Incidence and resource burden for the management of computed tomography-detected ground glass opacities at a tertiary lung cancer service in the United Kingdom.

Abdullah AlShammari, Muhammad Ashraf, Paulo De Sousa, Vinci Naruka, Laura Tincknell, Anant Patel, Asonitis Athanasios, Sarah Booth, Jessica Wallen, Chiara Proli, Catherine Docherty, Eric Lim
{"title":"Incidence and resource burden for the management of computed tomography-detected ground glass opacities at a tertiary lung cancer service in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Abdullah AlShammari, Muhammad Ashraf, Paulo De Sousa, Vinci Naruka, Laura Tincknell, Anant Patel, Asonitis Athanasios, Sarah Booth, Jessica Wallen, Chiara Proli, Catherine Docherty, Eric Lim","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The increased use of computed tomography (CT) for lung cancer screening has significantly raised awareness of pure ground glass opacity (pGGO) lesions. GGOs pose diagnostic challenges, ranging from benign findings to invasive adenocarcinomas. We aim to evaluate the incidence of pGGOs identified on CT at a tertiary UK lung cancer service and quantify their impact on time and healthcare resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of patients with pGGOs discussed at multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings between 2017 and 2019 at the Royal Free and Royal Brompton Hospitals. Demographics were recorded, and annual incidence along with management data was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,731 patients were discussed at MDTs during the specified timeframe. On initial review 401 cases (11%) discussed were identified on CT as exhibiting areas of ground glass change, with the annual incidence increasing from 8% in 2017 to 13% in 2019. Following a second stage detailed assessment of the cases and application of exclusion criteria-such as the presence of a part solid component-259 patients were confirmed to have pure GGOs and were included for subsequent analysis in this study. The median number of MDT meetings per GGO was 2 (range: 1-3), with 3 CT scans (range: 2-4) over a median follow-up of 8.7 months (range: 2.0-24.1). PET scans were performed in 74 (27%) patients, 40 (15%) underwent biopsies (62.5% confirming malignancy), and 24 (9%) proceeded to surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rising incidence of GGOs presents a growing resource burden, with repeated MDT discussions, imaging, and interventions. Revised guidelines with improved risk stratification models are essential to optimize management, reduce unnecessary follow-up, and improve resource utilization in lung cancer services.</p>","PeriodicalId":520617,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The increased use of computed tomography (CT) for lung cancer screening has significantly raised awareness of pure ground glass opacity (pGGO) lesions. GGOs pose diagnostic challenges, ranging from benign findings to invasive adenocarcinomas. We aim to evaluate the incidence of pGGOs identified on CT at a tertiary UK lung cancer service and quantify their impact on time and healthcare resources.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with pGGOs discussed at multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings between 2017 and 2019 at the Royal Free and Royal Brompton Hospitals. Demographics were recorded, and annual incidence along with management data was analyzed.

Results: A total of 3,731 patients were discussed at MDTs during the specified timeframe. On initial review 401 cases (11%) discussed were identified on CT as exhibiting areas of ground glass change, with the annual incidence increasing from 8% in 2017 to 13% in 2019. Following a second stage detailed assessment of the cases and application of exclusion criteria-such as the presence of a part solid component-259 patients were confirmed to have pure GGOs and were included for subsequent analysis in this study. The median number of MDT meetings per GGO was 2 (range: 1-3), with 3 CT scans (range: 2-4) over a median follow-up of 8.7 months (range: 2.0-24.1). PET scans were performed in 74 (27%) patients, 40 (15%) underwent biopsies (62.5% confirming malignancy), and 24 (9%) proceeded to surgery.

Conclusions: The rising incidence of GGOs presents a growing resource burden, with repeated MDT discussions, imaging, and interventions. Revised guidelines with improved risk stratification models are essential to optimize management, reduce unnecessary follow-up, and improve resource utilization in lung cancer services.

英国三级肺癌服务中心计算机断层扫描检测磨玻璃混浊的发病率和资源负担。
目的:计算机断层扫描(CT)在肺癌筛查中的使用增加,显著提高了对纯磨玻璃混浊(pGGO)病变的认识。从良性肿瘤到浸润性腺癌,ggo对诊断构成挑战。我们的目的是评估CT在英国三级肺癌服务中发现的pGGOs的发生率,并量化其对时间和医疗资源的影响。方法:我们对2017年至2019年在皇家自由医院和皇家布朗普顿医院多学科团队(MDT)会议上讨论的pGGOs患者进行了回顾性研究。记录人口统计数据,分析年发病率和管理数据。结果:在规定的时间框架内,共有3731名患者在mdt进行了讨论。在初步审查中,401例(11%)在CT上被确定为显示磨砂玻璃改变区域,年发病率从2017年的8%增加到2019年的13%。在第二阶段对病例进行详细评估并应用排除标准(如部分固体成分的存在)后,259例患者被确认为纯ggo,并被纳入本研究的后续分析。每个GGO的MDT会议中位数为2次(范围:1-3),CT扫描3次(范围:2-4),中位随访时间为8.7个月(范围:2.0-24.1)。74例(27%)患者进行了PET扫描,40例(15%)接受了活检(62.5%确认为恶性肿瘤),24例(9%)进行了手术。结论:ggo发病率的上升带来了越来越大的资源负担,需要反复的MDT讨论、成像和干预。改进风险分层模型的修订指南对于优化管理、减少不必要的随访和提高肺癌服务的资源利用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信