Exploring machine learning techniques for open stope stability prediction: A comparative study and feature importance analysis

Alicja Szmigiel , Derek B. Apel , Yashar Pourrahimian , Hassan Dehghanpour , Yuanyuan Pu
{"title":"Exploring machine learning techniques for open stope stability prediction: A comparative study and feature importance analysis","authors":"Alicja Szmigiel ,&nbsp;Derek B. Apel ,&nbsp;Yashar Pourrahimian ,&nbsp;Hassan Dehghanpour ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Pu","doi":"10.1016/j.rockmb.2024.100146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The stability of underground excavations is essential for ensuring the safety of mining operations. Classical stability assessment methods, established in empirical formulas and rock mass classification systems, have long been employed for evaluating stope stability in underground mining. Stability graphs, a popular empirical approach, utilize factors like rock stress, joint orientation, and surface orientation to calculate stability numbers critical for stope design. However, modern advancements in machine learning present new opportunities for enhancing predictive capabilities and understanding complex relationships influencing stope stability. Building upon research demonstrating the feasibility of using machine learning for stability prediction, our study investigates and compares several machine learning algorithms. By analyzing a dataset comprising stope dimensions and geomechanical properties, we explore the potential of machine learning models such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, AdaBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Artificial Neural Network in predicting stope stability. Evaluation metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score are employed to assess model performance, with the Artificial Neural Network emerging as the most effective. Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis enhances interpretability by explaining the contribution of individual features to model predictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101137,"journal":{"name":"Rock Mechanics Bulletin","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rock Mechanics Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773230424000453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The stability of underground excavations is essential for ensuring the safety of mining operations. Classical stability assessment methods, established in empirical formulas and rock mass classification systems, have long been employed for evaluating stope stability in underground mining. Stability graphs, a popular empirical approach, utilize factors like rock stress, joint orientation, and surface orientation to calculate stability numbers critical for stope design. However, modern advancements in machine learning present new opportunities for enhancing predictive capabilities and understanding complex relationships influencing stope stability. Building upon research demonstrating the feasibility of using machine learning for stability prediction, our study investigates and compares several machine learning algorithms. By analyzing a dataset comprising stope dimensions and geomechanical properties, we explore the potential of machine learning models such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, AdaBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Artificial Neural Network in predicting stope stability. Evaluation metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score are employed to assess model performance, with the Artificial Neural Network emerging as the most effective. Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis enhances interpretability by explaining the contribution of individual features to model predictions.
机器学习技术在空场稳定性预测中的应用:比较研究与特征重要性分析
地下掘进的稳定性是保证矿山安全生产的关键。长期以来,在经验公式和岩体分类体系中建立的经典稳定性评价方法一直被用于地下开采采场稳定性评价。稳定性图是一种流行的经验方法,它利用岩石应力、节理方向和地表方向等因素来计算对采场设计至关重要的稳定性数字。然而,现代机器学习的进步为提高预测能力和理解影响采场稳定性的复杂关系提供了新的机会。基于证明使用机器学习进行稳定性预测的可行性的研究,我们的研究调查并比较了几种机器学习算法。通过分析包含采场尺寸和地质力学特性的数据集,我们探索了随机森林、支持向量机、AdaBoost、XGBoost、LightGBM和人工神经网络等机器学习模型在预测采场稳定性方面的潜力。评估指标包括准确性、精密度、召回率和F1分数来评估模型的性能,其中人工神经网络是最有效的。此外,SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析通过解释个体特征对模型预测的贡献来提高可解释性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信