A randomized comparative trial: Relative motion vs metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthoses for trigger finger management.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Li Xian Leong, Siaw Chui Chai, Julianne W Howell, Hanif Farhan Mohd Rasdi, Nur Rahimawati Abdul Rahman
{"title":"A randomized comparative trial: Relative motion vs metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthoses for trigger finger management.","authors":"Li Xian Leong, Siaw Chui Chai, Julianne W Howell, Hanif Farhan Mohd Rasdi, Nur Rahimawati Abdul Rahman","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2025.05.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthoses are used for managing trigger finger, with limited intervention evidence for relative motion orthoses.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This 6-week trial evaluated the effectiveness of metacarpophalangeal joint blocking and relative motion orthoses for managing trigger finger severity, function, occupational performance/satisfaction, and orthosis wearability.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized comparative trial, ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05763017).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six participants with no prior trigger finger intervention and ≥ 21 years old were randomly assigned to the relative motion or metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis (neutral metacarpophalangeal joint) groups. The primary author screened for eligibility and fabricated the orthoses. Week-1 and week-6 Therapist A assessed stages of stenosing tenosynovitis, number of triggering events in 10 active fists (NTE), visual analog scales for pain, orthosis comfort and satisfaction (wearability), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Week-3 Therapist B administered orthosis wearability visual analog scales. The relative motion pencil test determined orthosis design, relative motion extension or flexion, and metacarpophalangeal joint differential. Mixed-effects ANOVA was used to compare week-1 and week-6 outcomes. Cohen's f was used to measure the effect size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five participants completed this trial. Between week-1 and week-6, both groups demonstrated significant differences with large effect size in stages of stenosing tenosynovitis (f=1.21), NTE (f=1.07), pain at rest (f=0.36), pain during activity (f=0.76), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (f=1.19), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure performance (f=1.12) and satisfaction (f=1.14). No superior effect was noted between orthosis groups. Wearability for both groups was 7/10 at rest and 4/10 during activity. The pencil test yielded 15/18 relative motion extension orthoses and 20-25˚ metacarpophalangeal differential.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Symptom severity, pain, hand function, and orthosis wearability outcomes support interchangeable use of relative motion and metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthoses for managing trigger finger.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2025.05.018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthoses are used for managing trigger finger, with limited intervention evidence for relative motion orthoses.

Purpose: This 6-week trial evaluated the effectiveness of metacarpophalangeal joint blocking and relative motion orthoses for managing trigger finger severity, function, occupational performance/satisfaction, and orthosis wearability.

Study design: Randomized comparative trial, ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05763017).

Methods: Thirty-six participants with no prior trigger finger intervention and ≥ 21 years old were randomly assigned to the relative motion or metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis (neutral metacarpophalangeal joint) groups. The primary author screened for eligibility and fabricated the orthoses. Week-1 and week-6 Therapist A assessed stages of stenosing tenosynovitis, number of triggering events in 10 active fists (NTE), visual analog scales for pain, orthosis comfort and satisfaction (wearability), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Week-3 Therapist B administered orthosis wearability visual analog scales. The relative motion pencil test determined orthosis design, relative motion extension or flexion, and metacarpophalangeal joint differential. Mixed-effects ANOVA was used to compare week-1 and week-6 outcomes. Cohen's f was used to measure the effect size.

Results: Thirty-five participants completed this trial. Between week-1 and week-6, both groups demonstrated significant differences with large effect size in stages of stenosing tenosynovitis (f=1.21), NTE (f=1.07), pain at rest (f=0.36), pain during activity (f=0.76), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (f=1.19), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure performance (f=1.12) and satisfaction (f=1.14). No superior effect was noted between orthosis groups. Wearability for both groups was 7/10 at rest and 4/10 during activity. The pencil test yielded 15/18 relative motion extension orthoses and 20-25˚ metacarpophalangeal differential.

Conclusions: Symptom severity, pain, hand function, and orthosis wearability outcomes support interchangeable use of relative motion and metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthoses for managing trigger finger.

一项随机比较试验:相对运动与掌指关节阻塞矫形器用于扳机指管理。
背景:掌指关节阻断矫形器用于治疗扳机指,相对运动矫形器的干预证据有限。目的:这项为期6周的试验评估了掌指关节阻断和相对运动矫形器在控制扳机指严重程度、功能、职业表现/满意度和矫形器耐磨性方面的有效性。研究设计:随机对照试验,ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05763017)。方法:36例年龄≥21岁、无触发指干预的患者随机分为相对运动组或掌指关节阻塞矫形器组(中立掌指关节)。主要作者筛选合格并制作矫形器。第1周和第6周,治疗师A评估了狭窄性腱膜炎的分期、10个活动拳头(NTE)中触发事件的数量、疼痛的视觉模拟量表、矫形器的舒适度和满意度(可穿戴性)、手臂、肩膀和手的残疾以及加拿大职业表现量表。第三周治疗师B给予矫形器可穿戴性视觉模拟量表。相对运动铅笔试验确定矫形器设计、相对运动伸展或屈曲以及掌指关节差。采用混合效应方差分析比较第1周和第6周的结果。Cohen's f用于测量效应大小。结果:35名受试者完成了本试验。在第1周和第6周之间,两组在狭窄性腱鞘炎(f=1.21)、NTE (f=1.07)、休息时疼痛(f=0.36)、活动时疼痛(f=0.76)、手臂、肩膀和手的残疾(f=1.19)、加拿大职业表现测量(f=1.12)和满意度(f=1.14)的阶段均表现出显著差异,且效应量很大。矫形器组之间没有明显的效果。两组的耐磨性在休息时为7/10,在活动时为4/10。铅笔试验获得15/18相对运动扩展矫形器和20-25˚掌指关节差。结论:症状严重程度、疼痛、手部功能和矫形器可穿戴性结果支持相对运动矫形器和掌指关节阻塞矫形器可互换使用,用于管理扳机指。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信