Timing selection for sedated gastroscopy after SARS-CoV-2 infection: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Ning Yu, Xiangyu Ji, Min Wang, Li Feng, Jian Sun, Lijie Qi, Li Wang, Yinhuan Liu, Zangong Zhou
{"title":"Timing selection for sedated gastroscopy after SARS-CoV-2 infection: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Ning Yu, Xiangyu Ji, Min Wang, Li Feng, Jian Sun, Lijie Qi, Li Wang, Yinhuan Liu, Zangong Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03210-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sedated gastroscopy poses risks for patients with upper respiratory infections. The optimal timing for performing sedated gastroscopy in patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data from patients who underwent sedated gastroscopy at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between December 19th 2022 and January 20th 2023. The exposure variable was SARS-CoV-2 infection status, categorized as COVID-19-negative, two weeks post-COVID-19, and three weeks post-COVID-19. The primary outcome was gastroscopy failure, and the secondary outcomes included acute laryngitis, decreased patient satisfaction, and decreased endoscopist satisfaction. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection status and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 386 patients included, 98 were COVID-19-negative, 57 were two weeks post-COVID-19, and 231 were three weeks post-COVID-19. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that being two weeks post-COVID-19 significantly increased the risk of gastroscopy failure (adjusted OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.47-3.46, P < 0.001), acute laryngitis (adjusted OR: 6.21; 95% CI: 3.01-13.04; P < 0.001), and decreased patient satisfaction (adjusted OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.39-4.02; P < 0.001) compared with COVID-19-negative status. No statistically significant difference was found in postoperative outcomes between three weeks post-COVID-19 and COVID-19-negative status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sedated gastroscopy three weeks post-COVID-19 may be safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"337"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03210-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sedated gastroscopy poses risks for patients with upper respiratory infections. The optimal timing for performing sedated gastroscopy in patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection is uncertain.

Methods: We retrospectively collected data from patients who underwent sedated gastroscopy at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between December 19th 2022 and January 20th 2023. The exposure variable was SARS-CoV-2 infection status, categorized as COVID-19-negative, two weeks post-COVID-19, and three weeks post-COVID-19. The primary outcome was gastroscopy failure, and the secondary outcomes included acute laryngitis, decreased patient satisfaction, and decreased endoscopist satisfaction. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection status and outcomes.

Results: Among the 386 patients included, 98 were COVID-19-negative, 57 were two weeks post-COVID-19, and 231 were three weeks post-COVID-19. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that being two weeks post-COVID-19 significantly increased the risk of gastroscopy failure (adjusted OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.47-3.46, P < 0.001), acute laryngitis (adjusted OR: 6.21; 95% CI: 3.01-13.04; P < 0.001), and decreased patient satisfaction (adjusted OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.39-4.02; P < 0.001) compared with COVID-19-negative status. No statistically significant difference was found in postoperative outcomes between three weeks post-COVID-19 and COVID-19-negative status.

Conclusions: Sedated gastroscopy three weeks post-COVID-19 may be safe.

SARS-CoV-2感染后镇静胃镜检查时机选择:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:镇静胃镜检查对上呼吸道感染患者存在风险。急性SARS-CoV-2感染患者进行镇静胃镜检查的最佳时机尚不确定。方法:回顾性收集2022年12月19日至2023年1月20日在青岛大学附属医院接受镇静胃镜检查的患者资料。暴露变量为SARS-CoV-2感染状态,分为covid -19阴性、covid -19后2周和covid -19后3周。主要结局是胃镜检查失败,次要结局包括急性喉炎、患者满意度下降和内镜医师满意度下降。采用多因素logistic回归评估SARS-CoV-2感染状况与预后之间的关系。结果:386例患者中,新冠病毒阴性98例,感染2周57例,感染3周231例。多因素logistic回归显示,新冠肺炎后2周胃镜检查失败的风险显著增加(调整OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.47-3.46, P)。结论:新冠肺炎后3周镇静胃镜检查可能是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信