‘What is love?’: Exploring the feeling rules and emotion work of Chinese users in human-AI romance

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Kenton Cheng Tak Chan , Xiaoyuan Li , Yue Liu , Bolin Chen , Zhiyu Han
{"title":"‘What is love?’: Exploring the feeling rules and emotion work of Chinese users in human-AI romance","authors":"Kenton Cheng Tak Chan ,&nbsp;Xiaoyuan Li ,&nbsp;Yue Liu ,&nbsp;Bolin Chen ,&nbsp;Zhiyu Han","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human-AI romantic relationships raise critical questions about attachment, cultural norms, and emotional vulnerability, particularly within non-Western contexts where their sociocultural underpinnings remain underexplored. This study investigates the emotional dynamics of human-AI romance in China through the lens of Hochschild’s (1983) feeling rules and emotion work. Using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), we examined user-generated content from Chinese human-AI romance communities on social media platforms and conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 users who experienced forming and dissolving relationships with AI companions. The findings identify four key phases of human-AI romance: 1) configuring expectations and seeking emotional fit, where users acted as autonomous ‘players’; 2) navigating the boundaries of passion and control, where users engaged in algorithmic co-construction for deeper intimacy; 3) disengaging from algorithmic fantasy due to personal choices or AI withdrawal, where users experienced emotional bereavement; and 4) post-relationship critical reflections, where users re-examined cultural feeling rules of love, seeking support online or re-engaging real-world intimacy. While users increasingly adapted existing feeling rules prescribed by cultural norms to align with the neoliberal consumption of affect overriding traditional values, their continuing emotion work pointed to broader cultural negotiations and identity development. The potential risks of emotional dependence and cognitive bias are discussed. This research contributes to understanding technology-mediated intimacy in non-Western settings and provides a foundation for future cross-cultural investigations into the evolving emotional landscape of human-AI relationships.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 102241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014717672500104X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human-AI romantic relationships raise critical questions about attachment, cultural norms, and emotional vulnerability, particularly within non-Western contexts where their sociocultural underpinnings remain underexplored. This study investigates the emotional dynamics of human-AI romance in China through the lens of Hochschild’s (1983) feeling rules and emotion work. Using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), we examined user-generated content from Chinese human-AI romance communities on social media platforms and conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 users who experienced forming and dissolving relationships with AI companions. The findings identify four key phases of human-AI romance: 1) configuring expectations and seeking emotional fit, where users acted as autonomous ‘players’; 2) navigating the boundaries of passion and control, where users engaged in algorithmic co-construction for deeper intimacy; 3) disengaging from algorithmic fantasy due to personal choices or AI withdrawal, where users experienced emotional bereavement; and 4) post-relationship critical reflections, where users re-examined cultural feeling rules of love, seeking support online or re-engaging real-world intimacy. While users increasingly adapted existing feeling rules prescribed by cultural norms to align with the neoliberal consumption of affect overriding traditional values, their continuing emotion work pointed to broader cultural negotiations and identity development. The potential risks of emotional dependence and cognitive bias are discussed. This research contributes to understanding technology-mediated intimacy in non-Western settings and provides a foundation for future cross-cultural investigations into the evolving emotional landscape of human-AI relationships.
“什么是爱?”:探索中国用户在人与人工智能爱情中的感受规律和情感工作
人类与人工智能的浪漫关系引发了关于依恋、文化规范和情感脆弱性的关键问题,特别是在非西方背景下,它们的社会文化基础仍未得到充分探索。本研究通过Hochschild(1983)的情感规则和情感工作来研究中国人类与人工智能浪漫的情感动态。利用解释现象学分析(IPA),我们研究了社交媒体平台上中国人类与人工智能浪漫社区的用户生成内容,并对10名经历过与人工智能伴侣建立和解除关系的用户进行了半结构化访谈。研究结果确定了人类与人工智能浪漫的四个关键阶段:1)设定期望并寻求情感契合,在这个阶段,用户扮演自主的“玩家”;2)驾驭激情和控制的边界,用户参与算法共建,获得更深层次的亲密关系;3)由于个人选择或AI退出而脱离算法幻想,用户经历情感丧亲;4)恋爱后的批判性反思,用户重新审视爱情的文化感受规则,在网上寻求支持或重新参与现实世界的亲密关系。虽然用户越来越多地适应由文化规范规定的现有情感规则,以与凌驾于传统价值观的情感的新自由主义消费保持一致,但他们持续的情感工作指向更广泛的文化谈判和身份发展。讨论了情绪依赖和认知偏差的潜在风险。这项研究有助于理解非西方环境中技术介导的亲密关系,并为未来对人类与人工智能关系不断演变的情感景观进行跨文化研究奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信