Perspectives on medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) access and service delivery among a community sample of people who use opioids in Los Angeles

IF 1.9 0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Maria Bolshakova , Kelsey A. Simpson , Siddhi S. Ganesh , Steven Sussman , Ricky N. Bluthenthal
{"title":"Perspectives on medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) access and service delivery among a community sample of people who use opioids in Los Angeles","authors":"Maria Bolshakova ,&nbsp;Kelsey A. Simpson ,&nbsp;Siddhi S. Ganesh ,&nbsp;Steven Sussman ,&nbsp;Ricky N. Bluthenthal","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) such as buprenorphine and methadone are effective in reducing overdoses, drug use, and drug-related harms. Despite the benefits, MOUD is under-utilized among people who use opioids (PWUO) and this access and service delivery gap is more pronounced among community recruited PWUO who experience greater barriers to treatment entry. Limited qualitative studies have explored MOUD service and delivery barriers among this population. To address this gap, our study investigates the MOUD experiences, preferences, perceived benefits, and unmet treatment needs of a community sample of PWUO in Los Angeles.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between September 2021–April 2022, qualitative interviews were conducted with PWUO in Los Angeles, California (N = 22) recruited from two community sites. Participants were at least 18 years old and self-reported opioid and injection drug use in the last 30 days. Participants answered questions related to general experiences with MOUD. We followed a thematic analysis approach to identify common themes that emerged from qualitative interview data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nearly a third of the sample was male (64 %), Hispanic/Latino (64 %), and the majority (73 %) reported an income of less than $1400 in the prior month. Participants reported: 1) hesitance initiating methadone treatment due to stigma 2) initiating MOUD to manage withdrawal and meet self-determined goals 3) comparing buprenorphine and methadone for withdrawal management to determine future treatment plans 4) being able to reduce interactions with the risk environment due to MOUD treatment and 5) recommending expanded MOUD access and improving delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings support expanded and low to no barrier access and delivery of MOUD for socially disadvantaged PWUO who receive treatment in community settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 209742"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925001213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) such as buprenorphine and methadone are effective in reducing overdoses, drug use, and drug-related harms. Despite the benefits, MOUD is under-utilized among people who use opioids (PWUO) and this access and service delivery gap is more pronounced among community recruited PWUO who experience greater barriers to treatment entry. Limited qualitative studies have explored MOUD service and delivery barriers among this population. To address this gap, our study investigates the MOUD experiences, preferences, perceived benefits, and unmet treatment needs of a community sample of PWUO in Los Angeles.

Methods

Between September 2021–April 2022, qualitative interviews were conducted with PWUO in Los Angeles, California (N = 22) recruited from two community sites. Participants were at least 18 years old and self-reported opioid and injection drug use in the last 30 days. Participants answered questions related to general experiences with MOUD. We followed a thematic analysis approach to identify common themes that emerged from qualitative interview data.

Results

Nearly a third of the sample was male (64 %), Hispanic/Latino (64 %), and the majority (73 %) reported an income of less than $1400 in the prior month. Participants reported: 1) hesitance initiating methadone treatment due to stigma 2) initiating MOUD to manage withdrawal and meet self-determined goals 3) comparing buprenorphine and methadone for withdrawal management to determine future treatment plans 4) being able to reduce interactions with the risk environment due to MOUD treatment and 5) recommending expanded MOUD access and improving delivery.

Conclusions

Our findings support expanded and low to no barrier access and delivery of MOUD for socially disadvantaged PWUO who receive treatment in community settings.
在洛杉矶使用阿片类药物的社区样本中,阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)药物获取和服务提供的观点
简介:治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)的药物,如丁丙诺啡和美沙酮,在减少过量用药、药物使用和药物相关危害方面是有效的。尽管有这些好处,但mod在阿片类药物使用者(PWUO)中未得到充分利用,这种可及性和服务提供差距在社区招募的PWUO中更为明显,他们在进入治疗方面面临更大的障碍。有限的定性研究探讨了这一人群中的mod服务和交付障碍。为了解决这一差距,我们的研究调查了洛杉矶PWUO社区样本的mod体验,偏好,感知收益和未满足的治疗需求。方法:在2021年9月至2022年4月期间,对加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的PWUO进行定性访谈(N = 22),从两个社区站点招募。参与者年龄至少为18 岁,并在过去30 天内自我报告使用阿片类药物和注射药物。参与者回答了与mod的一般体验相关的问题。我们采用主题分析方法来确定从定性访谈数据中出现的共同主题。结果:近三分之一的样本是男性(64% %),西班牙裔/拉丁裔(64% %),大多数(73% %)报告上个月的收入低于1400美元。参与者报告了:1)由于耻耻感而开始美沙酮治疗的犹豫;2)开始使用mod来管理戒断并实现自我确定的目标;3)比较丁丙诺啡和美沙酮用于戒断管理以确定未来的治疗计划;4)能够减少由于mod治疗与风险环境的相互作用;5)建议扩大mod的获取和改善交付。结论:我们的研究结果支持在社区环境中接受治疗的社会弱势PWUO扩大和低至无障碍获取和提供mod。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信