Effects of intraperitoneal magnesium sulfate on perioperative inflammatory response in rats with pneumoperitoneum.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Deniz Kaya Bilir, Nedim Çekmen, Merih Tepeoğlu, Huriye Eda Özturan Özer
{"title":"Effects of intraperitoneal magnesium sulfate on perioperative inflammatory response in rats with pneumoperitoneum.","authors":"Deniz Kaya Bilir, Nedim Çekmen, Merih Tepeoğlu, Huriye Eda Özturan Özer","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03139-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopy, while minimally invasive, leads to local and systemic inflammatory responses due to pneumoperitoneum. Recent studies highlight the anti-inflammatory effects of magnesium and its deficiency's link to inflammation. This study aimed to investigate the dose-dependent local and systemic anti-inflammatory effects of Mg<sup>2+</sup> on PP-related perioperative inflammatory response in an animal model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six rats were divided into four groups: MG250, MG500, pneumoperitoneum group (PG), and control group (CG). PG, MG250, and MG500 underwent pneumoperitoneum for 60 min at 12 mmHg. MG250 and MG500 received 250 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg of i.p. MgSO4 respectively, while PG received 0.9% saline. No additional procedures were performed on CG. Serum and peritoneal tissue samples were collected from all groups. Tissue samples were examined for inflammatory cell infiltration, congestion, and cellularoedema. Systemic inflammation was evaluated by measuring TNF-α, IL-1, IL-10, and MPO levels in serum samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparisons between CG and PG revealed that pneumoperitoneum amplified the local inflammatory response. Regarding systemic markers, only MPO levels were higher in PG compared to CG (p < 0.001). In MG250, both histopathological findings and MPO levels showed a lower inflammatory response compared to PG. No significant differences were observed between MG500 and PG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The application of i.p. MgSO4 during the perioperative period may exhibit anti-inflammatory effects at an appropriate dose. However, further large-scale, prospective, and randomized studies are necessary to better understand the local and systemic effects of Mg<sup>2+</sup> doses.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03139-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopy, while minimally invasive, leads to local and systemic inflammatory responses due to pneumoperitoneum. Recent studies highlight the anti-inflammatory effects of magnesium and its deficiency's link to inflammation. This study aimed to investigate the dose-dependent local and systemic anti-inflammatory effects of Mg2+ on PP-related perioperative inflammatory response in an animal model.

Methods: Thirty-six rats were divided into four groups: MG250, MG500, pneumoperitoneum group (PG), and control group (CG). PG, MG250, and MG500 underwent pneumoperitoneum for 60 min at 12 mmHg. MG250 and MG500 received 250 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg of i.p. MgSO4 respectively, while PG received 0.9% saline. No additional procedures were performed on CG. Serum and peritoneal tissue samples were collected from all groups. Tissue samples were examined for inflammatory cell infiltration, congestion, and cellularoedema. Systemic inflammation was evaluated by measuring TNF-α, IL-1, IL-10, and MPO levels in serum samples.

Results: Comparisons between CG and PG revealed that pneumoperitoneum amplified the local inflammatory response. Regarding systemic markers, only MPO levels were higher in PG compared to CG (p < 0.001). In MG250, both histopathological findings and MPO levels showed a lower inflammatory response compared to PG. No significant differences were observed between MG500 and PG.

Conclusions: The application of i.p. MgSO4 during the perioperative period may exhibit anti-inflammatory effects at an appropriate dose. However, further large-scale, prospective, and randomized studies are necessary to better understand the local and systemic effects of Mg2+ doses.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

腹腔注射硫酸镁对气腹大鼠围手术期炎症反应的影响。
背景:腹腔镜虽然微创,但由于气腹导致局部和全身炎症反应。最近的研究强调了镁的抗炎作用以及它的缺乏与炎症的联系。本研究旨在探讨Mg2+在动物模型中对pp相关围手术期炎症反应的剂量依赖性局部和全身抗炎作用。方法:36只大鼠随机分为MG250组、MG500组、气腹组(PG)和对照组(CG)。PG、MG250和MG500在12 mmHg下进行气腹60分钟。MG250和MG500分别给予250 mg/kg和500 mg/kg的MgSO4, PG给予0.9%的生理盐水。CG未做其他手术。各组均采集血清和腹膜组织标本。检查组织样本是否有炎症细胞浸润、充血和细胞性水肿。通过测定血清样本中TNF-α、IL-1、IL-10和MPO水平来评估全身性炎症。结果:CG和PG的比较显示气腹放大了局部炎症反应。在全身标志物方面,PG组只有MPO水平高于CG组(p)。结论:围手术期应用适量MgSO4可能具有抗炎作用。然而,需要进一步的大规模、前瞻性和随机研究来更好地了解Mg2+剂量的局部和全身效应。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信