Considering biophilic tendencies when operationalising nature as medicine: a critical review

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Natasha Stonebridge , Rachel C. Sumner , Sam Scott
{"title":"Considering biophilic tendencies when operationalising nature as medicine: a critical review","authors":"Natasha Stonebridge ,&nbsp;Rachel C. Sumner ,&nbsp;Sam Scott","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This critical review adds to the rapidly expanding field of nature-health research and specifically its advancement towards defining and operationalising a ‘dose’ of nature required to support mental health. There is a wealth of literature to draw upon across broad areas of research where evidence of the restorative benefits of a relationship with nature is provided in order to design nature-based health interventions. However, due to variations in approach, support for nature to be salutogenic is a challenge to conceptualise. Drawing on theory to help develop a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of how interactions with nature support and improve wellbeing, the present review collates, describes and appraises tools designed to make sense of human-nature connection. Tools were evaluated in their ability to provide context to understanding factors associated with wellbeing, alongside their utility and relevance to work in the associated field. Importantly, drawing on the Bioavailability Model, the present work provides recommendations for the use of nature connection tools in future research, along with other considerations for understanding and contextualising discrepancies in the potential benefit of nature on prescription and its conceptualisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 102678"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001616","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This critical review adds to the rapidly expanding field of nature-health research and specifically its advancement towards defining and operationalising a ‘dose’ of nature required to support mental health. There is a wealth of literature to draw upon across broad areas of research where evidence of the restorative benefits of a relationship with nature is provided in order to design nature-based health interventions. However, due to variations in approach, support for nature to be salutogenic is a challenge to conceptualise. Drawing on theory to help develop a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of how interactions with nature support and improve wellbeing, the present review collates, describes and appraises tools designed to make sense of human-nature connection. Tools were evaluated in their ability to provide context to understanding factors associated with wellbeing, alongside their utility and relevance to work in the associated field. Importantly, drawing on the Bioavailability Model, the present work provides recommendations for the use of nature connection tools in future research, along with other considerations for understanding and contextualising discrepancies in the potential benefit of nature on prescription and its conceptualisation.
在将自然作为医学运作时考虑亲生物倾向:一项批判性审查
这一重要的综述增加了迅速扩大的自然健康研究领域,特别是在定义和实施支持心理健康所需的自然“剂量”方面取得的进展。在广泛的研究领域中,有大量文献可供借鉴,其中提供了与自然建立关系的恢复益处的证据,以便设计基于自然的健康干预措施。然而,由于方法的不同,支持自然是有益健康的是一个概念化的挑战。利用理论来帮助我们更深入、更全面地理解与自然的互动是如何支持和改善幸福感的,本综述整理、描述和评估了旨在理解人与自然联系的工具。评估工具的能力,以提供理解与健康相关因素的背景,以及它们的效用和与相关领域工作的相关性。重要的是,利用生物利用度模型,本研究为在未来的研究中使用自然连接工具提供了建议,以及其他考虑因素,以理解和背景化自然对处方及其概念化的潜在益处的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信