Natasha Stonebridge , Rachel C. Sumner , Sam Scott
{"title":"Considering biophilic tendencies when operationalising nature as medicine: a critical review","authors":"Natasha Stonebridge , Rachel C. Sumner , Sam Scott","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This critical review adds to the rapidly expanding field of nature-health research and specifically its advancement towards defining and operationalising a ‘dose’ of nature required to support mental health. There is a wealth of literature to draw upon across broad areas of research where evidence of the restorative benefits of a relationship with nature is provided in order to design nature-based health interventions. However, due to variations in approach, support for nature to be salutogenic is a challenge to conceptualise. Drawing on theory to help develop a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of how interactions with nature support and improve wellbeing, the present review collates, describes and appraises tools designed to make sense of human-nature connection. Tools were evaluated in their ability to provide context to understanding factors associated with wellbeing, alongside their utility and relevance to work in the associated field. Importantly, drawing on the Bioavailability Model, the present work provides recommendations for the use of nature connection tools in future research, along with other considerations for understanding and contextualising discrepancies in the potential benefit of nature on prescription and its conceptualisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 102678"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001616","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This critical review adds to the rapidly expanding field of nature-health research and specifically its advancement towards defining and operationalising a ‘dose’ of nature required to support mental health. There is a wealth of literature to draw upon across broad areas of research where evidence of the restorative benefits of a relationship with nature is provided in order to design nature-based health interventions. However, due to variations in approach, support for nature to be salutogenic is a challenge to conceptualise. Drawing on theory to help develop a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of how interactions with nature support and improve wellbeing, the present review collates, describes and appraises tools designed to make sense of human-nature connection. Tools were evaluated in their ability to provide context to understanding factors associated with wellbeing, alongside their utility and relevance to work in the associated field. Importantly, drawing on the Bioavailability Model, the present work provides recommendations for the use of nature connection tools in future research, along with other considerations for understanding and contextualising discrepancies in the potential benefit of nature on prescription and its conceptualisation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space