Epistasis in Allosteric Proteins: Can Biophysical Models Provide a Better Framework for Prediction and Understanding?

IF 4.7 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
David Ross, Drew S Tack, Peter D Tonner, Olga B Vasilyeva
{"title":"Epistasis in Allosteric Proteins: Can Biophysical Models Provide a Better Framework for Prediction and Understanding?","authors":"David Ross, Drew S Tack, Peter D Tonner, Olga B Vasilyeva","doi":"10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prediction of epistasis, or the interaction between mutations, is a complex challenge impacting protein science, healthcare, and biotechnology. For allosteric proteins, the prediction of epistatic effects is further complicated by the intricate networks of conformational states and binding interactions inherent to their function. Here, we explore these issues by systematically comparing biophysical and phenomenological models to analyze mutational effects and epistasis for the lac repressor protein, LacI. Using an extensive dataset consisting of dose-response measurements for 164 LacI variants, we find that while the phenomenological Hill model provides slightly better predictive accuracy, the biophysical model fits the data more parsimoniously, with significantly less epistasis in its parameters. Our results highlight the importance of the multi-state, multi-dimensional nature of allosteric function and the potential benefits of using biophysical models for the analysis of mutational effects and epistasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Biology","volume":" ","pages":"169327"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prediction of epistasis, or the interaction between mutations, is a complex challenge impacting protein science, healthcare, and biotechnology. For allosteric proteins, the prediction of epistatic effects is further complicated by the intricate networks of conformational states and binding interactions inherent to their function. Here, we explore these issues by systematically comparing biophysical and phenomenological models to analyze mutational effects and epistasis for the lac repressor protein, LacI. Using an extensive dataset consisting of dose-response measurements for 164 LacI variants, we find that while the phenomenological Hill model provides slightly better predictive accuracy, the biophysical model fits the data more parsimoniously, with significantly less epistasis in its parameters. Our results highlight the importance of the multi-state, multi-dimensional nature of allosteric function and the potential benefits of using biophysical models for the analysis of mutational effects and epistasis.

变构蛋白的上位性:生物物理模型能为预测和理解提供更好的框架吗?
上位性的预测,或突变之间的相互作用,是一个复杂的挑战,影响蛋白质科学,医疗保健和生物技术。对于变构蛋白,由于其功能固有的构象状态和结合相互作用的复杂网络,对上位效应的预测变得更加复杂。在这里,我们通过系统地比较生物物理和现象学模型来探讨这些问题,以分析lac抑制蛋白LacI的突变效应和上位性。使用包含164个LacI变体的剂量响应测量的广泛数据集,我们发现,虽然现象学Hill模型提供了稍好的预测精度,但生物物理模型更简化地拟合数据,其参数的先验性显着降低。我们的研究结果强调了变构功能的多状态、多维性质的重要性,以及使用生物物理模型分析突变效应和作用的潜在好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Molecular Biology
Journal of Molecular Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
412
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Molecular Biology (JMB) provides high quality, comprehensive and broad coverage in all areas of molecular biology. The journal publishes original scientific research papers that provide mechanistic and functional insights and report a significant advance to the field. The journal encourages the submission of multidisciplinary studies that use complementary experimental and computational approaches to address challenging biological questions. Research areas include but are not limited to: Biomolecular interactions, signaling networks, systems biology; Cell cycle, cell growth, cell differentiation; Cell death, autophagy; Cell signaling and regulation; Chemical biology; Computational biology, in combination with experimental studies; DNA replication, repair, and recombination; Development, regenerative biology, mechanistic and functional studies of stem cells; Epigenetics, chromatin structure and function; Gene expression; Membrane processes, cell surface proteins and cell-cell interactions; Methodological advances, both experimental and theoretical, including databases; Microbiology, virology, and interactions with the host or environment; Microbiota mechanistic and functional studies; Nuclear organization; Post-translational modifications, proteomics; Processing and function of biologically important macromolecules and complexes; Molecular basis of disease; RNA processing, structure and functions of non-coding RNAs, transcription; Sorting, spatiotemporal organization, trafficking; Structural biology; Synthetic biology; Translation, protein folding, chaperones, protein degradation and quality control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信