Matthew Aludino, Jasmine Stinson, Mark Bounthavong, Jennifer Namba, Trina Huynh, Andrew Willeford
{"title":"Outcomes of a hybrid heart failure clinic model on optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy","authors":"Matthew Aludino, Jasmine Stinson, Mark Bounthavong, Jennifer Namba, Trina Huynh, Andrew Willeford","doi":"10.1016/j.japhpi.2025.100056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Achieving rapid titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure may be challenging due to limited clinical resources.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a hybrid clinic model led by pharmacists in optimizing GDMT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-center, retrospective analysis compared patients with an ejection fraction < 50% seen in a hybrid clinic model that included multidisciplinary in-person visits and pharmacist-led telehealth appointments (hybrid) to an in-person model that included only a cardiology provider (historical). The primary end point was the number of GDMT medications prescribed per patient. An exploratory end point included a modified optimal medical therapy score (mOMT). Outcomes were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model adjusting for baseline characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients in the hybrid cohort (n = 52) increased from 2.5 to 3.1 GDMT at 3 months compared to 2.5 to 2.8 in the historical cohort (n = 46). There was a significantly greater increase in the average number of GDMT at each time interval in the hybrid cohort compared to the historical cohort (difference in changes per interval = +0.13; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.21). More patients were on quadruple therapy at the last study visit (48.1% vs 26.1%, <em>P</em> = 0.025), and the increase in mOMT was significantly higher in the hybrid cohort (difference in changes = +0.036; 95% CI: 0.015, 0.056).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The hybrid model involving pharmacists was associated with greater initiation of GDMT compared to in-person care without a pharmacist. This study confirms the valuable role of pharmacists in optimizing therapy for patients with heart failure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100737,"journal":{"name":"JAPhA Practice Innovations","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100056"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAPhA Practice Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949969025000314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Achieving rapid titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure may be challenging due to limited clinical resources.
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a hybrid clinic model led by pharmacists in optimizing GDMT.
Methods
A single-center, retrospective analysis compared patients with an ejection fraction < 50% seen in a hybrid clinic model that included multidisciplinary in-person visits and pharmacist-led telehealth appointments (hybrid) to an in-person model that included only a cardiology provider (historical). The primary end point was the number of GDMT medications prescribed per patient. An exploratory end point included a modified optimal medical therapy score (mOMT). Outcomes were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model adjusting for baseline characteristics.
Results
Patients in the hybrid cohort (n = 52) increased from 2.5 to 3.1 GDMT at 3 months compared to 2.5 to 2.8 in the historical cohort (n = 46). There was a significantly greater increase in the average number of GDMT at each time interval in the hybrid cohort compared to the historical cohort (difference in changes per interval = +0.13; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.21). More patients were on quadruple therapy at the last study visit (48.1% vs 26.1%, P = 0.025), and the increase in mOMT was significantly higher in the hybrid cohort (difference in changes = +0.036; 95% CI: 0.015, 0.056).
Conclusions
The hybrid model involving pharmacists was associated with greater initiation of GDMT compared to in-person care without a pharmacist. This study confirms the valuable role of pharmacists in optimizing therapy for patients with heart failure.