Intra-arterial Tenecteplase for Acute Stroke After Successful Endovascular Therapy: The ANGEL-TNK Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Pub Date : 2025-07-05 DOI:10.1001/jama.2025.10800
Zhongrong Miao,Gang Luo,Ligang Song,Dapeng Sun,Wenhuo Chen,Xiaoxi Yao,Yuesong Pan,Yaou Liu,Guangxiong Yuan,Changming Wen,Ming Wei,Xueli Cai,Qingcheng Yang,Zhiming Zhou,Mingze Chang,Guangxian Nan,Jing Wang,Guangyu Xiang,Li Zhou,Wen Gao,Hong Zhang,Jiheng Hao,Chenghua Xu,Yaxuan Sun,Tingyu Yi,Ganghua Feng,Hongxing Han,Feng Gao,Ning Ma,Dapeng Mo,Xuan Sun,Yiming Deng,Xu Tong,Xiaoqing Li,Baixue Jia,Bo Wang,Zijun He,Ming Yang,Xingquan Zhao,Xuelei Zhang,Longhui Zhang,Shuo Li,Xin Tong,Jing Jing,Yunyun Xiong,Tao Liu,Zixiao Li,Zeguang Ren,Yilong Wang,David S Liebeskind,Tudor G Jovin,Thanh N Nguyen,Yongjun Wang,Liping Liu,Bernard Yan,Xiaochuan Huo,
{"title":"Intra-arterial Tenecteplase for Acute Stroke After Successful Endovascular Therapy: The ANGEL-TNK Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Zhongrong Miao,Gang Luo,Ligang Song,Dapeng Sun,Wenhuo Chen,Xiaoxi Yao,Yuesong Pan,Yaou Liu,Guangxiong Yuan,Changming Wen,Ming Wei,Xueli Cai,Qingcheng Yang,Zhiming Zhou,Mingze Chang,Guangxian Nan,Jing Wang,Guangyu Xiang,Li Zhou,Wen Gao,Hong Zhang,Jiheng Hao,Chenghua Xu,Yaxuan Sun,Tingyu Yi,Ganghua Feng,Hongxing Han,Feng Gao,Ning Ma,Dapeng Mo,Xuan Sun,Yiming Deng,Xu Tong,Xiaoqing Li,Baixue Jia,Bo Wang,Zijun He,Ming Yang,Xingquan Zhao,Xuelei Zhang,Longhui Zhang,Shuo Li,Xin Tong,Jing Jing,Yunyun Xiong,Tao Liu,Zixiao Li,Zeguang Ren,Yilong Wang,David S Liebeskind,Tudor G Jovin,Thanh N Nguyen,Yongjun Wang,Liping Liu,Bernard Yan,Xiaochuan Huo, ","doi":"10.1001/jama.2025.10800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\r\nThe role of intra-arterial tenecteplase for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke after successful endovascular therapy is uncertain.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo assess the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial tenecteplase in patients with successful endovascular therapy (defined as a score on the expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [eTICI] scale of 2b to 3) after endovascular therapy.\r\n\r\nDESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS\r\nThis was a prospective, open-label, blinded end point, randomized trial. Recruitment took place between February 16, 2023, and March 23, 2024, with final follow-up on July 4, 2024. The study was conducted across 19 centers in China. Patients with acute anterior circulation LVO treated between 4.5 and 24 hours from the time that the patient was last known to be well were included.\r\n\r\nINTERVENTION\r\nAfter successful endovascular recanalization, defined as eTICI 2b or greater, patients were randomized to receive intra-arterial tenecteplase at 0.125 mg/kg (n = 126) or standard medical treatment (n = 129).\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES\r\nThe primary end point was excellent outcome at 90 days, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 1 (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). There were a total of 7 secondary efficacy end points (mRS score of 0-1 at 90 days, mRS score at 90 days, mRS score of 0-2 at 90 days, mRS score of 0-3 at 90 days, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 0-1 or improved ≥10 points at 36 hours, European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale score at 90 days, time to maximum volume > 6 s at 24 hours, and infarct core volume change from baseline) and 3 safety end points, including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 48 hours, any intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours, and all-cause mortality within 90 days.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong 256 patients who were randomized (median [IQR] age, 71.6 [61.3-79.2] years; 113 [44.1%] females), 255 (99.6%) completed the trial. The rate of patients with an mRS score of 0 to 1 at 90 days was 40.5% in the intra-arterial tenecteplase group (n = 51) and 26.4% in the standard medical treatment group (n = 34) (relative risk, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.06-1.95]; P = .02). Of 7 prespecified secondary efficacy end points, none showed a significant difference. Intra-arterial tenecteplase after endovascular therapy did not increase the incidence of sICH within 48 hours after treatment compared with standard medical treatment (5.6% vs 6.2%; relative risk, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.36-2.53]; P = .92). Mortality at 90 days was 21.4% with intra-arterial tenecteplase and 21.7% with standard medical treatment (relative risk, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.40-1.43]; P = .78).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE\r\nIn patients with acute LVO presenting between 4.5 and 24 hours of symptom onset, intra-arterial tenecteplase after successful thrombectomy had a greater likelihood of excellent neurological outcome at 90 days without increasing the risk of sICH or mortality. However, because none of the secondary efficacy analyses supported the primary finding, further trials are needed to confirm the results.