Let the light in: influence of fluorescence-guided resection with 5-aminolevulinic acid on surgical outcomes, extent of resection, and survival in subventricular zone glioblastoma.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yosef Laviv, Paz Lev, Sapir Lev, Andrew A Kanner, Suzana Fichman, Alexandra Benouaich-Amiel, Dror Limon, Tali Siegal, Shlomit Yust Katz
{"title":"Let the light in: influence of fluorescence-guided resection with 5-aminolevulinic acid on surgical outcomes, extent of resection, and survival in subventricular zone glioblastoma.","authors":"Yosef Laviv, Paz Lev, Sapir Lev, Andrew A Kanner, Suzana Fichman, Alexandra Benouaich-Amiel, Dror Limon, Tali Siegal, Shlomit Yust Katz","doi":"10.3171/2025.3.JNS242570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Near-infrared fluorescence with 5-aminoleulinic acid (5-ALA) is an important tool to guide resection of glioblastoma (GBM). However, in the ventricular wall and ependyma, there may be visible fluorescence in response to 5-ALA even in the absence of tumor cells. This may impact the surgical decision to continue resection into the ventricles when the GBM is located in close proximity to the subventricular zone (SVZ). The aim of this study was to determine the surgical, radiological, and oncological implications of fluorescence-guided resection (FGR) of SVZ GBM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The electronic medical records of adult patients with newly diagnosed SVZ GBM under treatment at a tertiary medical center between January 2011 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, surgical, radiological, and outcome parameters were compared between patients resected under fluorescence guidance (FGR group) and the white light (WL)-only group, with overall and within subgroups defined by the following known prognostic factors: age (≥ 55 vs < 55 years), use of chemoradiation (yes vs no), O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status (methylated vs unmethylated), and performance status score (≥ 80 vs ≤ 70).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 94 patients. Compared to the WL group (n = 46), the FGR group (n = 48) was characterized by lower postoperative tumor volume (3.97 ± 6.92 cm3 vs 7.21 ± 6.81cm3, p = 0.038), greater extent of resection (90.91% ± 12.9% vs 81.19% ± 17.69%, p = 0.005), and higher rates of gross-total resection (28.6% vs 11.6%, OR 0.296, 95% CI 0.0968-0.9057, p = 0.0329). This group also had higher rates of intraoperative ventricular entry (72.9% vs 42.2%, p = 0.003) and shunt placement (by > 2.5-fold, p = 0.199). There were no significant between-group differences in distant recurrences or leptomeningeal dissemination. Gross-total resection showed a trend-level association with increased 1-year overall survival (HR 0.308, 95%CI 0.073-1.3, p = 0.089). When compared to the entire cohort, FGR was significantly associated with increased overall survival for the subgroups of patients that were < 55 years of age (HR 0.489, p = 0.026), treated with the Stupp protocol (HR 0.562, p = 0.0086), and had a Karnofsky Performance Scale score > 70 (HR 0.428, p = 0.00049), and this association reached near significance for patients with MGMT-methylated status (HR 0.512, p = 0.074). Such significant differences were not demonstrated for any of the WL subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FGR using 5-ALA had a significant favorable impact on extent of resection and residual tumor in patients with SVZ GBM. These positive effects associated with FGR appeared to outweigh its negative effects of increased rates of ventricular entry and shunt surgery, which had no meaningful impact on most surgical, radiological, and oncological outcomes, including survival. In patients with favorable prognostic parameters, FGR and gross-total resection were associated with clinically meaningful improved overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.JNS242570","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Near-infrared fluorescence with 5-aminoleulinic acid (5-ALA) is an important tool to guide resection of glioblastoma (GBM). However, in the ventricular wall and ependyma, there may be visible fluorescence in response to 5-ALA even in the absence of tumor cells. This may impact the surgical decision to continue resection into the ventricles when the GBM is located in close proximity to the subventricular zone (SVZ). The aim of this study was to determine the surgical, radiological, and oncological implications of fluorescence-guided resection (FGR) of SVZ GBM.

Methods: The electronic medical records of adult patients with newly diagnosed SVZ GBM under treatment at a tertiary medical center between January 2011 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, surgical, radiological, and outcome parameters were compared between patients resected under fluorescence guidance (FGR group) and the white light (WL)-only group, with overall and within subgroups defined by the following known prognostic factors: age (≥ 55 vs < 55 years), use of chemoradiation (yes vs no), O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status (methylated vs unmethylated), and performance status score (≥ 80 vs ≤ 70).

