Psychometric properties of pectoralis minor muscle length tests in individuals with and without rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: A COSMIN-based systematic review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Dayana Patricia Rosa, Maria Alejandra Camacho Villa, Fernanda Assis Paes Habechian, Paula Camila Ramirez
{"title":"Psychometric properties of pectoralis minor muscle length tests in individuals with and without rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: A COSMIN-based systematic review.","authors":"Dayana Patricia Rosa, Maria Alejandra Camacho Villa, Fernanda Assis Paes Habechian, Paula Camila Ramirez","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2025.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pectoralis minor length was associated with shoulder pain and functional limitations. Although various clinical tests assess pectoralis minor length in individuals with and without shoulder pain, their psychometrics properties have not been systematically explored.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide a comprehensive overview of the measurement properties of tests used to assess pectoralis minor length in individuals with and without rotator cuff-related shoulder pain.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review with meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four electronic databases were searched until February 2025. Studies assessing any pectoralis minor length tests measurement property in adults with and without rotator cuff-related shoulder pain were included. Two reviewers independently screened all studies and assessed the risk of bias using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Subsequently, each measurement property of each pectoralis minor length test was classified as sufficient, insufficient, or inconsistent based on the COSMIN criteria for good measurement properties. A random-effects model was used in the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three tests evaluating pectoralis minor length were identified from the 10 included studies. Although no test showed sufficient evidence for all measurement properties, the pectoralis minor length (origin-insertion distance) assessed in standing had the most properties evaluated. The test demonstrated the best measurement properties in individuals with and without shoulder pain, although measurement error and responsiveness still need to be determined. The pooled results indicated very good intra- (156 individuals without pain; ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.95) and inter-rater (260 individuals without pain; ICC = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.66-0.95; 338 individuals with and without shoulder pain; ICC = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.75-0.95) reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend any test for estimating pectoralis minor length. Thus, more research is needed, particularly regarding measurement error and responsiveness. Available tests should be used with caution in research and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2025.05.011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pectoralis minor length was associated with shoulder pain and functional limitations. Although various clinical tests assess pectoralis minor length in individuals with and without shoulder pain, their psychometrics properties have not been systematically explored.

Purpose: To provide a comprehensive overview of the measurement properties of tests used to assess pectoralis minor length in individuals with and without rotator cuff-related shoulder pain.

Study design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Methods: Four electronic databases were searched until February 2025. Studies assessing any pectoralis minor length tests measurement property in adults with and without rotator cuff-related shoulder pain were included. Two reviewers independently screened all studies and assessed the risk of bias using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Subsequently, each measurement property of each pectoralis minor length test was classified as sufficient, insufficient, or inconsistent based on the COSMIN criteria for good measurement properties. A random-effects model was used in the meta-analysis.

Results: Three tests evaluating pectoralis minor length were identified from the 10 included studies. Although no test showed sufficient evidence for all measurement properties, the pectoralis minor length (origin-insertion distance) assessed in standing had the most properties evaluated. The test demonstrated the best measurement properties in individuals with and without shoulder pain, although measurement error and responsiveness still need to be determined. The pooled results indicated very good intra- (156 individuals without pain; ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.95) and inter-rater (260 individuals without pain; ICC = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.66-0.95; 338 individuals with and without shoulder pain; ICC = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.75-0.95) reliability.

Conclusions: There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend any test for estimating pectoralis minor length. Thus, more research is needed, particularly regarding measurement error and responsiveness. Available tests should be used with caution in research and clinical practice.

胸小肌长度测试在有或没有肩袖相关肩痛的个体中的心理测量特性:一项基于cosmin的系统评价。
背景:胸小肌长度与肩部疼痛和功能限制有关。尽管各种临床试验评估有或无肩痛个体的胸小肌长度,但其心理测量学特性尚未系统探索。目的:全面概述用于评估有或无肩袖相关肩痛的个体胸小肌长度的测试的测量特性。研究设计:采用荟萃分析的系统评价。方法:检索至2025年2月的4个电子数据库。研究评估了有或没有肩袖相关肩痛的成人的胸小肌长度测试测量特性。两名审稿人独立筛选所有研究,并使用基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单评估偏倚风险。随后,根据COSMIN良好测量特性的标准,将每次胸小肌长度测试的每个测量特性分为充分、不充分或不一致。meta分析采用随机效应模型。结果:从纳入的10项研究中确定了3项评估胸小肌长度的试验。虽然没有测试显示所有测量特性的充分证据,但站立时评估的胸小肌长度(起点-插入距离)具有评估的大多数特性。尽管测量误差和反应性仍有待确定,但该测试证明了有肩痛和无肩痛个体的最佳测量特性。综合结果显示,156例患者无疼痛;ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.95)和评分间(260例无疼痛;ICC = 0.87, 95% ci: 0.66-0.95;338人有或无肩痛;ICC = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.75-0.95)信度。结论:目前没有足够的证据推荐任何测试来估计胸小肌长度。因此,需要进行更多的研究,特别是在测量误差和响应性方面。在研究和临床实践中应谨慎使用现有的检测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信