\r\n\r\nTrial Registration\r\nClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05624190.","PeriodicalId":518009,"journal":{"name":"JAMA","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.10800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IMPORTANCE The role of intra-arterial tenecteplase for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke after successful endovascular therapy is uncertain. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial tenecteplase in patients with successful endovascular therapy (defined as a score on the expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [eTICI] scale of 2b to 3) after endovascular therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a prospective, open-label, blinded end point, randomized trial. Recruitment took place between February 16, 2023, and March 23, 2024, with final follow-up on July 4, 2024. The study was conducted across 19 centers in China. Patients with acute anterior circulation LVO treated between 4.5 and 24 hours from the time that the patient was last known to be well were included. INTERVENTION After successful endovascular recanalization, defined as eTICI 2b or greater, patients were randomized to receive intra-arterial tenecteplase at 0.125 mg/kg (n = 126) or standard medical treatment (n = 129). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was excellent outcome at 90 days, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 1 (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). There were a total of 7 secondary efficacy end points (mRS score of 0-1 at 90 days, mRS score at 90 days, mRS score of 0-2 at 90 days, mRS score of 0-3 at 90 days, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 0-1 or improved ≥10 points at 36 hours, European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale score at 90 days, time to maximum volume > 6 s at 24 hours, and infarct core volume change from baseline) and 3 safety end points, including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 48 hours, any intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours, and all-cause mortality within 90 days. RESULTS Among 256 patients who were randomized (median [IQR] age, 71.6 [61.3-79.2] years; 113 [44.1%] females), 255 (99.6%) completed the trial. The rate of patients with an mRS score of 0 to 1 at 90 days was 40.5% in the intra-arterial tenecteplase group (n = 51) and 26.4% in the standard medical treatment group (n = 34) (relative risk, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.06-1.95]; P = .02). Of 7 prespecified secondary efficacy end points, none showed a significant difference. Intra-arterial tenecteplase after endovascular therapy did not increase the incidence of sICH within 48 hours after treatment compared with standard medical treatment (5.6% vs 6.2%; relative risk, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.36-2.53]; P = .92). Mortality at 90 days was 21.4% with intra-arterial tenecteplase and 21.7% with standard medical treatment (relative risk, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.40-1.43]; P = .78). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In patients with acute LVO presenting between 4.5 and 24 hours of symptom onset, intra-arterial tenecteplase after successful thrombectomy had a greater likelihood of excellent neurological outcome at 90 days without increasing the risk of sICH or mortality. However, because none of the secondary efficacy analyses supported the primary finding, further trials are needed to confirm the results. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05624190.
血管内治疗成功后急性脑卒中动脉内注射Tenecteplase: ANGEL-TNK随机临床试验
动脉内tenecteplase在血管内治疗成功后急性大血管闭塞(LVO)卒中中的作用尚不确定。目的评价血管内治疗成功的患者(定义为脑梗死扩大溶栓[eTICI]评分为2b至3分)动脉内应用tenecteplase的疗效和安全性。设计、环境和参与者:这是一项前瞻性、开放标签、盲法终点、随机试验。招聘在2023年2月16日至2024年3月23日之间进行,最后一次跟进是在2024年7月4日。这项研究在中国的19个中心进行。急性前循环LVO患者的治疗时间为患者最后一次确认健康后的4.5至24小时。干预:在血管内再通(定义为eTICI 2b或更高)成功后,患者随机接受动脉内注射剂量为0.125 mg/kg的tenecteplase (n = 126)或标准药物治疗(n = 129)。主要结局和测量主要终点为90天的优秀结局,定义为修改的兰金量表(mRS)评分0到1(范围0[无症状]到6[死亡])。总共有7次要疗效端点(得分0 - 1的90天,太太太太得分在90天,夫人得分0 - 2的90天,夫人得分0 - 3的90天,美国国立卫生研究院的中风尺度得分0 - 1或改进≥10分在36小时,欧洲生活质量的视觉模拟量表得分在90天,时间在24小时最大体积> 6 s,从基线和梗塞核心体积变化)和3安全终点,包括48小时内出现症状性颅内出血(sICH), 48小时内出现任何颅内出血,以及90天内全因死亡。结果在随机选取的256例患者中(中位[IQR]年龄为71.6[61.3-79.2]岁;113例(44.1%)女性),255例(99.6%)完成试验。动脉内tenecteplase组(n = 51)和标准药物治疗组(n = 34)在90天mRS评分为0到1的患者比例分别为40.5%和26.4%(相对危险度为1.44 [95% CI, 1.06-1.95];p = .02)。在7个预先设定的次要疗效终点中,没有一个显示出显著差异。与标准药物治疗相比,血管内治疗后动脉内注射tenecteplase未增加治疗后48小时内siich的发生率(5.6% vs 6.2%;相对危险度为0.95 [95% CI, 0.36-2.53];p = .92)。动脉内注射tenecteplase组90天死亡率为21.4%,标准药物治疗组为21.7%(相对危险度为0.76 [95% CI, 0.40-1.43];p = .78)。结论和相关性:在症状出现4.5 - 24小时的急性左心室vo患者中,成功取栓后动脉内注射tenecteplase在90天内获得良好神经预后的可能性更大,而不会增加sICH或死亡率的风险。然而,由于没有一项次要疗效分析支持主要发现,因此需要进一步的试验来证实结果。临床试验注册号:NCT05624190。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信