Effect of cerebellar stimulation on awareness recovery in disorders of consciousness (CARE-DoC): A randomized, sham-controlled, crossover clinical trial

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rong Chen , Qiong Gao , Dian-Wei Wu , Jianmin Hao , Jing-Jing Zhao , Xuan Wang , Ji-Heng He , Fang Yuan , Xiao-Gang Kang , Ling Wang , Hai-Bo Di , Chang-Geng Song , Wen Jiang
{"title":"Effect of cerebellar stimulation on awareness recovery in disorders of consciousness (CARE-DoC): A randomized, sham-controlled, crossover clinical trial","authors":"Rong Chen ,&nbsp;Qiong Gao ,&nbsp;Dian-Wei Wu ,&nbsp;Jianmin Hao ,&nbsp;Jing-Jing Zhao ,&nbsp;Xuan Wang ,&nbsp;Ji-Heng He ,&nbsp;Fang Yuan ,&nbsp;Xiao-Gang Kang ,&nbsp;Ling Wang ,&nbsp;Hai-Bo Di ,&nbsp;Chang-Geng Song ,&nbsp;Wen Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Disorders of consciousness (DoC) are major clinical challenges. We aimed to evaluate the effects of cerebellar intermittent theta-burst stimulation (CRB-iTBS) in the treatment of DoC. We conducted a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, cross-over clinical trial. Patients with vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or minimally conscious state within 15 days to 1 year after brain injuries were recruited. The bilateral cerebellum was targeted by iTBS for 5 consecutive days under neuronavigation. The primary outcome was the change in Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) total scores after five sessions. Secondary outcomes included changes in CRS-R scores after the first session, the changes in CRS-R subscales and the alterations in “ABCD” EEG patterns after the first and fifth sessions. Follow-up outcomes included six-month functional outcomes and consciousness recovery. We included 44 patients in the intention-to-treat analysis. No significant difference was observed in the change of CRS-R total scores between active and sham groups after five sessions (difference ​= ​0.428, 95 ​% CI ​= ​−0.202 - 1.057, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.180). However, active stimulation induced greater CRS-R improvements after the first session (difference ​= ​1.048, 95 ​% CI ​= ​0.480–1.615, <em>P</em> ​&lt; ​0.001), especially in auditory, visual, oromotor/verbal, and arousal subscales. Active stimulation increased the prevalence of EEG patterns “C” and “D” after both the first and fifth sessions. Favorable six-month functional outcomes and consciousness recovery were associated with an elevation in “ABCD” EEG patterns during active treatment periods. These findings demonstrate that CRB-iTBS exhibits potential as a neuromodulation strategy to promote consciousness recovery in DoC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19159,"journal":{"name":"Neurotherapeutics","volume":"22 5","pages":"Article e00635"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878747925001138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disorders of consciousness (DoC) are major clinical challenges. We aimed to evaluate the effects of cerebellar intermittent theta-burst stimulation (CRB-iTBS) in the treatment of DoC. We conducted a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, cross-over clinical trial. Patients with vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or minimally conscious state within 15 days to 1 year after brain injuries were recruited. The bilateral cerebellum was targeted by iTBS for 5 consecutive days under neuronavigation. The primary outcome was the change in Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) total scores after five sessions. Secondary outcomes included changes in CRS-R scores after the first session, the changes in CRS-R subscales and the alterations in “ABCD” EEG patterns after the first and fifth sessions. Follow-up outcomes included six-month functional outcomes and consciousness recovery. We included 44 patients in the intention-to-treat analysis. No significant difference was observed in the change of CRS-R total scores between active and sham groups after five sessions (difference ​= ​0.428, 95 ​% CI ​= ​−0.202 - 1.057, P ​= ​0.180). However, active stimulation induced greater CRS-R improvements after the first session (difference ​= ​1.048, 95 ​% CI ​= ​0.480–1.615, P ​< ​0.001), especially in auditory, visual, oromotor/verbal, and arousal subscales. Active stimulation increased the prevalence of EEG patterns “C” and “D” after both the first and fifth sessions. Favorable six-month functional outcomes and consciousness recovery were associated with an elevation in “ABCD” EEG patterns during active treatment periods. These findings demonstrate that CRB-iTBS exhibits potential as a neuromodulation strategy to promote consciousness recovery in DoC.
小脑刺激对意识障碍患者意识恢复的影响(CARE-DoC):一项随机、假对照、交叉临床试验。
意识障碍(DoC)是临床面临的主要挑战。我们的目的是评估小脑间歇性爆发刺激(CRB-iTBS)治疗DoC的效果。我们进行了一项随机、假对照、双盲、交叉临床试验。招募脑损伤后15天至1年内出现植物人/无反应性清醒综合征或最低意识状态的患者。在神经导航下,iTBS连续5天靶向双侧小脑。主要结局是5个疗程后昏迷恢复量表修订(CRS-R)总分的变化。次要结果包括第一次治疗后CRS-R评分的变化,第一次和第五次治疗后CRS-R亚量表的变化以及“ABCD”脑电图模式的变化。随访结果包括六个月的功能结果和意识恢复。我们纳入了44例患者进行意向治疗分析。5个疗程后,活动组与假手术组的CRS-R总分变化无显著性差异(差异= 0.428,95% CI = -0.202 ~ 1.057, P = 0.180)。然而,主动刺激在第一阶段后诱导了更大的CRS-R改善(差异= 1.048,95% CI = 0.480-1.615, P < 0.001),特别是在听觉、视觉、运动/语言和唤醒亚量表上。在第一次和第五次治疗后,主动刺激增加了脑电图模式“C”和“D”的患病率。在积极治疗期间,良好的六个月功能结果和意识恢复与“ABCD”脑电图模式的升高有关。这些发现表明,CRB-iTBS作为一种神经调节策略具有促进DoC意识恢复的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurotherapeutics
Neurotherapeutics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.50%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurotherapeutics® is the journal of the American Society for Experimental Neurotherapeutics (ASENT). Each issue provides critical reviews of an important topic relating to the treatment of neurological disorders written by international authorities. The Journal also publishes original research articles in translational neuroscience including descriptions of cutting edge therapies that cross disciplinary lines and represent important contributions to neurotherapeutics for medical practitioners and other researchers in the field. Neurotherapeutics ® delivers a multidisciplinary perspective on the frontiers of translational neuroscience, provides perspectives on current research and practice, and covers social and ethical as well as scientific issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信