Clinical outcomes from nonoperative management of pediatric metacarpal and phalangeal fractures: A scoping review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Alice Pratt, Danielle Hitch
{"title":"Clinical outcomes from nonoperative management of pediatric metacarpal and phalangeal fractures: A scoping review.","authors":"Alice Pratt, Danielle Hitch","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2025.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric hand fractures are often managed nonoperatively, however literature comparing the outcomes of various nonoperative approaches is scarce. Nonoperative management approaches such as plaster cast immobilization and thermoplastic orthoses, are typically chosen when surgery is not indicated or necessary. Comparing the effectiveness of nonoperative management practices is crucial for enhancing pediatric hand therapy.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objectives of this review were to: (1) consolidate and evaluate research on nonoperative management of pediatric hand fracture management; (2) identify trends, gaps, and opportunities within this body of research; and (3) highlight areas for future research and the development of clinical guidelines.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Scoping review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive database search was conducted via AMED, CINAHL, Global Health, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE Complete, MEDLINE, and Open Dissertations. Included studies recruited children and adolescents aged 0 to 18years receiving nonoperative management for metacarpal and phalanx fractures. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively, focusing on key characteristics and emerging themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only three peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria, highlighting a significant lack of high-quality research. Clear clinical guidelines were not reported, and the included studies varied in their methodology, sample size and outcome measures. All studies emphasized the need for more rigorous and comparative research to establish effective management strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review highlights the critical need for comprehensive, comparative studies in pediatric hand fracture management. The evidence base is limited and fragmented, underscoring the necessity for rigorous clinical guidelines and the development of multicenter trials to optimize care for pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2025.05.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric hand fractures are often managed nonoperatively, however literature comparing the outcomes of various nonoperative approaches is scarce. Nonoperative management approaches such as plaster cast immobilization and thermoplastic orthoses, are typically chosen when surgery is not indicated or necessary. Comparing the effectiveness of nonoperative management practices is crucial for enhancing pediatric hand therapy.

Purpose: The objectives of this review were to: (1) consolidate and evaluate research on nonoperative management of pediatric hand fracture management; (2) identify trends, gaps, and opportunities within this body of research; and (3) highlight areas for future research and the development of clinical guidelines.

Study design: Scoping review.

Methods: An extensive database search was conducted via AMED, CINAHL, Global Health, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE Complete, MEDLINE, and Open Dissertations. Included studies recruited children and adolescents aged 0 to 18years receiving nonoperative management for metacarpal and phalanx fractures. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively, focusing on key characteristics and emerging themes.

Results: Only three peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria, highlighting a significant lack of high-quality research. Clear clinical guidelines were not reported, and the included studies varied in their methodology, sample size and outcome measures. All studies emphasized the need for more rigorous and comparative research to establish effective management strategies.

Conclusions: This scoping review highlights the critical need for comprehensive, comparative studies in pediatric hand fracture management. The evidence base is limited and fragmented, underscoring the necessity for rigorous clinical guidelines and the development of multicenter trials to optimize care for pediatric patients.

儿童掌骨和指骨骨折非手术治疗的临床结果:一项范围综述。
背景:小儿手部骨折通常采用非手术治疗,但是比较各种非手术方法治疗效果的文献很少。非手术治疗方法,如石膏固定和热塑性矫形器,通常在不需要手术或不需要手术时选择。比较非手术治疗方法的有效性对加强小儿手部治疗至关重要。目的:本综述的目的是:(1)巩固和评价儿童手部骨折非手术治疗的研究;(2)确定本研究领域的趋势、差距和机会;(3)强调未来的研究领域和临床指南的制定。研究设计:范围审查。方法:通过AMED、CINAHL、Global Health、Health来源:护理/学术版、MEDLINE Complete、MEDLINE和Open Dissertations进行广泛的数据库检索。纳入的研究招募了0 - 18岁接受掌骨和指骨骨折非手术治疗的儿童和青少年。数据提取和综合叙事,重点关注关键特征和新兴主题。结果:只有三个同行评议的研究符合纳入标准,突出了高质量研究的严重缺乏。没有明确的临床指南报告,纳入的研究在方法、样本量和结果测量方面各不相同。所有研究都强调需要进行更严格和比较的研究,以制定有效的管理战略。结论:本综述强调了对小儿手部骨折处理进行全面、比较研究的迫切需要。证据基础有限且支离破碎,强调了制定严格的临床指南和开展多中心试验以优化儿科患者护理的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信