Cognitive impairment assessments in kidney transplantation: A review

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Safaa Azzouz , Laurence Coté , Donald Doell , Alessia N. Paparella , Marcelo Cantarovich , Kathleen Gaudio , Shaifali Sandal
{"title":"Cognitive impairment assessments in kidney transplantation: A review","authors":"Safaa Azzouz ,&nbsp;Laurence Coté ,&nbsp;Donald Doell ,&nbsp;Alessia N. Paparella ,&nbsp;Marcelo Cantarovich ,&nbsp;Kathleen Gaudio ,&nbsp;Shaifali Sandal","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2025.100940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mild cognitive impairment (CI) is not an absolute contraindication for kidney transplantation (KT). However, clinical assessment has not been standardized, and several practice challenges remain. We synthesized existing evidence on the effect of CI on adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and KT candidates. Of the 1333 titles and abstracts screened, seven studies were eligible; all were observational. Our synthesis included 1035 KTRs and 4659 patients being evaluated for KT. Studies that used the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (38–55 %) reported a higher CI prevalence than those that used the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (6–10 %). CI decreased the chances of KT waitlisting, however, the association with KT, graft loss and death varied by the cohort characteristics and tests used. The implications of our synthesis are limited by selection bias due to the exclusionary criterion, variability in tests and thresholds used. This may have misclassified participants with normal cognition as having CI and included those with dementia. Overall, additional evidence is needed to standardize the cognitive assessment of KTRs and candidates and inform clinical practice. A comprehensive assessment of cognition and function is indicated for the accurate diagnosis of CI, to determine CI severity, and to assess transplant candidacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"39 3","pages":"Article 100940"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X25000400","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mild cognitive impairment (CI) is not an absolute contraindication for kidney transplantation (KT). However, clinical assessment has not been standardized, and several practice challenges remain. We synthesized existing evidence on the effect of CI on adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and KT candidates. Of the 1333 titles and abstracts screened, seven studies were eligible; all were observational. Our synthesis included 1035 KTRs and 4659 patients being evaluated for KT. Studies that used the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (38–55 %) reported a higher CI prevalence than those that used the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (6–10 %). CI decreased the chances of KT waitlisting, however, the association with KT, graft loss and death varied by the cohort characteristics and tests used. The implications of our synthesis are limited by selection bias due to the exclusionary criterion, variability in tests and thresholds used. This may have misclassified participants with normal cognition as having CI and included those with dementia. Overall, additional evidence is needed to standardize the cognitive assessment of KTRs and candidates and inform clinical practice. A comprehensive assessment of cognition and function is indicated for the accurate diagnosis of CI, to determine CI severity, and to assess transplant candidacy.
肾移植患者认知障碍评估综述
轻度认知障碍(CI)不是肾移植(KT)的绝对禁忌症。然而,临床评估尚未标准化,一些实践挑战仍然存在。我们综合了CI对成人肾移植受者(KTRs)和KT候选人影响的现有证据。在筛选的1333篇标题和摘要中,有7篇研究符合条件;所有研究都是观察性的。我们的合成包括1035例ktr和4659例正在评估KT的患者。使用蒙特利尔认知评估(38 - 55%)的研究报告CI患病率高于使用改良迷你精神状态测试(6 - 10%)的研究。CI降低了KT等待登记的机会,然而,与KT、移植物损失和死亡的关联因队列特征和使用的测试而异。由于排除标准、试验的可变性和使用的阈值,我们的综合影响受到选择偏倚的限制。这可能将认知正常的参与者错误地归类为CI,并将痴呆症患者包括在内。总的来说,需要更多的证据来规范ktr和候选人的认知评估,并为临床实践提供信息。全面的认知和功能评估是准确诊断CI,确定CI严重程度和评估移植候选性的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Reviews
Transplantation Reviews IMMUNOLOGY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
40
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信