Results: The cohort included 94 patients. Compared to the WL group (n = 46), the FGR group (n = 48) was characterized by lower postoperative tumor volume (3.97 ± 6.92 cm3 vs 7.21 ± 6.81cm3, p = 0.038), greater extent of resection (90.91% ± 12.9% vs 81.19% ± 17.69%, p = 0.005), and higher rates of gross-total resection (28.6% vs 11.6%, OR 0.296, 95% CI 0.0968-0.9057, p = 0.0329). This group also had higher rates of intraoperative ventricular entry (72.9% vs 42.2%, p = 0.003) and shunt placement (by > 2.5-fold, p = 0.199). There were no significant between-group differences in distant recurrences or leptomeningeal dissemination. Gross-total resection showed a trend-level association with increased 1-year overall survival (HR 0.308, 95%CI 0.073-1.3, p = 0.089). When compared to the entire cohort, FGR was significantly associated with increased overall survival for the subgroups of patients that were < 55 years of age (HR 0.489, p = 0.026), treated with the Stupp protocol (HR 0.562, p = 0.0086), and had a Karnofsky Performance Scale score > 70 (HR 0.428, p = 0.00049), and this association reached near significance for patients with MGMT-methylated status (HR 0.512, p = 0.074). Such significant differences were not demonstrated for any of the WL subgroups.

Conclusions: FGR using 5-ALA had a significant favorable impact on extent of resection and residual tumor in patients with SVZ GBM. These positive effects associated with FGR appeared to outweigh its negative effects of increased rates of ventricular entry and shunt surgery, which had no meaningful impact on most surgical, radiological, and oncological outcomes, including survival. In patients with favorable prognostic parameters, FGR and gross-total resection were associated with clinically meaningful improved overall survival.

让光线进来:荧光引导5-氨基乙酰丙酸切除对脑室下区胶质母细胞瘤手术结果、切除范围和生存的影响。
目的:5-氨基油酸(5-ALA)近红外荧光技术是指导胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)切除术的重要工具。然而,在心室壁和室管膜中,即使没有肿瘤细胞,也可能存在对5-ALA响应的可见荧光。当GBM位于脑室下区(SVZ)附近时,这可能会影响继续切除脑室的手术决定。本研究的目的是确定荧光引导切除(FGR) SVZ GBM的外科、放射学和肿瘤学意义。方法:回顾性分析2011年1月至2021年12月在某三级医疗中心治疗的新诊断为SVZ型GBM的成年患者的电子病历。比较在荧光指导(FGR组)和白光(WL)组下切除的患者的临床、手术、放射学和结局参数,总体和亚组内由以下已知预后因素定义:年龄(≥55岁vs < 55岁)、使用放化疗(是vs否)、o6 -甲基鸟嘌呤- dna -甲基转移酶(MGMT)甲基化状态(甲基化vs未甲基化)和表现状态评分(≥80 vs≤70)。结果:该队列包括94例患者。与WL组(n = 46)相比,FGR组(n = 48)的特点是术后肿瘤体积更小(3.97±6.92 cm3 vs 7.21±6.81cm3, p = 0.038),切除范围更大(90.91%±12.9% vs 81.19%±17.69%,p = 0.005),总切除率更高(28.6% vs 11.6%, OR 0.296, 95% CI 0.0968-0.9057, p = 0.0329)。该组术中心室进入率(72.9% vs 42.2%, p = 0.003)和分流器放置率(> 2.5倍,p = 0.199)也较高。两组间远端复发或脑膜轻散无显著差异。总切除与增加的1年总生存率呈趋势水平相关(HR 0.308, 95%CI 0.073-1.3, p = 0.089)。与整个队列相比,FGR与< 55岁(HR 0.489, p = 0.026)、接受Stupp方案治疗(HR 0.562, p = 0.0086)、Karnofsky绩效量表评分bb70 (HR 0.428, p = 0.00049)的患者亚组的总生存率增加显著相关,对于mgmt -甲基化状态的患者(HR 0.512, p = 0.074),这种关联接近显著(HR 0.512, p = 0.074)。在任何WL亚组中均未显示出这种显著差异。结论:使用5-ALA的FGR对SVZ GBM患者的切除范围和残余肿瘤有显著的有利影响。这些与FGR相关的积极影响似乎超过了其增加心室进入率和分流手术的负面影响,这对大多数手术、放射学和肿瘤学结果(包括生存)没有显著影响。在预后参数良好的患者中,FGR和总切除与临床意义上的总生存改善相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信