor of sepsis mortality, though factors that contribute to lactate levels remain unclear.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"75 ","pages":"Pages 79-88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467925002264","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sepsis is a high morbidity and mortality disease that is highly prevalent in emergency departments (EDs). Lactate is often utilized as a biomarker for sepsis, though its performance among subgroups such as obese patients is not well characterized. Given existing data on differences in lactate metabolism at baseline between obese and nonobese patients, this may be clinically relevant in sepsis identification and prognostication.

Study Objective

We sought to compare differences in initial lactate measurements and lactate utility in predicting 30-day mortality between obese and nonobese body mass index (BMI) patients with vasopressor-dependent and non-vasopressor-dependent sepsis.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of obese and nonobese patients presenting to an adult hospital ED with sepsis with organ dysfunction. Patients were separated into vasopressor-dependent or non-vasopressor-dependent groups. The primary outcomes were differences in initial lactate and utility of initial lactate in predicting 30-day all-cause mortality by employing receiver operator characteristic curves.

Results

Obese patients had lower initial lactate (2.2 mmol/L) compared with nonobese patients (2.4 mmol/L) in the non-vasopressor-dependent cohort. Lactate performed poorly-to-moderately well as a biomarker for 30-day mortality between obese and nonobese patients with sepsis, with no differences between BMI groups.

Conclusion

Initial lactate levels are lower in obese patients compared with nonobese patients, but are unlikely to be clinically significant. We found no difference in lactate’s utility as a biomarker for prediction of 30-day all-cause mortality between obese and nonobese patients. Lactate overall maintains some utility as a predictor of sepsis mortality, though factors that contribute to lactate levels remain unclear.
肥胖与非肥胖脓毒症患者初始乳酸水平的比较及其对预后的影响
背景败血症是一种高发病率和死亡率的疾病,在急诊科(EDs)非常普遍。乳酸通常被用作脓毒症的生物标志物,尽管其在肥胖患者等亚组中的表现尚未得到很好的表征。鉴于肥胖和非肥胖患者基线时乳酸代谢差异的现有数据,这可能与脓毒症的识别和预后具有临床相关性。研究目的:我们试图比较肥胖和非肥胖体重指数(BMI)合并血管加压剂依赖性和非血管加压剂依赖性败血症患者的初始乳酸测量值和乳酸效用在预测30天死亡率方面的差异。方法:我们对在一家成人医院急诊科就诊的患有败血症并器官功能障碍的肥胖和非肥胖患者进行了回顾性队列研究。患者被分为血管加压剂依赖组和非血管加压剂依赖组。主要结局是初始乳酸水平的差异,以及初始乳酸水平在利用受试者操作者特征曲线预测30天全因死亡率方面的效用。结果在非血管加压剂依赖性队列中,肥胖患者的初始乳酸水平(2.2 mmol/L)低于非肥胖患者(2.4 mmol/L)。乳酸作为肥胖和非肥胖脓毒症患者30天死亡率的生物标志物表现不佳至中等,BMI组之间无差异。结论肥胖患者的初始乳酸水平低于非肥胖患者,但不太可能具有临床意义。我们发现,在肥胖和非肥胖患者之间,乳酸作为预测30天全因死亡率的生物标志物的效用没有差异。总体而言,乳酸水平作为脓毒症死亡率的预测指标仍有一定的效用,尽管影响乳酸水平的因素尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信