Predicting Vancomycin Clearance in Neonates and Infants by Integrating Machine Learning and Metabolomics With Population Pharmacokinetics

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Hui Yu, Jingcheng Xiao, Hao-Jie Zhu
{"title":"Predicting Vancomycin Clearance in Neonates and Infants by Integrating Machine Learning and Metabolomics With Population Pharmacokinetics","authors":"Hui Yu,&nbsp;Jingcheng Xiao,&nbsp;Hao-Jie Zhu","doi":"10.1111/cts.70293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in neonates and infants exhibits significant variability, presenting challenges in achieving target exposures. This study aimed to investigate the influence of patient-specific covariates on vancomycin clearance and evaluate the predictive performance of various machine learning (ML) methods using clinical covariates and plasma metabolomics data. A retrospective population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was conducted on 42 neonates and infants treated at the University of Michigan Neonatal Intensive Care Unit from 2019 to 2022. Vancomycin was administered intravenously at doses ranging from 3.5 to 25 mg/kg every 6 to 24 h. A total of 214 vancomycin concentration measurements, including trough, peak, and random levels, were included in the analysis. Plasma samples collected from the patients were analyzed by an LC–MS/MS-based untargeted metabolomics assay. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin, with serum creatinine (SCr), postmenstrual age (PMA), and weight identified as significant covariates influencing clearance. Among the ML methods evaluated, Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR) achieved the highest predictive performance using clinical covariates (MSE: 0.0033; R<sup>2</sup>: 0.830). Incorporating metabolomics data did not significantly improve predictive performance for most models based solely on clinical covariates, although certain metabolomics features were among the top predictors. Both PK modeling and ML identified SCr and PMA as the most important covariates. These findings highlight the utility of ensemble ML methods, particularly GBR, in predicting vancomycin clearance using clinical covariates. While metabolomics provided limited added value for vancomycin clearance prediction, this study demonstrated an integrated ML and metabolomics approach capable of exploring PK variability in drugs with complex metabolic pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70293","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in neonates and infants exhibits significant variability, presenting challenges in achieving target exposures. This study aimed to investigate the influence of patient-specific covariates on vancomycin clearance and evaluate the predictive performance of various machine learning (ML) methods using clinical covariates and plasma metabolomics data. A retrospective population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was conducted on 42 neonates and infants treated at the University of Michigan Neonatal Intensive Care Unit from 2019 to 2022. Vancomycin was administered intravenously at doses ranging from 3.5 to 25 mg/kg every 6 to 24 h. A total of 214 vancomycin concentration measurements, including trough, peak, and random levels, were included in the analysis. Plasma samples collected from the patients were analyzed by an LC–MS/MS-based untargeted metabolomics assay. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin, with serum creatinine (SCr), postmenstrual age (PMA), and weight identified as significant covariates influencing clearance. Among the ML methods evaluated, Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR) achieved the highest predictive performance using clinical covariates (MSE: 0.0033; R2: 0.830). Incorporating metabolomics data did not significantly improve predictive performance for most models based solely on clinical covariates, although certain metabolomics features were among the top predictors. Both PK modeling and ML identified SCr and PMA as the most important covariates. These findings highlight the utility of ensemble ML methods, particularly GBR, in predicting vancomycin clearance using clinical covariates. While metabolomics provided limited added value for vancomycin clearance prediction, this study demonstrated an integrated ML and metabolomics approach capable of exploring PK variability in drugs with complex metabolic pathways.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

结合机器学习、代谢组学和群体药代动力学预测新生儿和婴儿万古霉素清除
万古霉素在新生儿和婴儿中的药代动力学表现出显著的可变性,在实现目标暴露方面提出了挑战。本研究旨在探讨患者特异性协变量对万古霉素清除率的影响,并利用临床协变量和血浆代谢组学数据评估各种机器学习(ML)方法的预测性能。对2019年至2022年在密歇根大学新生儿重症监护室治疗的42例新生儿和婴儿进行回顾性群体药代动力学(PK)分析。万古霉素以每6至24小时3.5至25 mg/kg的剂量静脉注射。总共214个万古霉素浓度测量,包括谷、峰和随机水平,纳入分析。采用LC-MS /MS-based非靶向代谢组学分析收集患者血浆样本。一阶消除的单室模型最好地描述了万古霉素的药代动力学,血清肌酐(SCr)、经后年龄(PMA)和体重被确定为影响清除率的重要协变量。在评估的ML方法中,梯度增强回归(Gradient Boosting Regressor, GBR)在使用临床协变量时取得了最高的预测性能(MSE: 0.0033;R2: 0.830)。尽管某些代谢组学特征是最重要的预测因素之一,但对于大多数仅基于临床协变量的模型,纳入代谢组学数据并没有显著提高预测性能。PK模型和ML都将SCr和PMA确定为最重要的协变量。这些发现强调了集合ML方法,特别是GBR,在使用临床协变量预测万古霉素清除率方面的效用。虽然代谢组学对万古霉素清除率预测的附加价值有限,但本研究展示了一种整合ML和代谢组学的方法,能够探索具有复杂代谢途径的药物的PK变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信