Evaluating Outcomes of Flexor Tendon Excision During Trigger Finger Release.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2025-07-05 DOI:10.1177/15589447251350167
Joydeep Baidya, Olivia A Opara, Nicholas B Pohl, Harrison Patrizio, Sebastian Fras, Abbey Glover, Pedro K Beredjiklian, Daniel J Fletcher
{"title":"Evaluating Outcomes of Flexor Tendon Excision During Trigger Finger Release.","authors":"Joydeep Baidya, Olivia A Opara, Nicholas B Pohl, Harrison Patrizio, Sebastian Fras, Abbey Glover, Pedro K Beredjiklian, Daniel J Fletcher","doi":"10.1177/15589447251350167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with trigger finger who are refractory to nonsurgical treatments require trigger finger release (TFR) using A1 pulley release, while those with persistent triggering or severe proximal interphalangeal joint contracture may necessitate additional flexor tendon excision (FTE). This study characterizes the frequency of FTE performed at the time of primary TFR and compares outcomes between isolated TFR and TFR with additional FTE for trigger finger management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 8551 patients who underwent TFR were retrospectively reviewed, among whom 218 (2.5%) required additional FTE. A 2:1 matched isolated TFR group was used for comparison. Patient demographics, complications, and outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 121 patients undergoing TFR with FTE were matched to 243 patients undergoing isolated TFR. The TFR with complete FTE group was youngest and predominantly male. The long finger was most commonly affected across all groups. Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet was the most frequently used type of anesthesia in isolated TFR procedures. While local anesthesia with sedation was more commonly used for TFR with FTE. The proportion of patients who received at least one preoperative steroid injection was highest in the isolated TFR group. All other demographic variables, complications, and patient-reported outcomes were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found high rates of postoperative improvement in TFR with FTE groups, as well as similar oral and steroid injections, complication rates, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores compared to the isolated TFR group. Therefore, TFR with FTE can be a safe and effective surgery with similar outcomes to isolated TFR and no additional risks in appropriately indicated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"15589447251350167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447251350167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with trigger finger who are refractory to nonsurgical treatments require trigger finger release (TFR) using A1 pulley release, while those with persistent triggering or severe proximal interphalangeal joint contracture may necessitate additional flexor tendon excision (FTE). This study characterizes the frequency of FTE performed at the time of primary TFR and compares outcomes between isolated TFR and TFR with additional FTE for trigger finger management.

Methods: A total of 8551 patients who underwent TFR were retrospectively reviewed, among whom 218 (2.5%) required additional FTE. A 2:1 matched isolated TFR group was used for comparison. Patient demographics, complications, and outcomes were compared.

Results: A total of 121 patients undergoing TFR with FTE were matched to 243 patients undergoing isolated TFR. The TFR with complete FTE group was youngest and predominantly male. The long finger was most commonly affected across all groups. Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet was the most frequently used type of anesthesia in isolated TFR procedures. While local anesthesia with sedation was more commonly used for TFR with FTE. The proportion of patients who received at least one preoperative steroid injection was highest in the isolated TFR group. All other demographic variables, complications, and patient-reported outcomes were comparable between groups.

Conclusions: This study found high rates of postoperative improvement in TFR with FTE groups, as well as similar oral and steroid injections, complication rates, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores compared to the isolated TFR group. Therefore, TFR with FTE can be a safe and effective surgery with similar outcomes to isolated TFR and no additional risks in appropriately indicated patients.

扳机指松解术中屈肌腱切除的疗效评价。
背景:对非手术治疗难治性触发指的患者需要使用A1滑轮松解触发指,而持续触发或严重近端指间关节挛缩的患者可能需要额外的屈肌腱切除术(FTE)。本研究描述了原发性TFR时进行FTE的频率,并比较了孤立TFR和在触发指治疗中进行额外FTE的TFR之间的结果。方法:回顾性分析8551例接受TFR的患者,其中218例(2.5%)需要额外的FTE。采用2:1匹配的分离TFR组进行比较。比较患者人口统计学、并发症和结果。结果:121例合并FTE的TFR患者与243例单独TFR患者相匹配。TFR伴完全FTE组年龄最小,以男性为主。在所有人群中,长手指最常受到影响。无止血带是孤立TFR手术中最常用的麻醉方式。而局部麻醉加镇静更常用于TFR合并FTE。术前接受至少一次类固醇注射的患者比例在孤立性TFR组中最高。所有其他人口统计学变量、并发症和患者报告的结果在两组之间具有可比性。结论:本研究发现,与孤立的TFR组相比,FTE组TFR术后改善率高,口服和类固醇注射相似,并发症发生率高,手臂、肩部和手部残疾评分也低。因此,TFR合并FTE可以是一种安全有效的手术,其结果与孤立TFR相似,并且在适当适应症患者中没有额外的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信