The experience of discrimination impacts technology readiness and psychosocial states of minoritized families living with type 1 diabetes: Findings from the BEAD-T1D Pilot study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ananta Addala, Ricardo Medina Peñaranda, Lauren E Figg, Sarah Hanes, Daniel Garfias Silva, Hector I Ortega, Diana Peña, Gary M Shaw, Lisa J Chamberlain, Diana Naranjo, Jennifer K Raymond, David M Maahs, Korey K Hood
{"title":"The experience of discrimination impacts technology readiness and psychosocial states of minoritized families living with type 1 diabetes: Findings from the BEAD-T1D Pilot study.","authors":"Ananta Addala, Ricardo Medina Peñaranda, Lauren E Figg, Sarah Hanes, Daniel Garfias Silva, Hector I Ortega, Diana Peña, Gary M Shaw, Lisa J Chamberlain, Diana Naranjo, Jennifer K Raymond, David M Maahs, Korey K Hood","doi":"10.1016/j.eprac.2025.06.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to understand the association of perceived discrimination with diabetes technology utilization and psychosocial states in minoritized families with public insurance and pediatric type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Building the Evidence to Address Disparities in Type 1 Diabetes Pilot (BEAD-Pilot) study engaged parents/guardians of children aged<12 years with type 1 diabetes and public insurance. Parents/guardians were invited to participate in surveys, focus groups, and/or advisory groups. Surveys included validated measures assessing perceived discrimination, psychosocial factors, and diabetes technology acceptance. Data were analyzed via descriptive statistics, group comparisons, and regressions. Through semi-structured interviews we explored barriers to diabetes technology use and data were coded inductively by a five-member bilingual group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Discrimination correlated with lower diabetes technology acceptance (r=-0.38, p=0.05). Higher perceived discrimination was significantly associated with increased depression (β=0.45, p<0.001) and decreased global health (β=-0.27, p=0.011). Qualitative data revealed that parents experienced discrimination based on race, ethnicity, and insurance status, often leading to mistrust and reluctance to engage in care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Perceived discrimination appears to be an underexplored but meaningful barrier to diabetes technology utilization. Addressing discrimination in healthcare and community settings, in addition to access, is essential for closing disparities in diabetes technology utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":11682,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eprac.2025.06.023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to understand the association of perceived discrimination with diabetes technology utilization and psychosocial states in minoritized families with public insurance and pediatric type 1 diabetes.

Methods: The Building the Evidence to Address Disparities in Type 1 Diabetes Pilot (BEAD-Pilot) study engaged parents/guardians of children aged<12 years with type 1 diabetes and public insurance. Parents/guardians were invited to participate in surveys, focus groups, and/or advisory groups. Surveys included validated measures assessing perceived discrimination, psychosocial factors, and diabetes technology acceptance. Data were analyzed via descriptive statistics, group comparisons, and regressions. Through semi-structured interviews we explored barriers to diabetes technology use and data were coded inductively by a five-member bilingual group.

Results: Discrimination correlated with lower diabetes technology acceptance (r=-0.38, p=0.05). Higher perceived discrimination was significantly associated with increased depression (β=0.45, p<0.001) and decreased global health (β=-0.27, p=0.011). Qualitative data revealed that parents experienced discrimination based on race, ethnicity, and insurance status, often leading to mistrust and reluctance to engage in care.

Conclusions: Perceived discrimination appears to be an underexplored but meaningful barrier to diabetes technology utilization. Addressing discrimination in healthcare and community settings, in addition to access, is essential for closing disparities in diabetes technology utilization.

歧视经历影响1型糖尿病少数民族家庭的技术准备和心理社会状态:来自BEAD-T1D试点研究的结果
目的:本研究旨在了解少数民族公共保险家庭和儿童1型糖尿病患者的感知歧视与糖尿病技术使用和心理社会状态的关系。方法:建立证据解决1型糖尿病差异试点(BEAD-Pilot)研究,涉及年龄儿童的父母/监护人。结果:歧视与较低的糖尿病技术接受度相关(r=-0.38, p=0.05)。较高的感知歧视与抑郁症的增加显著相关(β=0.45)。结论:感知歧视似乎是糖尿病技术使用的一个尚未充分探索但有意义的障碍。除获取外,解决保健和社区环境中的歧视问题对于缩小糖尿病技术利用方面的差距至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine Practice
Endocrine Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
546
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Endocrine Practice (ISSN: 1530-891X), a peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year, is the official journal of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE). The primary mission of Endocrine Practice is to enhance the health care of patients with endocrine diseases through continuing education of practicing endocrinologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信