Optimizing tomato yield prediction using phenologically timed UAV-based spectral data and machine learning

IF 5.7 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Carolina Trentin , Yiannis Ampatzidis , Sotirios Tasioulas , Pavlos Tsouvaltzis
{"title":"Optimizing tomato yield prediction using phenologically timed UAV-based spectral data and machine learning","authors":"Carolina Trentin ,&nbsp;Yiannis Ampatzidis ,&nbsp;Sotirios Tasioulas ,&nbsp;Pavlos Tsouvaltzis","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2025.101158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate yield prediction is critical for optimizing agricultural practices and ensuring food security. This study evaluated the performance of machine learning models in predicting tomato yield using weather data, spectral bands, and vegetation indices under varying nitrogen rates and bio-stimulant treatments to induce plant growth variability. UAV-based spectral data were collected across seven dates from October 27 to December 15, 2023, corresponding to key phenological stages: vegetative growth (data collection date 1), flowering (dates 2 and 3), fruit development (dates 4, 5, and 6), and early ripening (date 7). Significant input features were identified using the Pearson correlation coefficient (<em>r</em> &gt; 0.65, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), including Near Infrared (NIR), Red Edge, and Red spectral bands, as well as vegetation indices such as NDVI, GNDVI, NDRE, and SAVI. Aerial spectral data collected during fruit development (dates 5 and 6) showed the strongest correlations with yield (<em>r</em> = 0.66–0.74), emphasizing the importance of mid-to-late-season spectral information. Among the models evaluated, linear regression (LR) and XGBoost achieved the best performance, with root mean squared error (RMSE) values of 16.13 kg and 16.15 kg, respectively, and R² values of 0.63. Support vector machine (SVM) and decision tree (DT) also perform well, with RMSE values of 17.15 kg and 17.18 kg, respectively. In contrast, the deep learning model underperformed (RMSE = 23.49 kg, R² = 0.23), likely due to the limited data. This study highlights the predictive potential of spectral bands and emphasizes the significance of phenologically timed spectral data for yield estimation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 101158"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375525003909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate yield prediction is critical for optimizing agricultural practices and ensuring food security. This study evaluated the performance of machine learning models in predicting tomato yield using weather data, spectral bands, and vegetation indices under varying nitrogen rates and bio-stimulant treatments to induce plant growth variability. UAV-based spectral data were collected across seven dates from October 27 to December 15, 2023, corresponding to key phenological stages: vegetative growth (data collection date 1), flowering (dates 2 and 3), fruit development (dates 4, 5, and 6), and early ripening (date 7). Significant input features were identified using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r > 0.65, p < 0.05), including Near Infrared (NIR), Red Edge, and Red spectral bands, as well as vegetation indices such as NDVI, GNDVI, NDRE, and SAVI. Aerial spectral data collected during fruit development (dates 5 and 6) showed the strongest correlations with yield (r = 0.66–0.74), emphasizing the importance of mid-to-late-season spectral information. Among the models evaluated, linear regression (LR) and XGBoost achieved the best performance, with root mean squared error (RMSE) values of 16.13 kg and 16.15 kg, respectively, and R² values of 0.63. Support vector machine (SVM) and decision tree (DT) also perform well, with RMSE values of 17.15 kg and 17.18 kg, respectively. In contrast, the deep learning model underperformed (RMSE = 23.49 kg, R² = 0.23), likely due to the limited data. This study highlights the predictive potential of spectral bands and emphasizes the significance of phenologically timed spectral data for yield estimation.
利用物候定时无人机光谱数据和机器学习优化番茄产量预测
准确的产量预测对于优化农业实践和确保粮食安全至关重要。本研究利用气象数据、光谱波段和植被指数,评估了机器学习模型在不同氮浓度和生物刺激处理下预测番茄产量的性能,以诱导植物生长变异。基于无人机的光谱数据采集时间为2023年10月27日至12月15日的7个日期,对应于关键物候阶段:营养生长(数据采集日期1)、开花(日期2和3)、果实发育(日期4、5和6)和早熟(日期7)。使用Pearson相关系数(r >;0.65, p <;0.05),包括近红外(NIR)、红边(Red Edge)和红光谱波段,以及植被指数NDVI、GNDVI、NDRE和SAVI。果实发育期间(5日和6日)的航空光谱数据与产量的相关性最强(r = 0.66-0.74),强调了中后期光谱信息的重要性。其中,线性回归模型(LR)和XGBoost模型表现最佳,均方根误差(RMSE)分别为16.13 kg和16.15 kg, R²值为0.63。支持向量机(SVM)和决策树(DT)也表现良好,RMSE值分别为17.15 kg和17.18 kg。相比之下,深度学习模型表现不佳(RMSE = 23.49 kg, R²= 0.23),可能是由于数据有限。本研究强调了光谱波段的预测潜力,并强调了物候时序光谱数据对产量估计的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信