Automated 24-h surveys of flower-visiting communities reveal temporal complementarities and overlaps among strawberry pollinators

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Elsa Blareau , Clarisse Gabard , Clémence Riva , Isabelle Dajoz , Fabrice Requier
{"title":"Automated 24-h surveys of flower-visiting communities reveal temporal complementarities and overlaps among strawberry pollinators","authors":"Elsa Blareau ,&nbsp;Clarisse Gabard ,&nbsp;Clémence Riva ,&nbsp;Isabelle Dajoz ,&nbsp;Fabrice Requier","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Differences in flower visitor functional traits, such as time of day of activity or foraging behaviour, allow for complementary contributions to pollination services. These traits vary among flower visitors due both to differing physiological constraints and responses to floral resource diversity and availability. However, little is known about the temporal and behavioural complementarities of flower visitors in terms of their daily activity. We carried out automated 24-h video surveys to track strawberry flower visitors in three study sites in the region of Paris (France) with different surrounding land-use composition. We tested whether different flower visitor groups were active at different times of day (i.e. temporal complementarity vs. overlap), and whether foraging behaviour varied among groups and across the day. We found that most pollinators were active during the day, with ants reported as the main nocturnal flower visitors. Moreover, we found complementarity in the temporal activity of flower visitors in the least urbanised site. In contrast, in the more densely urbanised sites, a single peak of activity occurred during the afternoon, with dominance of honey bees, indicating overlap in temporal niche. We also found that the flower-visit duration varied substantially among pollinator groups, sites, and over the course of the day. These results emphasise how pollinator community functional complementarities can be context dependent. Indeed, currant knowledge is based mainly on diurnal observations of pollinator communities, which could bias our understanding of the relations between pollinator community composition and their contributions to pollination services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article e03727"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425003282","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Differences in flower visitor functional traits, such as time of day of activity or foraging behaviour, allow for complementary contributions to pollination services. These traits vary among flower visitors due both to differing physiological constraints and responses to floral resource diversity and availability. However, little is known about the temporal and behavioural complementarities of flower visitors in terms of their daily activity. We carried out automated 24-h video surveys to track strawberry flower visitors in three study sites in the region of Paris (France) with different surrounding land-use composition. We tested whether different flower visitor groups were active at different times of day (i.e. temporal complementarity vs. overlap), and whether foraging behaviour varied among groups and across the day. We found that most pollinators were active during the day, with ants reported as the main nocturnal flower visitors. Moreover, we found complementarity in the temporal activity of flower visitors in the least urbanised site. In contrast, in the more densely urbanised sites, a single peak of activity occurred during the afternoon, with dominance of honey bees, indicating overlap in temporal niche. We also found that the flower-visit duration varied substantially among pollinator groups, sites, and over the course of the day. These results emphasise how pollinator community functional complementarities can be context dependent. Indeed, currant knowledge is based mainly on diurnal observations of pollinator communities, which could bias our understanding of the relations between pollinator community composition and their contributions to pollination services.
对访花群体的24小时自动调查揭示了草莓传粉者之间的时间互补性和重叠性
访花者功能特征的差异,如一天中活动的时间或觅食行为,允许对授粉服务的补充贡献。由于不同的生理限制和对花卉资源多样性和可用性的反应,这些特征在花卉访问者中有所不同。然而,就其日常活动而言,人们对赏花者的时间和行为互补性知之甚少。我们在法国巴黎地区的三个研究地点进行了24小时自动视频调查,以跟踪草莓花的游客,这些地点周围的土地利用构成不同。我们测试了不同的访花者群体在一天中的不同时间是否活跃(即时间互补与重叠),以及不同群体和一天中的觅食行为是否不同。我们发现大多数传粉者在白天活跃,据报道蚂蚁是夜间主要的访花者。此外,我们发现在城市化程度最低的地点,花卉游客的时间活动具有互补性。相比之下,在更密集的城市化地点,活动的单一高峰发生在下午,蜜蜂占主导地位,表明时间生态位重叠。我们还发现,在传粉者群体、地点和一天的过程中,访花时间有很大差异。这些结果强调了传粉者群落功能的互补性是如何依赖于环境的。事实上,目前的知识主要是基于传粉媒介群落的昼夜观测,这可能会影响我们对传粉媒介群落组成与其传粉服务贡献之间关系的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信